Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net +68. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,680–3,768 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 19:02
3,758
+6
13 Sept 2026, 07:38
3,752
+2
9 Sept 2026, 04:42
3,750
+2
4 Sept 2026, 05:39
3,748
+9
31 Aug 2026, 11:35
3,739
+11
28 Aug 2026, 05:03
3,728
+17
25 Aug 2026, 02:07
3,711
+3
21 Aug 2026, 15:57
3,708
+13
18 Aug 2026, 12:06
3,695
+2
15 Aug 2026, 19:27
3,693
+2
12 Aug 2026, 13:54
3,691
-2
9 Aug 2026, 03:52
3,693
+3
8 Aug 2026, 05:15
3,690
no change
8 Aug 2026, 05:05
3,690
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
810 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5237899156491639396
407
50.2%
custom 5435871598076794992
191
23.6%
custom 5273839537313836566
76
9.38%
custom 5402496888983281361
62
7.65%
custom 5235655783403787169
50
6.17%
custom 5402122531043826286
22
2.72%
custom 5332305484005265573
2
0.247%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 810 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Просто #кадры_дня вчерашнего ❤️
Виды здесь конечно дух захватывающие! А небо меняется каждую минуту!
Нам повезло застать и солнечную погоду с настроением советского ялтинского курорта и дождливый день с вайбом норвежских фьордов🙌🏻
Отметили с Егором первую годовщину свадьбы, кстати❤️
А еще я насобирала на склоне холма много листьев дикого ириса для заготовок. Буду плести корзины😊
Ребят, кому понравился мой выпуск с Егором, где он отгадывает разные вязальные штуки?
Недавно еще вышел такой же классный и смешной выпуск у Наташи (канал Муха), где ее муж и друг отгадывают цены на пряжу и вязальные инструменты👍🏻💛🧺
Очень советую к просмотру -
https://youtu.be/bm7rR4dz730?si=UY9uPct3kCis7ppY
И вообще Наташа мне оч импонирует, такая яркая, юморная и «своя», близкая по духу😽💛
Итак, подключение из Хакасии🌿
Ехали мы на машине аж 12 часов😳 это при том, что Егор нормально так гнал🚗 Но оно абсолютно того стоит! Уже сама дорога была такой красивой! Я не переставала улыбаться и задыхаться от восторга🤩
Ехали по приглашению подруги на базу отдыха ее родителей, которая находится на озере Белё. И оказалось это целый комплекс, как маленький городок с вайбом летнего курорта🙌🏻🏡
Впервые услышала о ба…
Мы с Егором абсолютно внезапно и спонтанно уехали в путешествие в Хакасию!⛰️
Но я молодец и заранее подготовила для вас вторничный влог🤚
〰️на YouTube
〰️на ВК
Так что всем приятного просмотра☕️
Ребят, совершенно внезапный видео-бонус от нас с Егором! 😎 Он будет отгадывать разные вязальные штуки😄 (а я специально самые сложные выбрала😁) Так что там смешно👍🏻
〰️на YouTube
〰️на ВК
Приятного просмотра! 🐱🤎
#кадры_дня 🌼
Впервые за два года добралась обновить стрижку. Ну и я теперь в банде чёлок, здравствуйте😎💛
А еще купила изумительный горшочек в виде чеснока 🧄 вообще это гошочек для запекания, но я теперь в нем ем любимый творог с фруктами и ягодами🫶🍓🤩 и это просто детский восторг!
А как ваши дела? Делитесь своими кадрами дня 🥰💛
✨✨✨ 🌸 ✨✨✨
youtube / vk / instagram
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @darya_zagoruyk0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Declared links
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ДАША ЗАГОРУЙКО” (@darya_zagoruyk0), 3,758 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/darya_zagoruyk0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
