Channel
@cyberpunk_for_us
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
5,908subscribers
-1,032 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001603397267 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cyberpunk_for_us |
| Created | 5 December 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cyberpunk_for_us |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:46 | 5,908 | -20 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:39 | 5,928 | -21 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:15 | 5,949 | -49 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:11 | 5,998 | -23 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:27 | 6,021 | -20 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:30 | 6,041 | -18 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 06:31 | 6,059 | -20 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 20:55 | 6,079 | -22 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 13:08 | 6,101 | -51 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 21:21 | 6,152 | -62 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 6,214 | -104 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 6,318 | -57 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 6,375 | -55 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 6,430 | -135 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 6,565 | -274 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:48 | 6,839 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 6,847 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 6,854 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 6,864 | -15 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 6,879 | first reading |
81 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 81 (2 August 2026 – 30 October 2026) |
| Views total | 32,230 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 01:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
849 reactions across 60 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 239 | 28.2% | |
| 👾 | 158 | 18.6% | |
| 💊 | 117 | 13.8% | |
| ✍ | 43 | 5.06% | |
| 👻 | 37 | 4.36% | |
| 😁 | 35 | 4.12% | |
| 🌚 | 28 | 3.30% | |
| 😢 | 23 | 2.71% | |
| 🕊 | 21 | 2.47% | |
| 🗿 | 21 | 2.47% | |
| 👨💻 | 18 | 2.12% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 2.00% | |
| 😴 | 17 | 2.00% | |
| 😱 | 15 | 1.77% | |
| 🏆 | 11 | 1.30% | |
| 😎 | 10 | 1.18% | |
| 🤯 | 10 | 1.18% | |
| 🆒 | 9 | 1.06% | |
| 🐳 | 6 | 0.707% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 0.707% | |
| 3 further kinds | 8 | 0.942% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 849 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFHSwujo | 1 | 6 August 2026 | 6 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 30 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Lada Azimut будет стоить около 2 млн рублей. За эти деньги россияне получат автомобиль с инновационной системой подогрева передних боковых стёкол. Официальную стоимость пока не объявили, однако до старта продаж остаётся около месяца. Ранее в АвтоВАЗе заявили, что Lada Azimut «создаёт вся страна».
💊7
Россиян будут штрафовать за пентаграммы, изображения сатаны*, «число дьявола», перевёрнутые кресты и другие пугающие символы на Хэллоуин. За год вынесли более 100 постановлений за публичную демонстрацию такой символики. *Движение сатанизма признано в РФ экстремистским и запрещено.
Нейросети официально стали умнее врачей: ИИ от Microsoft ставит диагнозы точнее врачей общей практики, показало исследование, опубликованное в журнале Science. Система самостоятельно опрашивает пациентов, назначает обследования и проверяет диагнозы. В сложных случаях ИИ показал точность 83% против 36% у врачей, а в обычных — 80% против 47%. При этом затраты на обследования оказались ниже.
Криптобиржа HTX уходит из России. Это уже третья крупная криптобиржа за последний месяц, которая прекращает работу с российскими пользователями.
😱1
Главным символом успеха у зумеров-мужчин стал игровой ПК — так считают 28% опрошенных россиян. На втором месте оказалась машина. У девушек главным показателем успеха стала горнолыжная одежда, а следом — дизайнерская сумка. Собственную квартиру символом успеха назвали только 9% респондентов.
🤯1
Доллар упал до 80 рублей по официальному курсу ЦБ впервые с 6 августа.
Индекс Мосбиржи резко пошёл вверх на фоне новости о прекращении огня между Россией и Украиной в районе Алёшек.
ЦБ предупредил о рисках ускорения инфляции в России. По оценке Банка России, факторы, способные разогнать рост цен, сейчас преобладают над теми, которые могут его замедлить.
Льготную ипотеку в России нужно ограничивать, а её объёмы не должны расти, заявила глава Центробанка Эльвира Набиуллина.
💊1
ЦБ резко повысил прогноз средней ключевой ставки на 2027 год — теперь он составляет 12,5–13,5% вместо прежних 10,5–12,5%. После объявления решения Центробанка индекс Мосбиржи резко пошёл вниз.
ЦБ России снова сохранил ключевую ставку на уровне 14%.
Льготную айти-ипотеку хотят отменить для россиян. Власти обсуждают завершение льготной программы уже в этом году, сообщают СМИ. Минцифры рассматривает варианты финансирования программы в условиях «ограниченного бюджета».
Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @cyberpunk_for_us. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 5 posts on @cyberpunk_for_us as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AI Новости Киберпанк который мы заслужили” (@cyberpunk_for_us), 5,908 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyberpunk_for_us.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.