Channel
@daiquiri
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
315subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001526742067 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @daiquiri |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/daiquiri |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 315 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 319 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:09 | 320 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 321 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 321 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
99 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 37 | 37.4% | |
| ❤ | 32 | 32.3% | |
| 😎 | 14 | 14.1% | |
| 🤔 | 12 | 12.1% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 3.03% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.01% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Новенький скин, для самых дружных участников :)) https://ony.cash 😵💫 Ps. Вижу что есть активные майнеры с нулевыми счетчиками друзей, то есть - даже не использовали пригласительные для себя. А чего? Это же моментальные 300 долларов вам в оценку, плюс 10 базовых процентов к еженедельной добыче ONY (за счет открытия первого партнерского скина). Pps. Пригласительный можно найти на странице любого майнера.
❤4🔥2
Signed Di Gambler
Почему не сейчас. Потому что сейчас рано.
❤3
Signed Di Gambler
Стейк майнер-адреса в Минтере только что вырос до 46 миллионов BIP. По задумке все эти монеты когда-то перетекут в пул с ONY, возможно через год, когда к ним присоединится ещё миллионов 200. Что сделает ONY самой ликвидной монетой в Минтере.
🤔4🔥1
Signed Di Gambler
Уверен, ваши карманы уже заполнены очень перспективными монетами, которые ещё непременно дадут вам иксы, и несмотря на это вам придётся найти ещё немного свободного места. Потому что не приобрести пачку ONX в рамках нашей первой «ангельской» программы станет преступлением. Этот раунд финансирования максимально доступен большинству участников, на нём мы продадим только десятую часть эмиссии - 100 тысяч ONX, по цене 1…
🔥4❤2😎2
Signed Di Gambler
Ключевые параметры для прокачки бустера описаны здесь, но самый ключевой из них конечно же ONY. Основной упор идёт именно на эту монету.
❤3
Signed Di Gambler
10 ONY есть в майнере? Даже больше? Значит порядок - ваша прибыль стала еще на 10 процентов выше 😎 https://ony.cash Кто бустер еще не прокачивал, посчитайте сколько стоит 10 ONY и как быстро ваш майнер вам их вернет, если прибыль увеличится на 20 процентов (10 за скин одной монеты + 10 за скин десяти монет).
🔥3😎2
Signed Di Gambler
Купить уже нельзя. Продать ещё можно. https://t.me/daiquiri/3071
😎3
Signed Di Gambler
После прочтения «Большой рыбы» Дэвида Линча захотелось посмотреть пару упомянутых в его книге фильмов - «Малхоланд Драйв» и «Внутреннюю Империю» (как-то так получилось что оба этих фильма не видел). Вы скорее всего знаете что видение у Линча особенное, и если Малхоланд мне показался понятным и даже понравился, то Империя… это уже хардкор :))
😁3❤1
Signed Di Gambler
Почти полмиллиона просмотров за почти полгода жизни бинанс-блога. Наверное стоит почаще подталкивать вас на создание и ведение своих блогов в любых социальных сетях и блог-платформах. Знаю что многие (да почти все) сильно недооценивают их важность, и не видят в них необходимости. А она, необходимость, определённо есть. Задание на эти выходные - написать свой первый пост в Бинанс Сквере 😎
❤4
Signed Di Gambler
Нечасто такое у нас тут увидишь. Джокоин можно и купить по 220 бип, и продать.
🤔4
Signed Di Gambler
Блуберри, Квота и Джо. Июль 2026. За прошлый месяц продано 321.57 WTF (следить за продажей можно на этой странице), что по текущей цене ($4.71) равно 1514.59 долларам. Направляем по 10 процентов от прибыли на выкуп монет BLUEBERRY, QUOTA и JOOCOIN. Как в прошлый раз дергать рынок не будем, теперь выкуп будем производить ордерами. 7.5 миллионов BIP уже готовы выкупить ваши монеты. https://explorer.minter.network/a…
🔥4
Signed Di Gambler
Количество ONY в майнере, его доля, количество друзей и партнёрская прибыль, оставшееся время на таймере и количество собранных камней - это ключевые параметры к которым привязываются скины. И чем дальше - тем выше требования.
🔥4
Signed Di Gambler
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @daiquiri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Остров” (@daiquiri), 315 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daiquiri.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.