足球(滚球)大/小(3 - 3) 捷克U19联赛 欧帕华U19 对阵 奥洛穆茨西格玛U19 大 6.5 / 7
👍6🔥3❤2

Channel
@cx164
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
48,188subscribers
+45,622 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003842593262 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cx164 |
| Description | ✅提前关注,锁定2026世界杯每一场焦点大战!带你赚人生中的第一个1,000,000$ ⚽️2026世界杯预测频道|每日赛事结果预测 🥇平台百万上押!安全!放心!可靠! 2026世界杯最新动态比赛结果预测,频道预测数据api接口实时更新! 数据源:多维数据融合胜率模型(Market + AI + Odds=🏆预测频道 on.1 ) #世界杯 #预测 #足球 #体育推单 #足球推单 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 37 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cx164 |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Oct 2026, 04:20 | 48,188 | -52 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:16 | 48,240 | -414 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 08:26 | 48,654 | -408 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:10 | 49,062 | -87 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 11:20 | 49,149 | -13 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:20 | 49,162 | +137 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:14 | 49,025 | -116 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:58 | 49,141 | -44 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:21 | 49,185 | -129 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:21 | 49,314 | -113 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:30 | 49,427 | +1,910 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:57 | 47,517 | +55 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 47,462 | +1,364 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 23:06 | 46,098 | +255 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 19:57 | 45,843 | +3,637 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 21:29 | 42,206 | +2,126 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 16:51 | 40,080 | +7,494 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 22:14 | 32,586 | +8,094 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 18:18 | 24,492 | +230 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 24,262 | first reading |
227 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 77 of 139 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 227 (6 August 2026 – 30 October 2026) |
| Views total | 231,108 |
| Reactions total | 521 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Oct 2026, 00:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
990 reactions across 103 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 364 | 36.8% | |
| 🔥 | 322 | 32.5% | |
| ❤ | 304 | 30.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 103 of the 227 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 990 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 227 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
足球(滚球)大/小(3 - 3) 捷克U19联赛 欧帕华U19 对阵 奥洛穆茨西格玛U19 大 6.5 / 7
👍6🔥3❤2
晚场5串一 倍数:27.40 ——同路上车 跟反自由- ——赛事无神 红黑勿怪- ———————————————— 【🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟】 挪威足球超级联赛 博多格林特 vs 维京 (31/10 02:00) 让球 (欧洲盘) 【五星重锤单】 博多格林特(-1) @ 1.92 昨日五连红,今日冲击六连。 ———————————————— 【🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟】 德国乙级联赛 科特布斯 vs 波鸿 (31/10 01:30) 让球 (欧洲盘) 科特布斯(+0/0.5) @ 1.97 ———————————————— 【🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟】 法国甲级联赛 勒阿弗尔 vs 巴黎圣日耳曼 (31/10 02:00) 让球 (欧洲盘) 巴黎圣日耳曼(-1.5) @ 1.88 ———————————————— 【🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟】 西班牙甲级联赛 比利亚雷亚尔 vs 西班牙人 (31/10 04:00) 让球 (欧洲盘) 比利亚雷亚尔(-1/1.5) @ 1.88 ——…
👍11🔥8❤4
马来西亚超级联赛 汶莱皇太子殿下足球会 对阵 森美兰 足球(滚球)大 / 小(1 - 1) 大 3 / 3.5
澳大利亚甲组联赛 布里斯班狮吼 对阵 奥克兰 足球让球 奥克兰 0 泰国甲组联赛 斯萨克联 对阵 拉查布里府 足球总进球数 2-3 沙特超级联赛 亚哈 对阵 伊蒂哈德吉达 足球让球 伊蒂哈德吉达 -1
晚场5串一 倍数:23.76 ——同路上车 跟反自由- ——赛事无神 红黑勿怪- ———————————————— 【🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟】 意大利甲级联赛 弗罗西诺内 vs 莱切 (30/10 01:30) 让球 (欧洲盘) 弗罗西诺内(-0.5/1) @ 1.93 ———————————————— 【��🌟🌟】 英格兰联赛杯 埃弗顿 vs 纽卡斯尔联 (30/10 03:45) 让球 (欧洲盘) 纽卡斯尔联(+0/0.5) @ 1.88 ———————————————— 【🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟】 瑞典超级联赛 哈马比 vs 天狼星 (30/10 01:30) 让球 (欧洲盘) 天狼星(+1/1.5) @ 1.85 ———————————————— 【🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟】 芬兰超级联赛 - 附赛 图尔库国际 vs 赫尔辛基 (30/10 00:00) 让球 (欧洲盘) 【五星重锤单】 赫尔辛基(+0/0.5) @ 1.89 昨日四连红,今日冲击五连。 —…
波兰杯 斯维德尼克 对阵 拉多麦科 足球(滚球)大小盘 - 上半场(0-0) 大 0.5 / 1
足球(滚球)大 / 小(1 - 0) 亚足联冠军联赛二 江原 v 古晋城 大 1.5 / 2
晚场5串一 倍数:28.66 ——同路上车 跟反自由--- ——赛事无神 红黑勿怪--- ———————————————— 【🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟】 英格兰联赛杯 伯恩茅斯 vs 阿斯顿维拉 (29/10 03:45) 让球 (欧洲盘) 阿斯顿维拉(+0/0.5) @ 1.87 ———————————————— 【🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟】 英格兰联赛杯 曼城 vs 布莱顿 (29/10 03:30) 让球 (欧洲盘) 曼城(-0.5/1) @ 1.86 ———————————————— 【🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟】 英格兰联赛杯 富勒姆 vs 水晶宫 (29/10 03:45) 让球 (欧洲盘) 富勒姆(-0.5/1) @ 2.05 ———————————————— 【🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟】 英格兰联赛杯 利物浦 vs 切尔西 (29/10 04:00) 让球 (欧洲盘) 切尔西(+0/0.5) @ 1.99 ———————————————— 【🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟】 意大利甲级联赛…
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
【意甲】00:30 AC米兰 vs 博洛尼亚 推荐:全场大 2.5 【意甲】00:30 威尼斯 vs 国际米兰 推荐:客队 -1.5 【意甲】02:45 热那亚 vs 尤文图斯 推荐:客队 -0.75 【英联杯】03:30 曼城 vs 布莱顿 推荐:全场大 3 【英联杯】04:00 利物浦 vs 切尔西 推荐:全场大 3.25 【德国杯】02:45 勒沃库森 vs 纽伦堡 推荐:全场大 4
👍1
---同路上车,跟反自由--- ---赛事无神,红黑勿怪--- 意甲 01:30 对阵:威尼斯-国际米兰 推荐:全场小(3.5) 意甲 03:45 对阵:蒙扎-那不勒斯 推荐:那不勒斯(-0.5/1) 英联杯 03:30 对阵:曼城-布莱顿 推荐:曼城(-0.5/1) 德国杯 01:00 对阵:弗莱堡-沃尔夫斯堡 推荐:弗莱堡(-1) 德国杯 01:00 对阵:帕德博恩-斯图加特 推荐:斯图加特(-1) 德国杯 01:00 对阵:勒沃库森-纽伦堡 推荐:勒沃库森(-2) 德国杯 03:45 对阵:拜仁-马格德堡 推荐:拜仁(-3.5) 德国杯 03:45 对阵:荷尔斯泰因基尔-霍芬海姆 推荐:全场大(3.5) 国王杯 03:00 对阵:特里巴尔-莱加内斯 推荐:莱加内斯(-2) 国王杯 03:00 对阵:普尔托兰诺-阿尔瓦塞特 推荐:阿尔瓦塞特(-1) 瑞典超 02:00 对阵:布洛马波卡纳-赫根 推荐:赫根…
亚足联冠军精英联赛 鹿岛鹿角 vs 浦项制铁 足球(滚球)大小盘(0-0) 大 1/1.5
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 227 posts we hold for @cx164. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“世界杯预测|欧洲杯|五大联赛足球推单” (@cx164), 48,188 subscribers as measured 30 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cx164.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.