ANOTHER PERSONAL SESSION 💚 Started with $1,287. A few trades later, we finished at $2,533 👀 That’s +$1,246 profit from one session together. And this is exactly why I keep saying you don’t need to sit in front of the charts all day. We waited for our setups, took the trades and stopped 📊 Simple, calm, according to the plan. Want me to trade with you personally? 💌 @julieee_trader

Channel
Trading Cute💁♀️
@cutetrad
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
99,098subscribers
+21,328 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003285628895 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cutetrad |
| Description | All about trading. The channel is posted by a girl. The channel does not guarantee income or profit. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cutetrad |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 99,098 | +3,753 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:20 | 95,345 | +141 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:22 | 95,204 | +166 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 95,038 | +213 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 94,825 | +184 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 94,641 | +166 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:54 | 94,475 | +345 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:02 | 94,130 | +226 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:43 | 93,904 | +602 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:06 | 93,302 | +858 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:47 | 92,444 | +888 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 91,556 | +920 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 90,636 | +751 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 89,885 | +722 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 89,163 | +829 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 88,334 | +287 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 88,047 | +162 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 87,885 | +138 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 87,747 | +1,751 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 85,996 | first reading |
Engagement
1,234 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 115 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.66%
- avg views ÷ 99,098 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,600
- 643 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 643
- of 1,234 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 643 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,234 (7 August 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 4,241,766 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 12:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,210
- Videos
- ≈76
- Links
- ≈1,090
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 42s
- Average length
- 23s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 105
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 4
- of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
- Most on one post
- 102
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cutetrad. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 18 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
SMALL BALANCE? THAT’S OKAY 💸 You don’t need thousands to start. Smaller balance = smaller trades + controlled risk 📊 Start with what you have and build from there. More in this video 👆 💌 @julieee_trader
Video message, posted without a caption
MARKET NEWS TODAY 📊 Guys, today is an important day for trading, especially for USD pairs 👀 💵 USD remains strong. The dollar reached a 17 month high against the euro, while pressure on EUR continues. 🇺🇸 US Manufacturing PMI also came in stronger at 55.9, showing solid manufacturing activity. ⚠️ Geopolitical tensions in the Middle East remain in focus, so we can also see unexpected market reactions outside the sch…
MORNING, MY LOVES ☀️🤍 I’m awake and slowly getting into work mode. Today we have two sessions, so I’ll be spending a lot of time with you here 👀📊 First, breakfast. Then charts 😅 See you soon 💋 💌 @julieee_trader
GOOD NIGHT, MY LOVES 🌛🤍 Laptop is finally closed and I’m disappearing for the night 😅 Thank you to everyone who spent this trading day with me. You did great today. Get some rest. Tomorrow we’ll look for new opportunities together 💋 💌 @julieee_trader
TODAY IN NUMBERS 👀📊 I know you like seeing the real stats, so here they are: 💚 31 trades 💚 85% win rate 💵 $6,358 net profit And my best trade today brought $790.50. Some days don’t need a long speech. The numbers say enough. 😅 Tomorrow we start from zero again. Want to be with me for the next session? 💌 @julieee_trader
MY LOVES, QUICK REMINDER 🏆 Our giveaway is still running, so don’t miss your chance to participate! If you haven’t joined yet, check the conditions here 👇 JOIN THE GIVEAWAY 🎁 Good luck, my loves 🍀🤍
WHY MY VIP? 💕📊 I get this question a lot, so here’s exactly what you get when you join me: 💎 2 trading sessions every day 📈 My signals and trades in real time 💬 My explanations and personal support 📚 Simple education for beginners 🛡 Deposit insurance for eligible new traders 🪙 Crypto trading on weekends And the most important part? You’re not just getting signals and being left alone. I help you understand what w…
Sticker, posted without a caption
🎓FINISHED THE TRADING SESSION IN THE VIP CHANNEL 🔵 Result: 3/3 signals hit - 1,287$ profit If you want to see more profitable trades, I give the strongest signals personally. That’s where the real results are 100% 🔗 Curious? Write me in DM - @julieee_trader
30 MINUTES ⏰ Our second trading session starts in the VIP in just 30 minutes. If you missed the first one, this is your chance to join us today 👍 Message me right now and I’ll get you in before we start. 💌 @julieee_trader
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,234 posts we hold for @cutetrad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@cutetrad edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 26 September 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Guys, the charts are fully analyzed and juicy entry points are just around the corner. Let's see your vibe for today!
- 🚀 Already in the VIP club and waiting for the signal!34%
- 🔥 Want to jump into today's session before it starts.35%
- 👀 Just watching your results for now30%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
HONEST POLL: WHAT'S THE PLAN FOR TODAY? 👇
- Joining the VIP and printing cash from signals 🚀28%
- Trading on my own (hopefully not in the red...) 📉22%
- Just watching other people's screenshots and wishing it was me 👁️25%
- Want to start, but too scared to send a DM 🫣28%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
What is your main trading goal for this month? 🤔
- I want to save up for a major purchase or a dream27%
- I dream of quitting my job and living solely off market income28%
- I want to have a stable passive income every single day26%
- For now, I just want to stop blowing my account and stay in the green24%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
💡 Want a breakdown of the deal?
- Yes53%
- No47%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you trade on weekends?
- Yes38%
- Only sometimes33%
- No, weekends off29%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
💬End of the trading week - ready to make it profitable?
- ⭐️ Ready to make profit39%
- ⚡️ Waiting for setups29%
- 🤖 Just observing32%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 18 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trading Cute💁♀️” (@cutetrad), 99,098 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cutetrad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.