Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝗗𝗔𝗙𝗧𝗔π—₯ π—›π—œπ—§π—”π—  π—©π—”π—‘π——π—˜π—₯𝗀𝗨𝗔𝗦𝗧

Channel

𝗗𝗔𝗙𝗧𝗔π—₯ π—›π—œπ—§π—”π—  π—©π—”π—‘π——π—˜π—₯𝗀𝗨𝗔𝗦𝗧

@daftarhitamvanders

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

1subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003809896332
TypeChannel
Username@daftarhitamvanders
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded22 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/daftarhitamvanders

Growth

122 Aug 2026, 14:46 β€” 1 subscribers24 Aug 2026, 02:45 β€” 1 subscribers22 Aug 2026, 14:4624 Aug 2026, 02:45
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 02:451no change
22 Aug 2026, 14:461first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 22 August 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
3383.3%
avg views Γ· 1 subscribers
Avg views / post
33.8
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
β€”
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held12 (22 August 2026 – 22 August 2026)
Views total406
Reactions totalβ€”
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC33 viewsread 22 August 2026

Terimakasih untuk para rekan Vanderquast yang membantu jalannya penyelesaian tindak copy paste/plagiarisme ini. Kami berharap tidak ada yang saling menimbulkan kebencian antara pihak Vanderquast & Verdict 1920.

22 Aug 2026, 02:14 UTC34 viewsread 22 August 2026

Kami berharap kejadian seperti ini lagi tidak akan terulang kembali. Dan pastinya pihak keamanan kami juga akan meminimalisir dan melakukan pengecekkan ulang terkait siapa pun yang bergabung diranah Verdict 1920

22 Aug 2026, 02:14 UTC34 viewsread 22 August 2026

Sesuai dengan wewenang yang berlaku, konsekuensi blacklist yang terdata ialah: 1. Jika ingin menjadi member Vanderquast, maka tidak diperbolehkan masuk jika ia adalah salah satu member Verdict 1920. Begitupun sebaliknya. Jika ingin menjadi member Verdict 1920, maka tidak diperbolehkan masuk jika ia adalah salah satu member Vanderquast. 2. Member ataupun admin yang masuk di kedua squad, harus memilih salah satu untu…

22 Aug 2026, 02:10 UTC34 viewsread 22 August 2026

pem blacklist an yang terjadi bukan bermaksud untuk menjatuhkan squad VERDICT 1920. tetapi atas dasar keinginan pihak VANDERQUAST agar tak lagi berurusan dengan pihak mreka.

22 Aug 2026, 02:07 UTC34 viewsread 22 August 2026
Photo

6. Pihak VANDERQUAST memutuskan untuk saling BLACKLIST dengan pihak VERDICT 1920. Keputusan saling blacklist yang terjadi sudah dipaparkan oleh cfo VANDERQUAST itu sendiri

22 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC36 viewsread 22 August 2026

diskusi terkait keputusan yang berlaku tentang konsekuensi yang akan diterima oleh pihak VERDICT 1920

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @daftarhitamvanders. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ——π—”π—™π—§π—”π—₯ π—›π—œπ—§π—”π—  π—©π—”π—‘π——π—˜π—₯𝗀𝗨𝗔𝗦𝗧” (@daftarhitamvanders), 1 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daftarhitamvanders.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.