Voice message, posted without a caption
π―4β2β€2

Channel
@danscryptorants
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Posts edited after publishing Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
11,435subscribers
-124 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001631368049 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @danscryptorants |
| Description | I'm going to turn you into a Money Making Crypto God. You also must be watching my YT content: https://www.youtube.com/@Danielmcevoy/videos |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/danscryptorants |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:50 | 11,435 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:12 | 11,439 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 11,441 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:29 | 11,444 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 11,446 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 11,451 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 11,452 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 11,459 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 11,465 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 11,473 | -9 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 11,482 | -10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 11,492 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 11,502 | -8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 11,510 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 11,514 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 11,520 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 11,524 | -8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 11,532 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 11,538 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 11,544 | first reading |
50 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 29 of 31 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 50 (6 June 2026 β 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 79,358 |
| Reactions total | 833 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 00:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 3 September 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1,532 reactions across 47 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 572 | 37.3% | |
| π₯ | 346 | 22.6% | |
| π | 111 | 7.25% | |
| π | 90 | 5.87% | |
| β | 66 | 4.31% | |
| π | 52 | 3.39% | |
| β‘ | 45 | 2.94% | |
| π | 41 | 2.68% | |
| π― | 34 | 2.22% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 29 | 1.89% | |
| π | 26 | 1.70% | |
| π€― | 19 | 1.24% | |
| π€ | 16 | 1.04% | |
| π | 13 | 0.849% | |
| πΏ | 11 | 0.718% | |
| π | 9 | 0.587% | |
| π | 9 | 0.587% | |
| π | 7 | 0.457% | |
| π | 6 | 0.392% | |
| π | 5 | 0.326% | |
| 13 further kinds | 25 | 1.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 1,532 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Voice message, posted without a caption
π―4β2β€2
A realization Iβve had about what it actually takes to get unusually good results in business, investing, or really anything:
β11π4β€3π1
PONS 10x since being shared by one of the analysts in danscryptomastermind.com
π₯32π€3π2β‘1β€1π1
Infinite twap coming for hype with this premium
π13β‘5πΏ3π2
$PURR wtf
π9β‘4β€3π€2
4x on CASHCAT as well btw danscryptomastermind.com
π₯34π5β€2π2π2π€2π1π1
Voice message, posted without a caption
β€27π3
thesis overview ^
β€2π1
Posted it already on twitter, but here is one of my 0 or 100x plays for this cycle
β€36π€―9π6π3π2πΎ1π1π1
LIT 3x and counting
β€23π€―9π5β‘2π2π2π1
2x on PURR from one of our analystsπ€, probably just beginning it's rally to danscryptomastermind.com
β€20β5π3π2
Voice message, posted without a caption
π17π―12β€3β€βπ₯2β‘1π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @danscryptorants. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@danscryptorants edited 1 post after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βDaniel McEvoyπ°πβ (@danscryptorants), 11,435 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/danscryptorants.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.