Channel
@cyclopsfucker
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
95subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002097555371 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cyclopsfucker |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cyclopsfucker |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 95 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 94 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 96 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 97 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 97 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
195 reactions across 16 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5260595254037326344 | 40 | 20.5% | |
| ❤ | 29 | 14.9% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5884184433371649001 | 22 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5305533161847933622 | 14 | 7.18% | |
| custom 5296669410205900740 | 13 | 6.67% | |
| custom 5305362509912363182 | 10 | 5.13% | |
| custom 5474240860214290383 | 10 | 5.13% | |
| 💘 | 9 | 4.62% | |
| 💋 | 8 | 4.10% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 3.08% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 2.05% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 1.54% | |
| custom 5368493229173927390 | 1 | 0.513% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.513% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.513% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 0.513% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 195 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/perehodnikotvetki В общем недавно на моего лучшего бро и ещё пары людей был выложен документ, обвиняющий в травле Но ребята оперативно собрали целый тгк с опровержением этого документа с подкрепленными пруфами, показав всю историю, а не только лишь вырезанную удобную часть, как было в том доке И можете сами со всем ознакомиться
custom 52605952540373263444custom 53055331618479336222🔥1custom 53684932291739273901
ГОЛОСУЕМ ЗА АМБУС!!!!!!
Posted without readable text
Чтож первый раунд был успешно проебан, но Карамель довольно хорошо держался на удивление Думаю, в буфете для проигравших он не сильно будет горевать А за тем и немного инфы про него, чтобы хоть знали кто это или хотя бы вспомнили, если забыли зря писал чтоле.. Он очень хитёр, расчётлив и умëн, всегда старается действовать осторожно и получать то, что ему нужно и что для него выгоднее всего, к тому же всегда умудряет…
❤9💘3custom 52966694102059007402custom 53053625099123631821
Можете накидать вопросов ему а я постараюсь нарисовать всякие ответике за него Будет такой типо мини аск если вам интересно😮 И УЖЕ СКОРО Я ЛЕЧУ ДОМОЙЙ Буквально через несколько минут уже вылет.. ПОЭТОМУ Я ОЧЕНЬ НАДЕЮСЬ И ВЕРЮ В ВАШИ СИЛЫ🫵
🔥5
Случились неполадки, ИБО ТГ ГАВНО Поэтому голосование было перезалито НО!!!!!!! ГОЛОСОВАТЬ МОГУТ АБСОЛЮТНО ВСЕ!!!!!!!! Вне зависимости подписаны вы или нет ПОЭТОМУ ОТ ВСЕГО СЕРДЦА ПРОШУ ВАС ВНОВЬ ОТДАТЬ СВОЙ ГОЛОС ЗА КАРАМЕЛЯ Ибо именно в нём он нуждается больше всего и именно благодаря ВАМ🫵 может измениться исход голосования
🔥4
Posted without readable text
😇1
И простите, что сдох на месяц напрочь Ещë и в Питер съездил молча.. Но уже завтра лечу домой с новыми силами и идеями для картинок и скетчей с осиками смешне!!!!
💘6
🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🌟 Помогал бести с анимкой для кж👊👊💥💥💥 Я не особо профессионал в анимации и для первого опыта думаю неплохо Рисовал я а работа со звуком моего бро Качество было лучше я не знаю почему тут такая хуйня😭
custom 53053625099123631826custom 53055331618479336224custom 52966694102059007403
вроде и хорошо вышло, а вроде и не .не могу понять но я добро атакую сахара https://artfight.net/~Caxap #artfight
custom 53055331618479336225🔥2👀1
🧄Ой артфайт да артфайт блин даа блиннннн артфайт🧄 ⚠️https://artfight.net/~Caxap Кстати можете и свои профили скинуть возможно порисую вам чего нибудь🫦 ОТПИЗДИТЕ МЕНЯ УМОЛЯЮ😫
❤8🍓3custom 52605952540373263442👀1
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩😭😭😭😭💙🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Хотел сделать штуку для артфайта, а получилось прикольно, мне даже очень нравится😊 Кстати, можете репостнуть, а мне будет очень приятно🧄🧄 Я старался над этой штукой😛
❤8💋8🕊6custom 52966694102059007402custom 54742408602142903832👀1💅1custom 53055331618479336221
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @cyclopsfucker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“☎👁Циклопоебальня👁☎” (@cyclopsfucker), 95 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyclopsfucker.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.