Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 丹丹的家

Channel

丹丹的家

@dandan812927

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

142subscribers

+129 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004391203760
TypeChannel
Username@dandan812927
Created4 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dandan812927

Growth

1314277.56 August 2026 — 13 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26 subscribers16 August 2026 — 51 subscribers24 August 2026 — 95 subscribers31 August 2026 — 124 subscribers10 September 2026 — 139 subscribers18 September 2026 — 142 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 42 days, net +129. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 01:01142+3
10 Sept 2026, 11:37139+15
31 Aug 2026, 22:16124+29
24 Aug 2026, 13:3295+44
16 Aug 2026, 17:2851+25
11 Aug 2026, 08:3326no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:1626+13
6 Aug 2026, 20:1513first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💩360.0%
🤮240.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC302 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @SZYHYLSPhoto

【时间】:2026-08-08 【老师】:丹丹 【留名】:匿名 【人照】:9 【服务】:9 【态度】:9.5 【环境】:9.2 【综合】:9.18 【过程】:闲来无事,约了一手老师,这个价格也是真的无敌900pp无脑冲就完事儿了,老师在小区里面,小小的精致一个,人照基本没区别,穿着性感的衣服在门口迎接我,进门帮我更衣,赶紧去洗澡,已经迫不及待了,服务也很到位,课表上的一个都没少,后面赶紧要求带上小雨伞,出击,老师虽然比较瘦,但是屁股上肉肉的,后入是一绝,女上老师感觉很好,磨的你爽的不行 【优点】:服务态度好,性价比高pp无敌 【缺点】:老师比较瘦多吃肉

🤮2

8 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC295 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @thwbaogaoPhoto

【时间】:2026-08-07 【老师】:丹丹 【留名】:七月 【人照】:9 【颜值】:10 【身材】:9 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.17 【过程】:抽到了老师的工兵券,当天晚上就决定前往,老师指挥到地方,在小区里很安全。进门先洗澡,然后躺床上开始服务,老师的颜值很不错,身材也正正好好,口的时候也没什么齿感,途中试了几个姿势都很配合,最后传教士出货,不会催,整体过程很舒适,价格也很实惠,下次还会再来。

💩2

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @dandan812927. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“丹丹的家” (@dandan812927), 142 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dandan812927.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.