Jâai préparé un coupon cÃŽte 1000. Vous êtes prêts ?
- OUI BOSS59%
- Non, jâai pas encore créé mon compte 1xbet avec BUTA241%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@dalwonpronostiques
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
35,374subscribers
-2,392 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623â100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001731064022 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dalwonpronostiques |
| Description | ð¥ðð¶ð²ð»ðð²ð»ðð² ð±ð®ð»ð ð¹ð® ððŒð»ð² ððð¬ ðððððð ð¥ â Des ððšð®ð©ðšð§ð¬ ðð«Ãšð¬ ðð¢ðð§ ðð§ðð¥ð²ð¬Ã©ð¬ chaque jour. ðððšð§ð§ð-ððšð¢ ðð ð©ð«ðšðð¢ðð ð ð«ððð®ð¢ðððŠðð§ð. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 â estimated from Telegramâs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dalwonpronostiques |
Gambling & betting â a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelâs own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelâs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured â it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 18:40 | 35,374 | -103 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:37 | 35,477 | -126 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 35,603 | -97 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 35,700 | -47 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 35,747 | -178 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 35,925 | -173 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:00 | 36,098 | -105 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:56 | 36,203 | -75 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:35 | 36,278 | -70 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 36,348 | -77 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 36,425 | -73 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 36,498 | -23 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 36,521 | -56 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 36,577 | -25 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 36,602 | -75 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 36,677 | -42 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 36,719 | -109 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:44 | 36,828 | -91 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 36,919 | -50 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 36,969 | first reading |
59 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 â the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelâs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 85 pages of Telegramâs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views â note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramâs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 59 (28 July 2026 â 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 31,169 |
| Reactions total | â |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface â not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 15:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than âcorrectingâ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form â 8.12K, 3.7M â so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded â read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramâs own channel header, read 24 September 2026 â not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked â was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it â t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so â142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel â not this channelâs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramâs own rounded chrome, so it carries no â mark.
Jâai préparé un coupon cÃŽte 1000. Vous êtes prêts ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Lâargent de 1XBET est doux ð Nâessaie même pas de compter, câest trop ðž Aujourdâhui encore je vais gagner plus que ça, yâa beaucoup de bons matchs ð°ð°ð°
â â â VALIDà â â â On encaisse la famille ððž CÃTE 1069 â ðð ðððððððð ð ðð ð de gains ð Félicitations à tous ceux qui ont misés ð
Video, posted without a caption
COUPON AUTHENTIQUE CÃŽte : 1069 Code du coupon 1XBET : BKTDZ ð Pour télécharger le code du coupon, il faut créer ton compte 1XBET avec le code promo ð BUTA2 âŒïž Si tu tâinscris sans faire de dépÃŽt sur ton compte, le code ne marchera pas. ðVOICI COMMENT SâINSCRIREð https://t.me/c/1731064022/3607
Jâai préparé un coupon cÃŽte 1000 pour demain Samedi. Vous êtes prêts ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ð¥Aujourdâhui câest vendredi, jour de bonus sur 1xbet.ð¥ ð°Jâai rechargé 65.000 FCFA sur le compte que jâai créé avec le code promo BUTA2, et jâai reçu 65.000 FCFA de bonus ð±ð€ ð¯ Tout ceux qui veulent recevoir des bonus, créez un nouveau compte 1xbet avec le code promo authentique de 1xbet : BUTA2 â ðð Voici comment faire ðð â¡ïž https://t.me/c/1731064022/3607
â€Žïž Comment avoir le compte authentique ? ð¡ Crée ton compte 1XBET avec le seul et unique code promo BUTA2 pour bénéficier de ses avantages. ð¡ AprÚs lâinscription, effectue un dépÃŽt minimum de 5000 FCFA et reçoit directement un bonus de 130.000 FCFA + 50% de remboursement de pertes chaque mardi 𥳠INSCRIS-TOI VIA CE LIEN !! ‵ïžâ€µïžâ€µïž ðªðº WWW.1XBET.COM
ðð ðéð«ðš à ðéð«ðšð¬ Les paris sportifs ont changé ma vie et celles de beaucoup de personnes dans ce canal. La base ? Câest dâavoir un compte authentique. Mon secret⊠BUTA2 ð forever Ensemble, chacun va atteindre les millions dans ce canal, câest lâAfrique qui gagne â€ïž
â â â VALIDà â â â On encaisse la famille ððž CÃTE 340 â Félicitations à tous ceux qui ont créés leur compte 1XBET avec le code promo BUTA2 ð Perso, jâai encaissé ð ðððððððð ð ðð ð ð
â PERDU â CR7 et son équipe ð€Šðœââïž
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @dalwonpronostiques. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked â was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it â t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so â1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollâs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Jâai préparé un coupon cÃŽte 1000. Vous êtes prêts ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Jâai préparé un coupon cÃŽte 1000 pour demain Samedi. Vous êtes prêts ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only â there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionâs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionâs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind â an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results â and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason â naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides â the âNamed by N registered channelsâ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegramâs own answer, not this registerâs. When this register asks Telegramâs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it â never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramâs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramâs recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register â how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly â each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseâs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 50 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramâs list for THAT channel, not this one â see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 â this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
âDALWON ðžð³ðšð®ð§ð«â (@dalwonpronostiques), 35,374 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dalwonpronostiques.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.