Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
56 measurements spanning 92 days, net +108. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,139–13,379 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 00:59
13,341
+3
4 Nov 2026, 22:06
13,338
-3
3 Nov 2026, 19:00
13,341
-10
2 Nov 2026, 15:15
13,351
+4
1 Nov 2026, 14:37
13,347
+1
31 Oct 2026, 15:31
13,346
-4
30 Oct 2026, 15:00
13,350
+8
28 Oct 2026, 21:27
13,342
+1
27 Oct 2026, 18:38
13,341
+4
26 Oct 2026, 20:54
13,337
+4
25 Oct 2026, 21:26
13,333
+5
24 Oct 2026, 20:17
13,328
+5
23 Oct 2026, 23:08
13,323
+14
22 Oct 2026, 23:54
13,309
-6
21 Oct 2026, 20:19
13,315
-2
20 Oct 2026, 12:16
13,317
+2
18 Oct 2026, 11:27
13,315
+7
17 Oct 2026, 11:16
13,308
-1
15 Oct 2026, 12:16
13,309
+7
14 Oct 2026, 14:37
13,302
first reading
Engagement
105 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 13,341 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,120
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 105 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
105 (26 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
61,402
Reactions total
1,141
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 06:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈739
Videos
≈758
Links
≈5,710
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
12m 08s
Average length
1m 01s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,104 reactions across 103 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,833
44.7%
👍
1,560
38.0%
👏
304
7.41%
👌
178
4.34%
😢
111
2.70%
👎
38
0.926%
🙏
18
0.439%
🤬
15
0.365%
🤣
11
0.268%
🔥
9
0.219%
🤔
9
0.219%
🫡
4
0.097%
😴
3
0.073%
🥰
3
0.073%
🥴
3
0.073%
🤝
2
0.049%
😍
1
0.024%
😱
1
0.024%
🥱
1
0.024%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 105 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,189 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (6.90%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#کودکانگی
پاییز، بهارانه کودکی؛
پاییز رنگین کمانی از ذوق وشوق و عاشقانه هایی که بال در می آورند برای به آغوش کشیدن دلهای سخت و ... سمفونی از خش خش برگها و نسیم پاییزی همراه با نوای آب جویبار، که به رقص در می آورد کودک درون را ؛
نقش بستن روح دوستی ، به غلیان در آمدن شادی های کودکانه و غلتیدن در میان برگهای فرش شده بر بستر زمین با دنیایی از حس و حال مهرورزی ،یادگارهای بزرگیست برای آینده فرزندانی که می خواهند زندگی کن…
♻️بخشی از کتاب پشت پرده ریاکاری اثر دن اریلی روانشناس و متخصص اقتصاد رفتاری
نویسنده در کتاب «پشت پرده ریاکاری!» آزمایش های جالبی انجام داده است؛
او در یک رستوران به عدهای از مشتریان چند سؤال میدهد تا آنها در ازای گرفتن 5 دلار به این سؤالات پاسخ دهند، اما هنگام دادن پول به جای 5 دلار 9 دلار میدهد و به گونهای تظاهر میکند که حواسش نیست و اشتباهاً 9 دلار داده است.
برخی از مشتریان صادقانه 4 دلار اضافه را برمیگردان…
چهار دلیل شکست جمهوریخواهان از زبان ونس
♻️جی دی ونس، معاون رئیسجمهور آمریکا:
"دیروز، یکی از برجستهترین نظرسنجیگران عرصه سیاست به من گفت که طبق نظرسنجیها، با اختلاف ۱۳ واحد درصد از دموکراتها عقب هستیم. اگرچه پیش از سهشنبه هم انتظار نتیجه خوبی نداشتم، اما این اختلاف حتی مرا هم شوکه کرد.
او در نظرسنجیهایش دریافت که بسیاری از رأیدهندگان ترامپ در سال ۲۰۲۴ ناراضیاند و قصد دارند به دموکراتها رأی بدهند. وقتی از …
♻️ مخالفان تسخیر سفارت آمریکا چه کسانی بودند ؟!
@darvishane49
«از مشهورترین مخالفان حمله به سفارت میتوان از مهدوی کنی، مهدی بازرگان، ابراهیم یزدی و محمود احمدینژاد نام برد. البته هر یک از این افراد در آن زمان سمتهای متفاوتی داشتند و زاویه دید آنها به مساله یکسان نبود. علی مطهری اظهار میکند که اگر پدرش به شهادت نرسیده بود، جزو مخالفان حمله به سفارت قرار داشت.»
مهدی بازرگان: اجماع جهانی علیه ایران میشود
رییس دول…
♻️ اروپا و زیرساخت تغییر سیاسی در ایران
🗒 درحالیکه احتمال حمله مجدد آمریکا و اسرائیل برای سومین بار افزایش مییابد، تهدیدهای تهران مبنی بر گسترش دامنه پاسخ نظامی به کشورهای اروپایی نیز بارها تکرار شده است؛ اما آیا این تهدیدها میتوانند در محاسبات «ترامپ» اثر بازدارنده داشته باشند؟ بعید به نظر میرسد که این تهدید، اراده ترامپ برای حمله به جمهوری اسلامی را متوقف کند؛ بلکه ترامپ ممکن است از همین تهدیدها برای اثبات…
امروز 3 November، روز جهانی خانومهایی هست که خانهداری میکنند.
گرامی می دارم بانوان را از مادرم تا همسرم از خواهرم تا خواهر همسرم از زن داداشم تا بانوان همراه و هموطن را که بار اصلی پرورش و پشتیبانی خانواده بر دوش آنهاست.
درود بر خانم هایی که نیمی از زندگی شان را به پای خانه و خانواده می ریزند و نیمی دیگر را چون چتر تا آخرین لحظات عمر افراشته می دارند به حمایت؛
گرامی می داریم نام و یاد همه بانوان ایران زمین از کر…
♻️تهدید حقوق ملت به نام مقابله با نفوذ
مقابله با نفوذ و صیانت از امنیت ملی، ضرورتی غیرقابل انکار است؛ اما مسئله اینجاست که با چه تعریفی از نفوذ، با چه ابزارهایی و به چه قیمتی قرار است از امنیت کشور دفاع کنیم؟ پرسش این است:
آیا هر ارتباط با جهان خارج، هر نقد سیاسی، هر فعالیت مدنی و هر صدای متفاوتی را میتوان با برچسب نفوذ در معرض سوءظن و محدودیت قرار داد و این رویکرد تا کنون تا چه حد توانسته است نظام را در برابر نفو…
♻️به مناسبت ۱۳ ابان تسخیر سفارت آمریکا؛
در کشور ما دو بار به سفارت آمریکا حمله شد. اولین حمله در تاریخ 25 بهمن سال 1357 یعنی چند روزی بعد از پیروزی انقلاب بهوقوع پیوست.
آیتالله خمینی با مشاوران خود در پاریس و خصوصا دکتر ابراهیم یزدی به این نتیجه رسیده بودند که در پروسه انقلاب و بعد از آن باید از هر تنشی با امریکا اجتناب نموده تا کشور در مقابل چالش نظامی داخلی، هرجومرج و جنگ قرار نگیرد. دکتر یزدی یکی از کسانیست…
♻️سخنرانی فراموش نشدنی #ویکتور_هوگو در مجلس فرانسه
متن سخنرانی مذکور ترجمه استاد شجاع الدین شفا می باشد:
برای پی ریزی جامعه ای بکوشیم که در آن جای کشیش در کلیسای خودش باشد
و جای دولت در مراکز کار خودش!
نه حکومت در موعظه مذهبی کشیشان دخالت کند و نه مذهب به بودجه و سیاست دولت کاری داشته باشد.
برای پی ریزی جامعه ای بکوشیم که در آن همچنانکه قرن گذشته ما قرن اعلام تساوی حقوق مردان بود. قرن حاضر ما قرن اعلام برابری کامل…
وقتی یکی از دانشجویان از "مارگارت مید" پرسید نخستین نشانهی تمدن در یک فرهنگ چیست؟ دانشجو انتظار داشت تا "مید" دربارهی سفال یا سنگ آسیاب حرف بزند، ولی "مید" گفت نخستین نشانهی تمدن در یک فرهنگِ باستانی استخوان رانی بوده که شکسته شده و دوباره جوش خورده. "مید" توضیح داد که چنانچه پای شما در یک قلمروی حیوانی بشکند، شما میمیرید. نمیتوانید از خطر فرار کنید، برای نوشیدن به رودخانه بزنید یا برای غذا شکار کنید. شما خوراکی…
♻️تا_انتها_بخوانید
در منزل دوستی که پسرش دانشآموز ابتدایی و داشت تکالیف درسی اش را انجام میداد بودم
زنگ منزل را زدند و پدر بزرگ خانواده از راه رسید.
پدربزرگ با لبخند، یک جعبه مداد رنگی به نوه اش داد و گفت: این هم جایزۀ نمرۀ بیست نقاشیات.
پسر ده ساله، جعبۀ مداد رنگی را گرفت و تشکر کرد
و چند لحظه بعد گفت:
بابا بزرگ
باز هم که از این جنسهای ارزون قیمت خریدی
الان مداد رنگیهای خارجی هست که ده برابر این کیفیت داره.
…
❤48👏10👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @darvishane49. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@darvishane49 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
31 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@darvishane49 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@darvishsne49 named in 3 posts, 21 August 2026 – 26 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ژیوا @ZhiwaChannel · 19,086 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 3 October 2026
جمع مدیران نامدار ایران @excellentmanagers · 27,237 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 September 2026
گلچين @bavarh · 78,289 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
شبکه خبری بازنشستگان @bazneshasteganirani · 84,901 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قلم بیداری” (@darvishane49), 13,341 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/darvishane49.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.