Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CyberTalk | Standoff 2

Channel

CyberTalk | Standoff 2

@cybertalk_official

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,521subscribers

-292 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001824052402
TypeChannel
Username@cybertalk_official
DescriptionПо коммерческим вопросам - @cybertalkadmin Наш тг по CS2 - @cybertalk_cs2 № 5050155505
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/cybertalk_official

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

219,0349,5187 August 2026 — 18,813 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,813 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,808 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,906 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,946 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,936 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,939 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,921 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,916 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18,946 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,927 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,926 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,923 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,900 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,879 subscribers22 August 2026 — 18,869 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,831 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,991 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,016 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,022 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,034 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,005 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,965 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,916 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,887 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,029 subscribers3 September 2026 — 18,976 subscribers5 September 2026 — 18,938 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2 subscribers17 September 2026 — 18,903 subscribers28 September 2026 — 18,821 subscribers5 October 2026 — 18,682 subscribers9 October 2026 — 18,608 subscribers13 October 2026 — 18,533 subscribers14 October 2026 — 18,490 subscribers16 October 2026 — 18,483 subscribers16 October 2026 — 18,458 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,432 subscribers18 October 2026 — 18,420 subscribers20 October 2026 — 18,399 subscribers21 October 2026 — 18,387 subscribers22 October 2026 — 18,383 subscribers23 October 2026 — 18,378 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,363 subscribers25 October 2026 — 18,331 subscribers26 October 2026 — 18,312 subscribers27 October 2026 — 18,302 subscribers28 October 2026 — 18,287 subscribers29 October 2026 — 18,270 subscribers30 October 2026 — 18,261 subscribers31 October 2026 — 18,248 subscribers1 November 2026 — 18,223 subscribers2 November 2026 — 18,206 subscribers3 November 2026 — 18,474 subscribers4 November 2026 — 18,521 subscribers18,5217 August 20264 November 2026
55 measurements spanning 89 days, net -292. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 20:5018,521+47
3 Nov 2026, 21:2618,474+268
2 Nov 2026, 21:1718,206-17
1 Nov 2026, 20:0918,223-25
31 Oct 2026, 17:0618,248-13
30 Oct 2026, 19:2018,261-9
29 Oct 2026, 16:0918,270-17
28 Oct 2026, 15:4118,287-15
27 Oct 2026, 15:0518,302-10
26 Oct 2026, 13:3518,312-19
25 Oct 2026, 16:2018,331-32
24 Oct 2026, 12:5718,363-15
23 Oct 2026, 09:3018,378-5
22 Oct 2026, 11:5818,383-4
21 Oct 2026, 07:2818,387-12
20 Oct 2026, 02:1118,399-21
18 Oct 2026, 22:4018,420-12
17 Oct 2026, 22:1918,432-26
16 Oct 2026, 21:4918,458-25
16 Oct 2026, 01:1918,483first reading

Engagement

313 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.3%
avg views ÷ 18,521 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,020
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 313 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held313 (5 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total148,060
Reactions total2,442
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 03:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈9,210
Videos
≈521
Links
≈2,250

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 45s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

31,576 reactions across 313 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤22,83272.3%
🔥2,4197.66%
🤣1,6585.25%
⚡1,0443.31%
👍1,0353.28%
😢1,0093.20%
😱9533.02%
🥰4031.28%
😁1630.516%
👌600.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 313 of the 313 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31,576 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 313 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 313 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cybertalk_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 313 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 24 of 49 posts held from the last 30 days (49.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 18:55 UTC≈1,310 views42 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

⚫ X TEAM ПОБЕЖДАЮТ В ЭТОЙ ВСТРЕЧЕ! ✊ Mafiozy покидают турнир! 🟣 CyberTalk. Подписаться

🔥32❤6⚡4

4 Nov 2026, 18:02 UTC≈1,720 views28 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

⚫ X TEAM ПЕРЕВОДЯТ НА ДЕСАЙДЕР! 🟣 CyberTalk. Подписаться

❤24🔥3⚡1

4 Nov 2026, 17:55 UTC≈1,810 views28 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ ДОПЫ! 🟣 CyberTalk. Подписаться

❤24🥰3⚡1

4 Nov 2026, 16:51 UTC≈2,090 views41 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

✊ MAFIOZY ПОБЕЖДАЮТ НА ПЕРВОЙ КАРТЕ! 🟣 CyberTalk. Подписаться

❤32🔥4⚡3🥰1😢1

4 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC≈2,250 views38 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

👍 XGLOW ПОБЕЖДАЮТ В ЭТОЙ ВСТРЕЧЕ! 🐉 DragonborN покидают турнир! 🟣 CyberTalk. Подписаться

❤26😢6⚡5🥰1

4 Nov 2026, 15:07 UTC≈2,470 views41 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

👍 XGLOW ПОБЕЖДАЮТ НА ПЕРВОЙ КАРТЕ! 🟣 CyberTalk. Подписаться

❤32⚡5😢3👍1

4 Nov 2026, 14:51 UTC≈2,590 views55 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🔵 CYBERSHOKE собрались на буткемп перед Epic Jumble Rumble Major #2 🟣 CyberTalk. Подписаться

❤44🤣7🔥4

4 Nov 2026, 13:52 UTC≈2,620 views47 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🥂 Совсем скоро начнется первая игра сегодняшнего игрового дня, ну и по традиции сравнение 👀 Сравним двух лучших игроков от обеих команд. fl1qu moggает, да? 🟣 CyberTalk. Подписаться

❤42😱3🔥2

4 Nov 2026, 13:01 UTC≈2,650 views29 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤22👍4🔥3

4 Nov 2026, 11:00 UTC≈2,970 views62 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

😍 Hi-Lo высказался по поводу своей личной отыгровки 🟣 Тут много факторов: новые тиммейты, из-за которых нужно перестраиваться и менять свою игру, недостаток тренировочного процесса (лень, плотное расписание, отмены праков) и мое непонимание того, что нужно выйти из зоны комфорта. Ну, в общем-то не сильно провалился, матчи с КХ тяжелые были или на слабеньких командах не выделялся никак, но в основном выключался тольк…

❤55👍5🥰2

4 Nov 2026, 09:05 UTC≈3,230 views70 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

😡 PLA1NT ЯВНО НЕ ДОВОЛЕН СВОЕЙ КОМАНДОЙ 😍 Дима прокомментировал игру своей команды на турнире 🟣 Закончился мажорчик для нас, допустил ошибку в шафлах за что и поплатился. В этом мире нужно быть эгоистом и на всех х*й класть что бы побеждать, иначе если ты слишком добрый - то тебе сядут на шею и свесят ножки. Думал, что смогу людей заставить прогрессировать, но они на удивление начинают деградировать. Ху**ый турик д…

❤61😢4🤣3🔥1🥰1

4 Nov 2026, 07:27 UTC≈3,290 views68 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

👍 Yes Team : – 😍 wyrdin 🟣 CyberTalk. Подписаться

😢49❤13🔥5👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 313 posts we hold for @cybertalk_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @cybertalk_official as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
2 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
2 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
21 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ВАКНОС
@waqnosehub · 31,499
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 4 September 2026
Веля
@velyamedia · 150,803
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 12 August 2026
Union | Standoff 2
@union_standoff2 · 25,293
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 September 2026
EPIC STANDOFF 2
@epic_standoff2 · 26,612
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 September 2026
Apollon 🗿
@apollon_tg · 48,355
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 26 August 2026
Global News — Новости Стандофф 2
@global_news_so2 · 19,943
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 September 2026
Virtus.pro Mobile
@virtuspro_mobile · 20,243
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 September 2026
BEHOLDER 🏚️
@beholderStandoff2 · 42,770
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 27 August 2026
GentlemaN
@artyom_gentleman · 90,215
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 August 2026
Standoff 2
@play_standoff2 · 1,706,078
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 August 2026
Standoff 2 Esports
@so2esp · 93,876
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
STKILL SQUAD
@stkill_squad · 46,755
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 August 2026
L1berty
@L1bertyNewEra · 23,150
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 September 2026
NemajorniyOfficial
@NemajorniyOfficial · 81,935
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 25 August 2026
Москва: Что нового?
@Nez1k44 · 38,334
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 29 August 2026
mellonty
@mellonty · 35,057
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 9 September 2026
Rad1umofficial🧪
@rad1umofficial · 19,561
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 28 September 2026
Dat1xx
@dat1xx1 · 20,818
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 1 October 2026
ШАМПУНЕВ
@shampunevv · 26,158
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 15 September 2026
Brawl Stars | Бравл Старс Новости
@brawlstars_skachat · 62,105
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 23 August 2026
Семья Berserkers 😈
@Berserkers_nt · 75,030
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 19 August 2026
aboven
@abovenwav · 87,542
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 17 August 2026
Virtus.pro
@virtuspro · 24,570
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
Мамонт So2
@MamontTELEGA · 61,463
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CyberTalk | Standoff 2” (@cybertalk_official), 18,521 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cybertalk_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.