Channel
@custod_glitch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
192subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002058672237 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @custod_glitch |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/custod_glitch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:54 | 192 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 191 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 189 | +6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 183 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 182 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 182 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
64 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 38 | 59.4% | |
| 💔 | 13 | 20.3% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 18.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#Щп #Процесс Решила снова взяться за эпоксидку, сделала большую заливку, а по итогу испортила форму для дайсов [делать дайсы очень сложно], испортила корвик для резки, запачкала дощечку. Наверное пора полностью отказаться от эпоксидки, потому что с ней очень много мороки и подобных казусов. Формы быстрее портятся, велик шанс всё запороть и запачкать. Ещё и подгадать сколько самой смолы понадобится для заливки трудно…
💔7❤2
#Щп #Процесс Всё ещё пробую улучшать рамки для значков. Во время носки с обычным аэрозольным слоем лака рамка царапалась до пластикового основания, что выглядело не очень. Бонусом листья на прошлом дизайне постоянно застревали в соседних значках, а один раз основательно отцепились и одно улетело. В этот раз решила сделать в несколько слоёв: маркер - аэрозольный лак - маркер - аэрозоль - топ/лак. Конкретно в такой по…
❤5❤🔥1
Прекрасный человечек не очень давно прислал мне целую посылочку украшений ✨ Помимо того, что творения Кустода в целом потрясающие, я правда их очень-очень сильно люблю и время от времени покупаю красивости, недавно я заказала себе кастомный подвес на значок. Все украшения замечательные. Но вы только полюбуйтесь Эта прелесть на первом фото сделана под Сола и Астариона 🧡❤️ Верхняя цепочка репрезентует Сола, остальное -…
❤9
#Отзыв Как же я рада когда люди оставляют отзывы ^^ Спасибо большое за него!
❤4
#Изделие #В_наличии Кольчужное колье с камушком ✨ Цена: 2500 рублей О материалах: вся фурнитура – нержавеющая сталь, бусины – пластик, камень – натуральный синий агат с включением. О особенностях: агат закреплён на замочек, благодаря чему можно поворачивать той стороной, которой хочется, а так же можно носить на другой цепочке/шнуре. Так что считайте что тут сразу 2 украшения, ведь можно носить как вместе, так и по …
❤6
#Изделие #В_наличии Розовый чокер ✨ Цена: 1000 рублей О материалах: кримпы под розовое золото – сплав, остальная фурнитура – нержавеющая сталь, кристаллы тонированного кварца, бусины из стекла и пластика, есть бусины под розовый кварц. Надеюсь, что вам понравится и до следующего поста!
❤6
#Щп #Процесс Я СПРАВИЛАСЬ!
🔥12❤1
#Щп #Процесс Сегодня перед съёмками решила доделать некоторые проекты, точнее это чокер на тросике и кольчужное колье с синим натуральным агатом. Первое то удалось закончить, а второе... Обе кольчуги слетели с камня. Очень тяжело подбирать кольца из-за обтекаемой формы камня. Второй вариант вполне подошёл, но одно кольцо не выдержало и всё слетело... Из-за всего этого съёмку придётся перенести на завтра или послезав…
💔6❤5
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @custod_glitch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Творческий уголок мультивселенной” (@custod_glitch), 192 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/custod_glitch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.