Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Подвал Дамбона 😈

Channel

Подвал Дамбона 😈

@dambonsk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

15,758subscribers

-743 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001826414750
TypeChannel
Username@dambonsk
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dambonsk

Growth

15,75816,50116,129.57 August 2026 — 16,501 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,497 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,469 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,453 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,425 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,401 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,378 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,331 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,291 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,262 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,235 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,208 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,185 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,149 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,080 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,034 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,000 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,978 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,963 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,941 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,914 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,893 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,860 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,810 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,784 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,758 subscribers7 August 20264 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 28 days, net -743. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,647–16,612 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 11:4115,758-26
3 Sept 2026, 00:3215,784-26
1 Sept 2026, 19:3515,810-50
31 Aug 2026, 16:4615,860-33
30 Aug 2026, 16:3715,893-21
29 Aug 2026, 20:1315,914-27
28 Aug 2026, 23:0415,941-22
27 Aug 2026, 22:4615,963-15
27 Aug 2026, 00:3815,978-22
26 Aug 2026, 01:5516,000-34
25 Aug 2026, 04:5416,034-46
23 Aug 2026, 23:3416,080-69
22 Aug 2026, 03:5316,149-36
20 Aug 2026, 18:2816,185-23
19 Aug 2026, 17:0516,208-27
18 Aug 2026, 16:2216,235-27
17 Aug 2026, 15:2916,262-29
16 Aug 2026, 06:2216,291-40
14 Aug 2026, 14:4616,331-47
13 Aug 2026, 02:0416,378first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 24 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.55%
avg views ÷ 15,758 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,190
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held37 (24 May 20262 September 2026)
Views total22,618
Reactions total484
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,059 reactions across 36 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,60277.8%
😢1346.51%
💔1155.59%
👍954.61%
🤯331.60%
🤣291.41%
🤔271.31%
😁150.729%
🎄50.243%
😍20.097%
😎20.097%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,059 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 37 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dambonsk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 May 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 19:26 UTC358 views37 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

😳 Roblox вернёт старый сайт! В честь 20-летия игры разработчики добавят сайт в стиле 2016 года — он будет доступен временно 🔥 — это имба!

30👍3🤔3😢1

1 Sept 2026, 12:48 UTC671 views73 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🚫 Roblox рухнул в России — пользователи жалуются на подключения к серверам, приложению или сайту. ❤️ — у меня всё работает

61💔10😁2

1 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC657 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Всех поздравляю с первым днём лета!

9😢7

31 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC838 views38 reactionsread 3 September 2026

завтра первый день лета, вы рады?

😢30💔42👍1😁1

31 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC819 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @spoteeqPhoto

🎁 SPOTEEQ РАЗЫГРЫВАЕТ 20 000 ROBUX! Устраиваем большой розыгрыш для всех поклонников Roblox — выберем 20 победителей, и каждый получит по 1 000 ROBUX 🔥 Чтобы участвовать: ✔️ Подпишись на @spoteeq ✔️ Нажми кнопку «Участвую» Готово — теперь ты в игре! 👀 Не хочешь ждать результатов? ROBUX уже можно выгодно пополнить на сайте Spoteeq ⚡️ 🔴 Победителей объявим 9 сентября в нашем Telegram-канале. Всем удачи! Возможно,

8

29 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC345 views16 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Наши друзья - Банка Пэй запустили ежедневные розыгрыши Robux🔥 Каждый день будет сразу три победителя: 🥇 1 место - 1 500 Robux 🥈 2 место - 1 000 Robux 🥉 3 место - 500 Robux Переходи и участвуй🔥

8👍3🤯3😍2

28 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC427 views8 reactions1 Starread 30 August 2026

1500 РОБУКСОВ ( КОДОМ ) либо БЕСПЛАТНЫЙ БРАВЛ ПАСС в BRAWL STARS Для участие вам надо: 1. Поставить лайк на ролик — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcGzrVE3lkQ 2. Написать любой комментарий под роликом ( всё будет проверятся )

8

25 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC≈1,750 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

☄️ Roblox УМЕР в России — игроки в панике закидывают жалобы на даундетектор у вас всё работает?

🤔192

25 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC≈1,620 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

😨 Больше никакого TikTok в режимах! Roblox запретили бесконечную ленту контента внутри игр — в Steal an Egg, допустим, использовали эту механику, а также выдавали награды игрокам за просмотр для того, чтобы удержать их ❤️ — ура ❤️ — бред..

31💔17

24 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC≈1,670 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Эту игру удалили с роблокса хахаха

22👍1

22 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC512 views10 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Скоро выпущу моддед Steal An Egg 🙈

7👍1😁1😢1

22 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,880 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026

чисто просто бегать за яйцами и ждать открытие, геймплея 0

👍17🤔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @dambonsk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTCAnonymous Poll124 voters

Ребят, вы играете в игру Steal An Egg?

  1. Да27%
  2. Нет81%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Подвал Дамбона 😈” (@dambonsk), 15,758 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dambonsk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.