Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Тёмная теология

Channel

Тёмная теология

@darktheology

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,098subscribers

+134 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001258114749
TypeChannel
Username@darktheology
DescriptionКанал Андрея Шишкова об экспериментальной теологии в объектно-ориентированной перспективе Другие каналы автора: https://t.me/radio_harman/ https://t.me/metaphysical_diary/ https://boosty.to/theologia Обратная связь: @and_shishkov
Created24 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/darktheology

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,9647,0987,0316 August 2026 — 6,964 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,964 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,972 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,981 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,972 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,981 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,989 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,990 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,010 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,014 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,004 subscribers26 September 2026 — 7,016 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,033 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,048 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,064 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,082 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,075 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,091 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,084 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,093 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,090 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,098 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
22 measurements spanning 91 days, net +134. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,944–7,118 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 11:517,098+8
2 Nov 2026, 13:017,090-3
30 Oct 2026, 13:567,093+9
27 Oct 2026, 03:597,084-7
24 Oct 2026, 02:277,091+16
20 Oct 2026, 22:597,075-7
17 Oct 2026, 20:347,082+18
14 Oct 2026, 23:467,064+16
11 Oct 2026, 13:187,048+15
5 Oct 2026, 06:377,033+17
26 Sept 2026, 22:207,016+12
17 Sept 2026, 13:577,004-10
13 Sept 2026, 04:367,014+4
9 Sept 2026, 14:007,010+20
4 Sept 2026, 05:186,990+1
31 Aug 2026, 18:046,989+8
28 Aug 2026, 13:266,981+9
16 Aug 2026, 20:376,972-9
13 Aug 2026, 03:346,981+9
10 Aug 2026, 07:426,972first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.6%
avg views ÷ 7,098 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,810
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held37 (17 June 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total21,772
Reactions total474
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 02:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
511
Videos
4
Links
593

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,237 reactions across 35 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤44135.7%
🔥29223.6%
👍14011.3%
😁756.06%
❤‍🔥584.69%
🍾584.69%
🥴221.78%
🤔181.46%
🗿171.37%
👏141.13%
🎉120.97%
🕊110.889%
👎100.808%
👨‍💻70.566%
🦄70.566%
🥰50.404%
🆒40.323%
🍌40.323%
🎃40.323%
🤣40.323%
18 further kinds342.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,399 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 37 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @darktheology. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 13:49 UTC892 views13 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

В моём канале на Boosty вышло продолжение разговора о “Внутреннем замке” св. Терезы Авильской. Если в предыдущем ролике мы исследовали первые три обители, то сегодня добрались до четвёртой и пятой (из семи). В них заканчивается аскетика и начинается созерцание. И если в четвёртой многие из нас бывали не раз, то в пятую некоторым людям вступить страшновато из-за иллюзорного страха потерять себя. https://boosty.to/th…

🔥7❤4😍2

31 Oct 2026, 15:06 UTC≈1,330 views22 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Итак, уже завтра стартует третий поток моего курса “Лествица духовного опыта”. На курсе три тарифа: - всё сам (просто лекции без обратной связи) - с поддержкой (лекции + две онлайн-встречи + чат по темам курса) - глубокая работа (всё перечисленное выше + индивидуальная консультация) Подробности по ссылке: https://so-smislom.ru/course/lestvitsa Регистрируйтесь, и до встречи на курсе!

❤12👨‍💻7🕊3

30 Oct 2026, 12:07 UTC≈1,950 views49 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Photo

У многих верующих однажды наступает момент, когда они перестают “чувствовать” Бога. Характерный для периода неофитства энтузиазм заканчивается и происходит охлаждение веры. Появляется сухость в молитве и практике, и кажется, что Бог тебя оставил по какой-то причине. Это состояние называется богооставленностью или тёмной ночью души. Первое желание – вернуть себе прежнюю интенсивность переживаний. И это одна из главны…

❤42👏5🔥1🤣1

28 Oct 2026, 13:45 UTC≈1,630 views63 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Лев Толстой в своей “Исповеди” описывает своё долгое религиозное обращение и даёт нам пример реалистического подхода к духовному опыту: Помню, это было раннею весной, я один был в лесу, прислушиваясь к звукам леса. Я прислушивался и думал всё об одном, как я постоянно думал всё об одном и том же эти последние три года. Я опять искал бога. «Хорошо, нет никакого бога, – говорил я себе, – нет такого, который бы был не…

❤40🔥9👍6🍌4💯2👌1🆒1

26 Oct 2026, 11:31 UTC≈1,770 views37 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Вышла запись нашего с поэтом Матвеем Соловьёвым обсуждения поэмы “Тёмная ночь души” св. Иоанна Креста. Получилось насыщенно. Поговорили и про трудности русского перевода, сравнив его с испанским оригиналом, и про кармелитскую созерцательную традицию, и про апофатическое богословие, и про многое другое. Видео доступно на Boosty Матвея в открытом доступе. https://boosty.to/scribendi/posts/cf49e184-b97a-4bc5-b702-b1c…

❤22👍7❤‍🔥4🤝3😇1

25 Oct 2026, 11:25 UTC≈1,900 views19 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Напоминаю, что ровно через неделю, 1 ноября, стартует третий поток моего курса “Лествица духовного опыта” на православной просветительской платформе “Жизнь со смыслом”. Вот, что пишут о нём слушатели предыдущих потоков. Записаться на курс можно здесь: https://so-smislom.ru/course/lestvitsa

❤11🔥6🦄2

22 Oct 2026, 14:01 UTC≈2,670 views29 reactionsread 7 November 2026

В ноябре на православной просветительской платформе “Жизнь со смыслом” запускается уже третий поток моего курса “Лествица духовного опыта”. Третий поток! Ого! Ничего себе! Но, если честно, меня совсем не удивляет востребованность этого курса, потому что каждый из нас хочет понимать, как двигаться по духовной жизни и принимать в ней самостоятельные решения. И всегда полезно знать, как выглядят основные этапы пути. Ос…

🔥16👍9✍1❤1👎1🤔1

20 Oct 2026, 11:53 UTC≈2,110 views42 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Культурный код: что предприниматели не замечают в собственном бизнесе На этой неделе, 21–22 октября (начиная с 16:00 до 19:30), будет проходить онлайн-форум “Капитал доверия”. На нём выступят 11 экспертов в различных областях, объединённых темой культурного кода нашей страны. От финансовой архитектуры и наследного права до стратегических коммуникаций, дизайна и теологии. Я буду говорить о том, из чего складывается …

🔥16😁9❤6👍5🤪3🦄2👎1

20 Oct 2026, 11:06 UTC≈1,610 views34 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @metaphysical_diaryPhoto

Из разговора с коллегой: Если сильные теологи орудуют молотом, то слабые теологи пускают в ход заточку. Десяток ироничных точечных уколов и соперник истекает кровью, не успев заметить нападения. Тёмные же теологи используют приёмы айкидо, выводя противников из равновесия и используя энергию их тела для броска.

🗿17😁8🔥5🌚1👎1🤔1🥰1

19 Oct 2026, 20:13 UTC≈2,030 views36 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

На прошлой неделе выступал с методологическим докладом на IX Конгрессе Русского религиоведческого общества в секции про материальную религию. Спасибо Софии Беженуце за приглашение организацию интересной секции. Мой доклад назывался “Имматериальная религия”, и в нём я попытался показать, какие инструменты может дать объектно-ориентированная онтология исследователю религии. Получилось так, что наши доклады с Павлом Но…

👍21🔥7🕊6👎2

17 Oct 2026, 19:08 UTC≈1,700 views92 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @metaphysical_diaryPhoto

Не Терезой и Иоанном Креста едиными знаменит орден кармелитов. В тёмную ночь души хорошо добавить немного светлого. P. S. Будет чем запить осадок от обсуждения манифеста “Теоэстетики”.

😁46🍾20👍12❤8💔3🤔2🤗1

15 Oct 2026, 09:29 UTC≈2,180 views38 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Дорогие друзья и уважаемые подписчики! В ближайшую субботу 17 октября состоится обсуждение Манифеста теоэстетики. Участвуют Алексей Гагинский - автор Манифеста, его оппоненты Евгений Карчагин, о. Вячеслав Рубский и Андрей Шишков; Я буду модерировать дискуссию. Все присутствующие смогут задать вопросы Алексею и высказать свои суждения о Манифесте и его ключевых идеях. Дискуссия будет проходить онлайн, на платформе Zoo…

🔥32❤6

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @darktheology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Православие и зомби
@orthozombies · 31,001
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 6 September 2026
Книжные Подборки
@knizhnye_podborki · 22,658
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 September 2026
Кураев
@akuraev · 26,796
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 September 2026
PhilosophyToday
@Philosophytoday · 19,756
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тёмная теология” (@darktheology), 7,098 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/darktheology.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.