» new take сш из севастополя/крыма? #anontake ' @dainsleifslover поиск сш 3/5
Signed mindfulness

Channel
@dainsleifslover
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,684subscribers
+401 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001779785950 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dainsleifslover |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dainsleifslover |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 3,684 | +77 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 3,607 | +46 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 3,561 | +44 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 3,517 | +38 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:44 | 3,479 | +17 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 3,462 | +43 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 3,419 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 3,417 | +45 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:12 | 3,372 | +13 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 3,359 | +39 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 3,320 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:19 | 3,317 | +30 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 3,287 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 3,283 | first reading |
35 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 35 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
437 reactions across 29 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 236 | 54.0% | |
| 👎 | 179 | 41.0% | |
| 🤔 | 22 | 5.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 437 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
» new take сш из севастополя/крыма? #anontake ' @dainsleifslover поиск сш 3/5
Signed mindfulness
» new take есть сшипперы с персонажами из новелл по милграму? #anontake ' @dainsleifslover поиск сш 2/5
👎2
Signed mindfulness
тв/кв намёк на нсфв/цсэм, пдф » new take здравствуйте, хотелось бы освятить ситуацию, что кто-то хочет либо снести мне канал, либо просто желает меня затриггерить, не проявляя себя уже в течение месяца-два. возможно с такой ситуацией сталкивалась не одна я, в таком случае я не против получить совет, спасибо. ───────────────────── даты указаны на картинках, как и часть ситуации с рассылкой и приходу ботов (возможно,…
👍12👎3
Signed mindfulness
» new take Здравствуйте, помогите пожалуйста, я незнаю что делать и как быть. Моя подруга, которую я считаю очень близкой взяла заказ (кмм) у моего даблла нонша. Когда я сама так же являюсь ноншейрингом. Мне стало как то обидно от того что она выбрала деньги а не меня и мои чувства. Мой даблл я думаю знал о том что она моя мью, сапп и близкий человек... #anontake ' @dainsleifslover
👍4
Signed mindfulness
» new take дарова подслушары , знаю , что возможно тут обсосали эту тему 10 раз , но мне интересно ваше мнение на это я сш с персонажем которому канонически 14 лет . мы ровесники , но бля мне стремно что я столкнусь к негативу в свою сторону , хоть и говорю , что в срвоих неких канонах сш моя сона и перс достигли возраста согласия .. я идк меня будут за это душить ?? или норм ?? а еще авторы не поддерживают сш и люб…
🤔4
Signed mindfulness
» new take У каких сш на ваш взгляд самые красивые коммишены? #anontake ' @dainsleifslover
Signed mindfulness
» new take Здравствуйте!! Первый раз пишу тейк, но мне интересно узнать можно ли быть ноншейром и при этом нейтрально относится к даблам? #anontake ' @dainsleifslover
👍7
Signed mindfulness
поздравьте мою гф
👎11👍3
Signed Дайнслейф
с днем рождения, дайнслейф 💙🥺....
👍30👎4
Signed Дайнслейф
» new take Здравствуйте, подслушка. Хотела бы обратить ваше внимание на Досю, сш с Рюноскэ Акутагавой, которая сначала предложила мне мьюсапп, а потом я вышла у неё тупорылой пиздой. Вся ситуация расписана на скринах. Неанон Рена Итальянец.🧺🇮🇹 #take ' @dainsleifslover
👍27👎2
Signed mindfulness
» new take https://t.me/dainsleifslover/22790 мне очень стыдно за то что я натворила . я признаю что мой поступок отвратительный и что мне нужно перестать таким заниматься . приношу извинения за содеянное и впредь постараюсь сделать всё чтобы это не повторялось . неанон Стефи . #take ' @dainsleifslover
👎28👍7
Signed ㅤㅤㅤㅤ
» new take активные влв селфшипы/осканон? #anontake ' @dainsleifslover
Signed ㅤㅤㅤㅤ
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @dainsleifslover. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“» сшкм подслушары” (@dainsleifslover), 3,684 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dainsleifslover.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.