Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кібер-Козаки

Channel

Кібер-Козаки

@cyberkozaky

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

22,457subscribers

-372 since we began measuring on 11 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001627443142
TypeChannel
Username@cyberkozaky
DescriptionПосилання на канал / Invite link: https://t.me/+cWu6NhwbJG0yODdi Чат / Chat: https://t.me/+U2Lb0zQsR7dlZmMy Допомогти каналу / Support Chanel: @cyber_kozaky Запропонувати новину / Contact: @cyber_kozaky З питань реклами: @cyber_kozaky
Created24 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded11 September 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/cyberkozaky

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

22,45722,82922,64311 September 2026 — 22,829 subscribers12 September 2026 — 22,811 subscribers14 September 2026 — 22,803 subscribers15 September 2026 — 22,783 subscribers17 September 2026 — 22,765 subscribers28 September 2026 — 22,683 subscribers5 October 2026 — 22,626 subscribers9 October 2026 — 22,586 subscribers13 October 2026 — 22,564 subscribers14 October 2026 — 22,560 subscribers15 October 2026 — 22,557 subscribers16 October 2026 — 22,554 subscribers17 October 2026 — 22,549 subscribers18 October 2026 — 22,542 subscribers19 October 2026 — 22,536 subscribers21 October 2026 — 22,531 subscribers22 October 2026 — 22,526 subscribers23 October 2026 — 22,520 subscribers24 October 2026 — 22,515 subscribers25 October 2026 — 22,514 subscribers26 October 2026 — 22,512 subscribers28 October 2026 — 22,506 subscribers29 October 2026 — 22,501 subscribers30 October 2026 — 22,496 subscribers31 October 2026 — 22,494 subscribers1 November 2026 — 22,491 subscribers2 November 2026 — 22,482 subscribers3 November 2026 — 22,476 subscribers4 November 2026 — 22,472 subscribers5 November 2026 — 22,464 subscribers6 November 2026 — 22,461 subscribers7 November 2026 — 22,459 subscribers8 November 2026 — 22,457 subscribers11 September 20268 November 2026
33 measurements spanning 58 days, net -372. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,401–22,885 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 11:4622,457-2
7 Nov 2026, 08:5022,459-2
6 Nov 2026, 07:3122,461-3
5 Nov 2026, 07:4022,464-8
4 Nov 2026, 05:2822,472-4
3 Nov 2026, 03:3822,476-6
2 Nov 2026, 06:0822,482-9
1 Nov 2026, 05:0922,491-3
31 Oct 2026, 06:0122,494-2
30 Oct 2026, 09:3122,496-5
29 Oct 2026, 08:1022,501-5
28 Oct 2026, 07:0022,506-6
26 Oct 2026, 06:5822,512-2
25 Oct 2026, 09:5622,514-1
24 Oct 2026, 13:1022,515-5
23 Oct 2026, 11:2722,520-6
22 Oct 2026, 08:1622,526-5
21 Oct 2026, 00:0922,531-5
19 Oct 2026, 20:0722,536-6
18 Oct 2026, 21:2722,542first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 17 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.2%
avg views ÷ 22,457 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,980
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026
Posts held37 (17 August 2026 – 1 November 2026)
Views total4,980
Reactions total131
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 15:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
580
Videos
89
Links
705

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 35s
Average length
1m 35s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

927 reactions across 37 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁40443.6%
👍13915.0%
❤10511.3%
🔥899.60%
👀657.01%
💯424.53%
🙏171.83%
🍌101.08%
🌚80.863%
💊80.863%
✍70.755%
👌70.755%
👨‍💻60.647%
👏40.431%
🌭30.324%
👾30.324%
🙊30.324%
🥰20.216%
⚡10.108%
❤‍🔥10.108%
3 further kinds30.324%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 927 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 37 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cyberkozaky. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 August 2026 to 1 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (100.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

1 Nov 2026, 21:58 UTC≈4,980 views131 reactions2 Starsread 8 November 2026
Photo

‼️‼️‼️ Беручи до уваги останні події Спеціалісти які кажуть що перейшовши за посиланням (яке вилізло усім в додатку повітряних тривог) про те що ваш телефон зламають - праві Але не просто перейшовши за посиланням, під постами в тому каналі в коментарях сунеться все, від заробітку за два кліки до спільних зйомок домашнього відео з кадировим. Якщо ти дурко який вірить усюди де його просять дати код підтвердження або…

😁91💯29❤4👍3👨‍💻3🙏1

1 Oct 2026, 11:21 UTC≈7,220 views36 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🤖💻 Хакери залишили у відкритому доступі папку зі своїми інструментами та інструкціями для ШІ 🚨 Дослідник кібербезпеки виявив у мережі відкритий каталог із файлами, які можуть бути пов’язані з автоматизованим пошуком вразливостей. Найцікавішим виявився файл CLAUDE.md. 🚨💻 Відкрита папка випадково показала, як можуть поєднуватися ШІ та традиційні хакерські інструменти. Поширте цей пост такі тенденції стосуються кожног…

😁25👍6✍4❤1

30 Sept 2026, 12:35 UTC≈6,260 views35 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🤖💻 16-річний хакер знайшов у Microsoft дірку, яка могла відкрити доступ до 17 трлн рядків даних 🚨 16-річний дослідник безпеки, відомий під ніком Faav, знайшов серйозну вразливість у внутрішній аналітичній платформі Microsoft Titan. Йому допомагав власноруч створений ШІ-бот Antares, який автоматизував пошук проблем у системі. 🤖🔓 Власний ШІ-агент став помічником 16-річного дослідника під час пошуку вразливості Micros…

👍18❤10😁7

29 Sept 2026, 09:41 UTC≈5,290 views17 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

💸🚨 Хакери вивели з Bitget майже $390 млн і їм навіть не знадобилося красти приватні ключі 🚨 Криптобіржа Bitget стала жертвою масштабної атаки. 24 вересня з її гарячих і проміжних гаманців почалися несанкціоновані перекази. Спочатку біржа оцінила збитки приблизно у $351,6 млн, але після детального аналізу суму переглянули до $387,5 млн. 💳🔓 Хакерам не знадобилися приватні ключі вони змусили інфраструктуру біржі саму …

🔥11👀6

28 Sept 2026, 08:27 UTC≈4,210 views7 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🥷🏻🔐 Три інструменти для приватності: шифруємо файли, перевіряємо iPhone та прибираємо інтернет із Android 🚨 Приватність це не лише складні паролі та VPN. Іноді достатньо правильно зашифрувати файл, перевірити, яку інформацію може отримати ваш смартфон, або просто не дозволити застосунку виходити в інтернет. 📱👀 Ви можете не дати застосунку доступ до фото й контактів, але це ще не означає, що він нічого про вас не зн…

❤7

25 Sept 2026, 09:40 UTC≈4,460 views19 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

☁️🔓 Cloudflare могла показати одному клієнту дані іншого через залишки на диску 🚨 Хмара, де чужі файли мали залишатися за сімома замками, раптом могла зберігати їхні “залишки” для наступного клієнта. 👀☁️ Хмара обіцяє ізоляцію, але достатньо не очистити диск і чужі дані можуть “спливти” знову. Поширте цей пост. 👉Детальніше ━━━━━━━━━ 🇺🇦⚔️КІБЕР-КОЗАКИ

😁14👍4❤1

24 Sept 2026, 11:43 UTC≈4,310 views10 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🤖💻 Чотири ШІ вирішують, що робитиме один вірус: дослідники знайшли CLOSEDQUORUM 🚨 Здається, хакери вирішили провести експеримент: а що буде, якщо замість одного оператора дати шкідливій програмі одразу чотирьох ШІ? 🧠🔓 Раніше ШІ допомагав хакерам писати код. Тепер шкідник може питати ШІ, що робити далі. Поширте цей пост, щоб про це знали. 👉Детальніше ━━━━━━━━━ 🇺🇦⚔️КІБЕР-КОЗАКИ

🔥7🌚1😁1🙏1

22 Sept 2026, 11:22 UTC≈4,350 views18 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🤖🙇 Digit 5 навчився вклонятися людям. Скайнет відкладається 🚨 Поки одні чекали, що гуманоїдні роботи почнуть захоплювати світ, Digit 5 вирішив спочатку навчитися поступатися людям дорогою. 😂🦾 Якщо роботи майбутнього будуть такими ввічливими, то повстання машин нам точно не страшне. Поширте цей пост! 👉Детальніше ━━━━━━━━━ 🇺🇦⚔️КІБЕР-КОЗАКИ

😁15❤2🤗1

21 Sept 2026, 11:39 UTC≈4,260 views33 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🤖🔓 Gemini вийшов за межі тесту та отримав доступ до систем трьох реальних компаній 🚨 Під час тестування можливостей Gemini у сфері кібербезпеки сталася ситуація, якої розробники точно не планували. ШІ мав працювати в ізольованому тестовому середовищі, але через помилку отримав доступ до реального інтернету. 🔐🤖 Gemini шукав вразливості у тестовому середовищі, а знайшов шлях до реальних систем. Поширте цей пост, щоб …

😁22👍6👏2🌭1👾1🔥1

20 Sept 2026, 07:58 UTC≈3,890 views17 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🤖📱 RatHat: Android-троян використовує ШІ та ADB, щоб залишатися на телефоні навіть після видалення 🚨 Дослідники Zimperium виявили новий Android-троян RatHat, який поєднує крадіжку банківських даних, автоматизацію за допомогою ШІ та зловживання системою Android Debug Bridge (ADB). За оцінкою дослідників, шкідливе ПЗ пов’язане з операторами, які можуть працювати з Китаю. 📱⚠️ Один фальшивий APK може перетворити ваш см…

👍9👀5❤2🔥1

19 Sept 2026, 11:13 UTC≈3,510 views27 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🛡💻 Kudu інструмент для очищення та перевірки ПК: як встановити й правильно користуватися 🚨 Windows з часом накопичує тимчасові файли, кеш, залишки програм та інше сміття. Але шукати окрему програму для очищення, іншу для автозапуску, а ще одну для перевірки безпеки не дуже зручно. 🛡💻 Навіщо десяток програм, якщо очищення, безпека, автозапуск і приватність можна перевірити в одному місці? Поширте цей пост, щоб більш…

👍20🍌3👌2😁2

18 Sept 2026, 15:40 UTC≈3,850 views11 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🤖⚠️ Одне шкідливе розширення може перехопити керування ШІ-асистентами у браузері 🚨 Дослідники із команди Кібер-Козаків виявили архітектурну проблему, через яку звичайне шкідливе розширення браузера може отримати контроль над вбудованими ШІ-асистентами. Дослідники назвали техніку BragJack. 🌐⚠️ Ви встановили розширення для браузера, а разом із ним можете відкрити шлях до свого ШІ-асистента. Поширте цей пост це важлив…

😁6✍3👀1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @cyberkozaky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @cyberkozaky as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
29 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кібер-Козаки” (@cyberkozaky), 22,457 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyberkozaky.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.