Всем привет, надеюсь на возвращение, учусь тут делать эдиты через нейронку, анимации (хотел делать сам, но нет, я не вывезу такие анимации рисовать). Как вам ?
🔥4🤔1

Channel
@dark54321
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
41subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002412428433 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dark54321 |
| Description | Автор темного фэнтези. Тёмные истории, скрытые детали персонажей и то, что не прошло цензуру TikTok.Добро пожаловать |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dark54321 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 41 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 41 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 28 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
79 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 30.4% | |
| ✍ | 11 | 13.9% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 13.9% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 10.1% | |
| 😘 | 6 | 7.59% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 5.06% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 3.80% | |
| 👾 | 3 | 3.80% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 3.80% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 2.53% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 2.53% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.27% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dark54321. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 January 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Всем привет, надеюсь на возвращение, учусь тут делать эдиты через нейронку, анимации (хотел делать сам, но нет, я не вывезу такие анимации рисовать). Как вам ?
🔥4🤔1
🌙 Конкурс рассказов — «О тех, кого мы не смогли забыть» Когда-то именно чужие истории вдохновили меня начать писать самому. Книги, игры, персонажи, чьи-то мысли и чувства — всё это оставалось в голове на годы. И мне захотелось сделать в этом канале что-то по-настоящему атмосферное и творческое. Поэтому я запускаю конкурс коротких рассказов. 📜 Тема: Истории о чувствах и людях, которые оставили след. Это может быть: — …
❤2👾2
Выложил фанфик по киберпанк, пролог и первую главу на Автор Тудей, кому интересно, вот ссылочка👇 https://author.today/work/585313
❤1
Короче, отпуск прошел, значит, надо снова работать, я вот сейчас перепрошел киберпанк, вы не представляете, как мне нравится эта игра, и я хочу написать фанфик небольшой про продолжение истории Ви (женская версия), она Будет выглядеть как у меня в игре, каким оружием пользуется, как выполняет заказы (я проходи почти все по стелсу и без лишних крови ) и т. д. Уже написал пролог, если кто тоже проходил киберпанк, може…
❤3👍1👏1👾1🔥1😘1
Так же я сейчас тужусь над ещё одной книжкой «Тихий апокалипсис Алисии Вейн», уже почти 6 глав написано, и тут новые варики обложки, вот сиди и думай, какую выбрать, хотя чего тут думать, у меня на половину обложек скила не хватит, чтобы нарисовать. 🫠
❤5👏2✍1😘1
Хочу новую обложку на «Дети алой стены», так как суть книги поменялось с изначального варианта, балаюсь пока с нейросетями, но они такие тупые, не понимают, что я хочу. 😭 Я промнт написал на пару листов точно, как думаете, какой варик лучше? Можете свои идеи дать
❤3🤯2😱2😘1
Аоаоаоао, конечно, не по теме канала, но это одна из моих любимых игр, я так долго ждал русской озвучки, все теряем меня, я перепрохожу этот шедевр
✍4👏3💊1😘1
⚡️Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 получила профессиональную русскую озвучку. Разработкой занималась студия GamesVoice: среди популярных актеров — Евгения Лучникова (Резе из «Человека-бензопилы»), Александр Гаврилин (Роберт Паттинсон) и многие другие. Установить можно с официального сайта студии. 🕹КиберТопор — Подписаться
❤5🤯2💊1😱1
Как вам новая страница? Над книгой я сейчас уже на 15 главе, каждый день на ней работаю, так что всё окей 👌
✍6🔥3👍2💘1😘1
Рисуем обложку для будущей книги 📚
❤5🔥3👏2🤔1😘1😢1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @dark54321. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Scarlet Warrior” (@dark54321), 41 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dark54321.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.