Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cxwbee стрімить

Channel

Cxwbee стрімить

@cxwbee_twitch

Not marked by Telegram, checked 29 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

435subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002231142837
TypeChannel
Username@cxwbee_twitch
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cxwbee_twitch

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

434445439.58 August 2026 — 445 subscribers9 August 2026 — 445 subscribers17 August 2026 — 443 subscribers25 August 2026 — 440 subscribers2 September 2026 — 438 subscribers11 September 2026 — 434 subscribers19 September 2026 — 435 subscribers4358 August 202619 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 42 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 432–447 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 06:39435+1
11 Sept 2026, 11:21434-4
2 Sept 2026, 03:24438-2
25 Aug 2026, 02:15440-3
17 Aug 2026, 13:28443-2
9 Aug 2026, 05:51445no change
8 Aug 2026, 13:46445first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,283 reactions across 20 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡42333.0%
40531.6%
😁776.00%
🔥695.38%
😨624.83%
😱382.96%
👍302.34%
❤‍🔥292.26%
💯262.03%
🖕231.79%
👀211.64%
😢120.935%
💩100.779%
🤯100.779%
🤮70.546%
🤔60.468%
🤬60.468%
🤣50.39%
🌚40.312%
🏆40.312%
8 further kinds161.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,283 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2025 to 1 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jul 2025, 23:00 UTC≈3,790 views203 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В ситуації дівчата-усач нам треба було почути другу сторону. А в ситуації коубіманіпулятор-ліда нам почути другу сторону вже не важливо. Бо пані netremba сказала "та поєбать" "Можеш переходити на ті канали і продовжувати в цьому розбиратись сам". В мене десятки скрінів і купа голосових, де Ліда хотіла розголосу. Але кому це тепер треба, правда? Конфлікт вирішився зручно для всіх, і дуже зручно виставити крайнім уйобк

🤡14840💩5👍4🤮4👀1🔥1

29 Jun 2025, 18:16 UTC≈23,600 views370 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Як і обіцяв, стаття про все, що я не міг сказати одразу Я попрошу вас поставитися до неї серйозно, і з розумом обирати те, що і кого ви дивитись на твічі. Стрімери і стрімеркині, яким було недостатньо доказів - все тут. Сподіваюсь на ваш сапорт і свідомість https://telegra.ph/Usachmen---nasilnik-06-29

180🤡105😱36🖕21🔥9👍6🏆4🤔3

29 Jun 2025, 12:45 UTC≈6,710 views87 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Пупупу, маємо вибачення від виблядка, але за шо - непанятна🧐 Зараз готується пост де більш докладно ви зможете все прочитати і усвідомити для себе яка ця людина є насправді. Якщо не було ситуацій про які я казав, за що вибачатись? Хто казав про презумпції невинності на його стороні - все таки не спрацювало.

46🤡23🔥6🤣5🖕2😁2❤‍🔥1🌚1

27 Jun 2025, 22:37 UTC≈6,220 views61 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://kappalol.fun/ghIDvk Прошу звернути увагу на міміку обличчя і на те в який саме момент тіп офнув кліп) ну і власне саму відповідь.

33🤡10💯8😁6👍2💩1🗿1

27 Jun 2025, 21:07 UTC≈5,590 views59 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Тіп подивився кліп до моменту з ліфтом і офнув, я спитав чого ж не додивився)

😁41🤡11💯5🤮2

27 Jun 2025, 21:03 UTC≈8,450 views73 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Полетіли трошки контексту до моїх висловлювань, для тих хто не був на стрімі. Я маю двох знайомих дівчат, які мали змогу відчути на собі нахили цього насильника. Одразу зазначу що насилля це не тільки про секс. Насилля може бути як емоційне, такі фізичне. Починалось все лайтово, якісь там рухи руками обережні, якісь фрази кинуті наче в повітря. Але одна з дівчин отримала потужний монолог в свою сторону, про те яка в

45💯13🤬6🤡5🤯3😁1

27 Jun 2025, 20:47 UTC≈3,860 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На емоціях єбанув хейтспіч потужний, тому не можу залишити ефір доступним У будь якому разі пам'ятайте що усачмен єбане уйобіще, насильник, який не заслуговує взагалі щось транслювати іншим людям

33👍9🤡6🔥5

26 Jun 2025, 19:58 UTC≈3,630 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Приходьте завтра ввечері, побалакаємо, а я похуєсошу певних індивідуумів українського твіча

😨27😁11🤔3🤡3

26 Jun 2025, 19:57 UTC≈3,480 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сумно шо немає конфліктів на укр твічі, якось нецікаво Хочу це трошки виправити

😨18😁6🤡5🤯1

26 Jun 2025, 19:56 UTC≈3,840 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Хочете стрім і жоских скандалів?

😨17👍7🔥6🤡4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cxwbee_twitch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

тремба
@thetremba · 44,632
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cxwbee стрімить” (@cxwbee_twitch), 435 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cxwbee_twitch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.