Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for nooxie

Channel

nooxie

@darcysworld

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,658subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002396216422
TypeChannel
Username@darcysworld
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/darcysworld

Growth

3,6503,6663,6587 August 2026 — 3,664 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,664 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,658 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,650 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,652 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,666 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,662 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,656 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,652 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,657 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,658 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 30 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,648–3,668 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 02:143,658+1
2 Sept 2026, 11:163,657+5
30 Aug 2026, 12:053,652-4
27 Aug 2026, 11:273,656-6
24 Aug 2026, 20:243,662-4
21 Aug 2026, 06:363,666+14
17 Aug 2026, 20:333,652+2
14 Aug 2026, 17:153,650-8
11 Aug 2026, 00:473,658-6
8 Aug 2026, 05:523,664no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:023,664first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5,668 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,57945.5%
custom 52020106545794024321,00817.8%
custom 532558573708774445990415.9%
custom 52332216837032084724618.13%
custom 52197531773640634023746.60%
custom 54472911602026059563426.03%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,668 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
43
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 19 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @darcysworld. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2026 to 26 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC≈2,080 views271 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

кто понял тот понял

custom 523322168370320847220035custom 520201065457940243226custom 53255857370877444598custom 52197531773640634022

10 Jul 2026, 16:54 UTC≈4,270 views366 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всё было ради этого слайда😭 Секс, конечно, даже не сравнится с шедевром, что был в СН2, но я всё равно наслаждаюсь разговорами Вики и Голода об их «человеческой» жизни. И хоть считается кринжом хотеть детей в КР, я вижу их пару только так. Мои влажные мечты, где они вместе пошлют нахуй всех на небесах, спустятся на Землю, будут жить скуфскую жизнь в муравейнике, а из развлечений у них будет семейный поход на фудкорт

custom 520201065457940243224169custom 521975317736406340249custom 53255857370877444595custom 52332216837032084722

10 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTC≈3,180 views269 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Да не прохожу я СН3 суки!!!!!! Я кликаю до секса с Голодом, это другое!!!! Он снял большой театр ради меня и поставил условие, чтобы я там выступала

183custom 523322168370320847251custom 532558573708774445931custom 52020106545794024324

10 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC≈3,050 views276 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Прохожу СН3 ради Голода, но… я не могу с этих смехуёчков

196custom 520201065457940243244custom 521975317736406340232custom 53255857370877444594

10 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC≈2,670 views286 reactions9 Starsread 7 August 2026

Люди, которые пишут что всё написано ИИ, сами выглядят как ИИ-боты. У меня уже дёргается глаз от аргументов «Я ролю с дипсиком с рождения, я могу точно знать, где искуственный интеллект»… Блять, вы думаете, ролка с дипсиком даёт вам какую-то докторскую степень? Это лишь наоборот значит, что ваш мозг уже атрофировался, вот вы и ищете те же конструкции и сравнения, что вам знакомы. Как нужно писать, чтобы не получить

207custom 520201065457940243246custom 532558573708774445929custom 52197531773640634023custom 52332216837032084721

9 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC≈2,830 views290 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

антон атри поделился посезонным синопсисом пришествия

206custom 523322168370320847244custom 520201065457940243237custom 53255857370877444593

8 Jul 2026, 20:10 UTC≈7,720 views418 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

Лэнгли запускает историю с 6 сериями, за которые успевает показать всех основных фаворитов, второстепенных персонажей, раскрыть их мотивацию и наделить всех характерными чертами: 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮 больше одной серии не читала, от этой авторки неудивительно такой шлак видеть Шут в соавторстве выпускает полную хуйню, где за 4 серии даже не упоминается основной лор: 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 ну это всё позже раскроется, не всё сразу! История прост

287custom 520201065457940243273custom 523322168370320847235custom 532558573708774445914custom 52197531773640634029

8 Jul 2026, 20:01 UTC≈2,440 views341 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Мне иногда хочется что-то такое ужасное и резкое сказать, с чем, я знаю, не согласится 70% подписчиков здесь. И мне приходится останавливать себя, чтобы не негативить ради негатива. Но извините меня….. у нас полфандома хейтит истории ни за что, а настя нукси с бокалом дорогого просекко и со свежей клубникой — буллерша. Ну хорошо, ну пусть будет так

custom 532558573708774445923256custom 523322168370320847243custom 520201065457940243210

5 Jul 2026, 17:29 UTC≈3,350 views255 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

Топ-10 моих любимых жлл в КР (я в шоке, что такого топа ни разу не было у меня…) 1. Бонна (ПВ) — МОЯ САМАЯ НЕЖНАЯ САМАЯ СЛАДКАЯ, как-то в комментариях заметили, что мой типаж — изгои, и на жлл этот принцип тоже, видимо работает 2. Ванора (СТ) — я просто люблю нежнятинку, не вините меня, пожалуйста… СНОВА ИЗГОЙКА 3. Сара (ЛСЗ) — Тепиш новатор, конечно, в этом плане, снимаю шляпу перед гением 4. Вирджиния (ГПВ) — К

194custom 520201065457940243232custom 544729116020260595625custom 52332216837032084724

5 Jul 2026, 16:57 UTC≈2,330 views206 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @criticsrcPhoto

любимые стервы

187custom 520201065457940243214custom 54472911602026059565

5 Jul 2026, 13:33 UTC≈2,600 views252 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Почему вы все поддакиваете😭😭😭 Я сама играю, хоть и с перерывами, с 2019, но меня достали все эти «олды», которые рассказывают об ушедших временах, как бабки из СССР. А вот они через болото в школу добирались, не то что сейчас! Это же слепая ностальгия и только. Тогда к КР были низкие ожидания, но теперь они разрослись, аудитория выросла и, соответственно, люди хотят более ответственного подхода к выпуску контента. С

168custom 544729116020260595644custom 520201065457940243235custom 52332216837032084725

5 Jul 2026, 13:03 UTC≈2,300 views395 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Каким же нежным стал фдкр😂😂😂 Один фаворит им разонравился, у другого возраст не годится, третий — проблематичный, видите ли 🤦🏻‍♀️ Слушайте, дамы, а вот в НАШЕ время у нас фаворитами были Аарон, Вишня, ЧВМ. И ничего, никто не жаловался!!! Мы в то время последний алмаз без соли доедали, копили на сцену с Виктором годами. Задержки обнов доходили до нескольких месяцев, мы сидели смирно в уголочке, никто и пикнуть что-то

300custom 520201065457940243255custom 523322168370320847230custom 532558573708774445910

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @darcysworld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“nooxie” (@darcysworld), 3,658 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/darcysworld.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.