Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 59 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 465–474 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Oct 2026, 04:29
467
-4
22 Oct 2026, 13:56
471
-2
15 Oct 2026, 13:04
473
+6
8 Oct 2026, 00:38
467
+1
27 Sept 2026, 05:40
466
-2
31 Aug 2026, 15:24
468
+2
30 Aug 2026, 18:45
466
no change
30 Aug 2026, 18:30
466
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
33 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
25
75.8%
👍
8
24.2%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2024 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🛡 مستند فنی و متودولوژی کاهش سطح مواجهه (Digital Attack Surface Reduction)
ویژه: کارشناسان شبکه، توسعهدهندگان و متخصصین امنیت
ارائهشده توسط: cyber eagle security
این راهنما بر اساس فاز Reconnaissance در استانداردهای بینالمللی تست نفوذ تنظیم شده است. اجرا و پیادهسازی این ۵ گام، نشتهای اطلاعاتی شما را در سطح اینترنت به حداقل میرساند.
───
📍 گام اول: پایش و آنالیز نشت کریدنشالها (Credential Breach Audit)
مهاجمان…
Predator spyware hooks iOS SpringBoard to hide mic, camera activity
Intellexa's Predator spyware can hide iOS recording indicators while secretly streaming camera and microphone feeds to its operators. [...]
🔗 https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/predator-spyware-hooks-ios-springboard-to-hide-mic-camera-activity/
🔹@cygle
✍️ Notepad++ has released a security fix to plug gaps that were exploited by an advanced threat actor from China to hijack the software update mechanism to selectively deliver malware to targets of interest.
🔗 https://thehackernews.com/2026/02/notepad-fixes-hijacked-update-mechanism.html
🔹@cygle
CVE-2026-2019
The Cart All In One For WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Code Injection in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.21. This is due to insufficient input validation on the 'Assign page' field which is passed directly to the eval() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to execute arbitrary PHP code on the server.
https://p…
هکرهای مرتبط با دولت روسیه از آسیب پذیری روز صفر CVE-2026-21509 در محصولات Office علیه اهدافی در اوکراین، اسلواکی و رومانی و لهستان استفاده کردند.
https://www.zscaler.com/blogs/security-research/apt28-leverages-cve-2026-21509-operation-neusploit
🔐
در امنیت سایبری، مهمترین نقطهای که هکرها برنده میشوند، مرحله اطلاعاتجمعکنی (Recon) است.
اگر این مرحله را بلد نباشی، هیچ ابزار و هیچ مدرکی کمکت نمیکند.
در این ریلز درباره ذهنیت درست هکرها، Active Scanning، و اینکه چرا نقطه شروع شما ۹۰٪ نتیجه را تعیین میکند صحبت میکنم.
اگر مسیر حرفهای امنیت را میسازی، این ویدیو پایهایترین بخش آن است.
ویدیو کامل در کانال یوتیوب . لینک در بیو 🔗
#BugBounty #cybetsecurity #…
❤2
Signed Support 🗨️
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cygle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
تقویت زبان - آموزش آیلتس @BestIELTS · 23,991 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 16 September 2026
شعر نو @sheereno · 39,630 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
رائفے پور (غیر رسمی) @ostadaliakbarraefipour · 35,799 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CYBER EAGLE” (@cygle), 467 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cygle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.