Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🐸

Channel

🐸

@cvvhm1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

176subscribers

+73 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003907929261
TypeChannel
Username@cvvhm1
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 30 April 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cvvhm1

Growth

103176139.58 August 2026 — 103 subscribers9 August 2026 — 105 subscribers9 August 2026 — 105 subscribers17 August 2026 — 118 subscribers24 August 2026 — 137 subscribers1 September 2026 — 147 subscribers10 September 2026 — 163 subscribers19 September 2026 — 176 subscribers8 August 202619 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 42 days, net +73. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 92–187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 09:54176+13
10 Sept 2026, 10:18163+16
1 Sept 2026, 09:54147+10
24 Aug 2026, 23:55137+19
17 Aug 2026, 12:19118+13
9 Aug 2026, 09:01105no change
9 Aug 2026, 02:53105+2
8 Aug 2026, 03:49103first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 30 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍266.7%
133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC50 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

来自客户的真实认可 | Real Customer Feedback ❤️ 客户的满意,是我们最大的动力。 Customer satisfaction is our greatest motivation. 用实力赢得信任,用品质收获长期合作。 Quality builds trust, and trust creates long-term partnerships. ✨

👍1

5 Jul 2026, 16:33 UTC317 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

感谢您的反馈!很高兴了解到目前整体使用体验良好。我们也会持续优化产品和服务,后续如果您有任何建议或需求,欢迎随时与我们沟通。 Thank you for your feedback! We're delighted to hear that your overall experience has been positive so far. We'll continue to improve our product and services, and if you have any suggestions or requirements, please feel free to reach out anytime.

5 Jul 2026, 00:53 UTC276 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

客户一致反馈:品质优良,稳定可靠,存活率高,表现远超预期。 Customers consistently report excellent quality, reliable stability, high survival rate, and performance that exceeds expectations.

3 Jul 2026, 15:28 UTC252 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

在线秒发 工作时间调整以后正常上班时间 7:00~24:00 大单电话轰炸

👍1

30 Jun 2026, 02:04 UTC241 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Why We Don't Sell "Live-Tested" Accounts Many customers ask us: "Why don't you provide live-tested or guaranteed-live accounts?" Here's a clear explanation. Most account batches that require live testing usually fall into one or more of these categories: The source has changed hands multiple times. The inventory has been stored for a long period. The overall survival rate has declined due to repeated reselling. Selle

30 Jun 2026, 02:03 UTC213 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

关于“为什么不做包活、测活”的说明 最近很多朋友都会问我一句话: “老板,为什么你们不做包活、测活?” 这里统一说明一下。 市面上大部分需要测活、包活的库,通常存在以下几种情况: 来源复杂,不清楚经过了几次转手; 库存存放时间较长,整体活跃度下降; 多次流转后的低质量库存,需要通过测活来筛选可用数据。 这类资源最大的优势只有一个——成本低。对于只做注册类业务可能够用,但对于更注重质量和稳定性的场景,价值并不高。 我们的定位不同,我们更注重质量,而不是最低价格。 我们的优势 🔎 包小库 = 近期资源 我们采用抽样检测的方式,对每批资源进行质量检查,在源头进一步降低风控,因此无需再额外测活。 相比大量长期库存,小批量资源具备几个明显优势: 周转速度快,不会长期积压; 售完后持续补充新货,保证资源的新鲜度; 整体质量更稳定,存活率更高; 减少重复流转带来的风险。 关于价格 很多人觉得为什么我们的价格比普通随机库高一些。 原因其实很简单

8 Jun 2026, 00:40 UTC241 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

老客户直接复购400件,大批量囤货 好产品自带口碑,不辜负每一份选择 现货充足,欢迎各位老板批量拿货 A returning customer directly repurchased 400 pieces, stocking up in bulk. Good products earn their reputation; we won't let any customer down. In stock; bulk orders are welcome.

9 May 2026, 12:24 UTC414 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

好的产品不需要废话 Good products don't need nonsense.

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @cvvhm1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🐸” (@cvvhm1), 176 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cvvhm1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.