工具部分回归到自研 应该是正确的路径和趋势 包括代币的早期叙事、Rug筛查都可以交给ai来做 因为代币太多 自己是看不过来的 链上那些p小将们一天天24小时有20个小时在交易 估计人家早做好了
❤6
Signed CutePanda

Channel
@cutepandacalls
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,413subscribers
-50 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001950329192 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cutepandacalls |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cutepandacalls |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 5,413 | -3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 5,416 | -6 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 5,422 | -9 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 5,431 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 5,436 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 5,438 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 5,440 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 5,436 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 5,447 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 5,448 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 5,453 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 5,458 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 5,463 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:39 | 5,463 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
102 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 51.0% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 18.6% | |
| 🫡 | 17 | 16.7% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 4.90% | |
| ☃ | 4 | 3.92% | |
| 🤓 | 4 | 3.92% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.98% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
工具部分回归到自研 应该是正确的路径和趋势 包括代币的早期叙事、Rug筛查都可以交给ai来做 因为代币太多 自己是看不过来的 链上那些p小将们一天天24小时有20个小时在交易 估计人家早做好了
❤6
Signed CutePanda
最近几天很少交易 一直在用ai完善工具 这个持仓管理做的时间比想象中的久 本来以为一周可以搞定 实际花费了约一周来做持仓管理 每个链每个发射台以及dex都不太一样 加上很多新出现的股票池子 都花了些时间单独改 但是结果是好的 目前卖出代币不用给bot交0.5%-1%的断头税了 这个搞差不多了 后面的精力要再做买入功能了 看到好的概念让ai搞个自动买入 帮我定投就可以了 省下盯盘加仓的时间 实际上还有很多想法 比如将自己的信息源每日总结、叙事质量分析、链上钱包监控及行为分析等东西 一个一个来吧
❤4
Signed CutePanda
$WOLF
👍2
Signed CutePanda
$WOLF 拿了二十天翻倍了 感觉以后时间久一点的可以建仓这种明牌喊单的 以后可能大部分代币都不拿那么久了 meme类型的一个代币可以被分流五六次 月薪喵这个ticker 我买了三个不同的来埋伏 结果昨天BSC搞了个新的税币玩起来了 白拿了 感觉没办法玩 之前币有和屎币 我也是买的four的0税币 拿了十多天还抄底 结果也是蝴蝶出来后直接搞几个新盘 老盘子就等死了 现在市场非常现实 OG代币是没有意义的 这一点在ETH上验证很多次了 基本也是ETH可能有一个一两年的 然后SOL直接拿过去名字搞个新的 现在只不过在Fourmeme和蝴蝶上重复了而已 不管有多少个以前的币都会弄个新的玩 调整策略 接受现实 OG币等于等死
❤9☃1
Signed CutePanda
老外好像还真把Base链的$WOLF搞起来了 线走的还挺好
Signed CutePanda
如果bot的手续费是1% 那么你买1000u代币然后卖出 需要交给bot 19.9u 假设你买的分红币的税收在2% 加上1%的bot税收 那么磨损实际上是 1-97%*97% = 5.91% 你买1000u的代币再卖掉 什么都没干 先亏59.1u 行情好加上有钱的时候无所谓 现在又穷又熊 该省则省
🫡15👍3❤2💯1
Signed CutePanda
今天有一种bsc在熄火的感觉 刚旅游一趟回来开始用AI做持仓管理了 以后买卖的交易尽量不走bot 省点手续费
☃3
Signed CutePanda
笑死 一通分析 换热点了
Signed CutePanda
这下不用分析了 币有一出来 两个bsc的cpu都要归零了
😁5
Signed CutePanda
gpu(flap)今天一个大v天龙 我希望能验证我之前的逻辑
Signed CutePanda
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed CutePanda
等一个新高
Signed CutePanda
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @cutepandacalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CutePanda Calls” (@cutepandacalls), 5,413 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cutepandacalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.