Чикагская товарная биржа (CME Group) запустила два новых криптовалютных индекса 🟢CME Group запустила мультиактивные индексы CME CF Crypto Market Index и CME CF Emerging Crypto Index. Оба бенчмарка рассчитываются ежесекундно на основе взвешенной рыночной капитализации. Состав активов в корзинах будет пересматриваться дважды в год - в июне и декабре. 🟢Индекс Crypto Market Index включает Биткоин и Эфириум для оценки о…

Channel
Hi-Tech Крипта Инвестиции
@cyberhitech
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,753subscribers
-222 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001654087339 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cyberhitech |
| Created | 10 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cyberhitech |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 10,753 | -12 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:36 | 10,765 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:27 | 10,774 | -8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:33 | 10,782 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 10,788 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 10,798 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 10,804 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 10,810 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 10,813 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 10,820 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 10,830 | -15 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 10,845 | -13 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 10,858 | -12 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 10,870 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 10,875 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 10,884 | -7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 10,891 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:59 | 10,897 | -11 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 10,908 | -8 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 10,916 | first reading |
Engagement
102 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.607%
- avg views ÷ 10,753 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 65.3
- 73 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.74%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 73
- of 102 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 73 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 102 (31 July 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,765 |
| Reactions total | 43 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 20:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 8m 06s
- Average length
- 1m 01s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
75 reactions across 55 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 39 | 52.0% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 13.3% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 9.33% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 5.33% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 4.00% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.33% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Strive укрепляет позиции: корпоративный резерв пополнился на 1800 BTC 🟢Американская компания Strive отчиталась перед SEC о покупке 1 800 BTC за $143 млн. Сделка прошла по средней цене $79 431 за монету за счет выпуска новых акций. 🟢Теперь резервы Strive составляют 23 156 BTC на сумму около $1,8 млрд. Это позволило компании обойти платформу Bullish и войти в топ-5 корпоративных держателей биткоина. 🟢Покупка совпала…
📊 Каждый раз, когда Bitcoin закрывал в плюс и июль, и август, сентябрь оказывался красным. Исторически такая ситуация уже происходила 4 раза — в 2013, 2017, 2020 и 2021 годах. И каждый раз после двух зелёных месяцев подряд сентябрь закрывался в минус. Теперь в 2026 году Bitcoin снова закрыл июль и август в зелёной зоне. 👀 Повторится ли этот паттерн снова, или на этот раз история будет переписана? 🔥📉 📈Bybit 📈 Mex…
🚨 Крупнейшими держателями XRP ETF стали Goldman Sachs, Jane Street и Millennium Management Согласно отчётам 13F за второй квартал, крупнейшими институциональными держателями XRP ETF являются Goldman Sachs, Jane Street и Millennium Management. Данные опубликовал аналитик Bloomberg Джеймс Сейффарт. Интерес крупных игроков Уолл-стрит к XRP через ETF продолжает расти. 👀📈 #XRP #Ripple #ETF #Crypto 📈Bybit 📈 Mexc 📈 Bit…
Легальный крипторынок во Вьетнаме: первые 5 компаний прошли отбор 🟢Вьетнам запускает пятилетнюю пилотную программу регулирования цифровых активов. Первые пять местных компаний уже одобрены для открытия официальных криптобирж. В список вошли структуры, связанные с крупнейшими банками страны: Techcombank, VPBank, LPBank, VIX Securities и Sun Group. 🟢Для получения лицензий фирмам нужно выполнить строгие условия. Им тр…
🚨 МАССИВНОЕ НАКОПЛЕНИЕ STRK КИТАМИ И ВЗРЫВ ДЕРИВАТИВОВ! ИДЕАЛЬНЫЙ ШТОРМ ДЛЯ STARKNET? 🔥 Ончейн-данные и рынок деривативов сигнализируют о резком росте активности вокруг Starknet ($STRK). 🐋 Крупный кит вывел 51,492 млн STRK с Binance! Согласно данным Arkham, около 17 часов назад крупный игрок перевёл с горячих кошельков Binance на приватный адрес 0x04E0C…: 🔹 40 000 000 STRK — около $975,5 тыс. 🔹 11 492 000 STRK — …
Страшное видео с Непала Подпишись сейчас: @energynewz
🤔1
Если в август биткоин закрывал ростом, то в сентябре он как правило падал, согласно историческим данным 📈Bybit 📈 Mexc 📈 Bitget 📈 OKX 📈 Крипта по СБП 📈 Акции РФ
🚨 Charles Schwab с активами на $13 ТРИЛЛИОНОВ тихо превращается в криптобиржу Всего за 4 месяца после запуска Schwab Crypto брокер уже: • Запустил прямую торговлю Bitcoin и Ethereum • Анонсировал листинг SOL, AVAX и LINK • Запустил 24/7 фьючерсы на Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana и XRP • Пообещал добавить возможность ввода и вывода криптовалюты со счетов 🔥 Следующим шагом, как сообщается, станет сервис для финансовых ко…
«Финам» нацелился на крипторынок РФ: инвесторов ждет эпоха спекуляций 🟢Финансовая группа «Финам» официально подтвердила выход на легальный крипторынок РФ. По словам президента компании Владислава Кочеткова, брокер станет лицензированным посредником и обменником. Создавать свой депозитарий группа не будет из-за высоких затрат: проект стоимостью от 3 млрд рублей окупался бы более 8 лет. 🟢Новая площадка будет исключит…
⚡1
Schwab добавит Solana, Avalanche и Chainlink 🟢Брокер Charles Schwab ($13+ трлн под управлением) расширяет сервис Schwab Crypto. В ближайшие месяцы клиенты смогут покупать Solana (SOL), Avalanche (AVAX) и Chainlink (LINK). До этого платформа поддерживала только BTC и ETH. 🟢Интеграция откроет доступ к альткоинам для 39 млн инвесторов через приложения Schwab и thinkorswim. Решение принято из-за высокого спроса и зрело…
🔥 ТОП БЛОКЧЕЙНОВ ПО ON-CHAIN REVENUE В ЭТОМ МЕСЯЦЕ Какие сети реально зарабатывают больше всего? 👀 1️⃣ TRON — $26.7M 🥇 2️⃣ Solana — $18.1M 3️⃣ BNB Chain — $17.8M 4️⃣ Ethereum — $11M 5️⃣ Bitcoin — $6.7M 6️⃣ Base — $2.7M 7️⃣ Polygon — $2.1M 8️⃣ Arbitrum — $326K 9️⃣ ICP — $228K 📈 🔟 Starknet — $168K 1️⃣1️⃣ Avalanche — $103K 1️⃣2️⃣ Aptos — $89K 1️⃣3️⃣ TON — $86K 1️⃣4️⃣ Optimism — $52K 1️⃣5️⃣ NEAR — $43K 💰 Главный сюрпр…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @cyberhitech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@NotTheHamster · 309,385
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
@chunkGAME · 94,067
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
@thetamaxxing · 37,123
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hi-Tech Крипта Инвестиции” (@cyberhitech), 10,753 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyberhitech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.