Channel
@dUnhelll
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
—subscribers
| Telegram ID | -1001850256971 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dUnhelll |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 8 July 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dUnhelll |
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
19 posts held, back to 8 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 20 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
afkar mvk¹ @mj0kbg read the whisper
Photo, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤ ㅤ ʚ t.me/mj0kbg ɞ hallouu-bellouuu kak afkaar! yeaay, selamat yaa karenaa kakak mendapatkan board dari aily. aily haraap kakak suka sama boardnya yaa. selamat membacaaa, choo-choo! 🚂🚂 ✿ buttercup ⦂ kesaan pertama yang aily dapatkan begitu mengenal kak afkar ituu kak afkar terlihat sangaat cool daan juga sangaat menarik! + aily akaan berikaan kakak rate 10000/10 untuk set-up kakak yang kereen seka…
♡ ❍ ⌲ •• ⎙ Liked by @sngziyouing and 119.900 others 🗳 yang nt nt aja ini mah "siyap menjadi badutmu untuk menemani gabut mu hhh 🤡🤟🏻" @simsziyoung @KarinhaYoo @nctmaknaej @DFiksional @GadisBerseri @playstatioln @mj0kbg @putrikeecilayahh @Motrdel @Skyhigt @Muhadsabah @HongSnzu @dickphorn @gmJisoo @ningyidzhou @GllSELL View all 88.000 comments 1 minutes ago • See Translation ─────────────────…
afkar mvk¹ @mj0kbg
File, posted without a caption
t.me/mj0kbg Anantasia : aku suka cara kamu interaksi bareng moots, kaya asik banget gitu keliatan nyaa. + dibawah ya. Clariette : ch, KEREN betul. + kill. yu sama sama ngekill hehheeh. Ellierays : aku liat liat, afkar ni tipikal orang yang galak betul. keren juga sii, asikk. Martinez : attractive, cool, humble. + aku ship km dengan eunchae.
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔒 A whisper message to mj0kbg, Only he/she can open it.
ੈ ♡ @.mj0kbg FI : First Impression for u, kamu orangnya cool trus kalem gitu.
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @dUnhelll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“Archive” (@dUnhelll). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dUnhelll.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.