Video, posted without a caption
custom 538857416837773397847

Channel
@daryapirh
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
10,918subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001764248633 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @daryapirh |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/daryapirh |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 10,918 | -3 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 10,921 | -2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 10,923 | -13 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 10,936 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 10,937 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:14 | 10,940 | -7 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 10,947 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 10,952 | -29 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 10,981 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:44 | 10,987 | -15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 11,002 | -60 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 11,062 | +141 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 10,921 | first reading |
49 posts held, back to 26 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 49 (26 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 210,170 |
| Reactions total | 13,000 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 02:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13,000 reactions across 49 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5388574168377733978 | 13,000 | 100.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,000 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
custom 538857416837773397847
Итак, рассказываю, как у меня появилась первая подруга в университете. Нас согнали на парад студентов по Перми — это когда все первокурсники со всех университетов идут по городу. Я была не очень умная и не догадалась, что можно просто не пойти, я думала, что наругают ((( В общем, пока шли начался ливень, адский. У меня не было ни зонта, ни капюшона, я поняла, что промокну насквозь и заболею. Девочка рядом была рост…
custom 5388574168377733978300
Помогите (у меня нет опыта)
custom 5388574168377733978131
Высшее образование есть
custom 5388574168377733978224
СМОТРЕТЬ ВСЕМ ❕
custom 5388574168377733978144
Садитесь, сейчас будет новая видеолекция. К просмотру обязательно. Всех, кто не посмотрит, буду кикать с канала. Каждая посмотревшая будет обязана описать в комментариях эмоции после просмотра.
custom 5388574168377733978151
Даже главные фанаты от ЛМ отвернулись 😳 М-да 🤔🤔🤔
custom 5388574168377733978223
В обществе просто принято хаять всё популярное. Даже у Анны Асти есть парочка хейтеров.
custom 5388574168377733978122
Лекция для вас 😉 последнее слово проглотилось((( недовольны*
custom 5388574168377733978123
Мне всё таки немного потешно читать хейт ЛМ Я, как вы знаете, большой хейтер астрологии. По этой же причине я ненавижу "Натальную карту", "Битву экстрасенсов" и все вытекающие отсюда программы. На мой взгляд они куда более вредительны для общества, чем "Мама в 16". Во всяком случае несмотря на популярность "Мамы в 16" и, якобы, нацеленности последних выпусков повысить рождаемость (это отмечает большинство недовольн…
custom 5388574168377733978248
У ЛМ вышла новая история в коллаборации с телеканалом Ю Вижу много комментариев по типу "всё настолько плохо?" и т.д. Так наоборот же получается, что всё очень хорошо, раз такие бренды приходят за рекламой 🥳 Мб заодно будут $$$ на техничку, к которой у многих вопросы.
custom 5388574168377733978350
Выше речь про клип Кая Метова 1994 года с гениальными строчками: Position number one — говоришь «не дам» Position number two, мол, только ему Да, это верно, но подумай сама Сегодня вторник, значит, он — это я И я тебе звоню, position number two В своё время мы с подругой, когда собирались вместе в деревне Лобаново, постоянно включали данный шедевр. Но примечателен он для меня вообще другим. В клипе девушки в одних …
custom 5388574168377733978305
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @daryapirh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Хотели бы вы работать в сфере визуальных новелл
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как вы думаете, состоится ли по итогу концерт Канье Веста?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Хотели бы вы чтобы в вашей стране законодательно запретили любое курение и продажу относящейся к ней продукции
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Даша Пырх | Психология отношений” (@daryapirh), 10,918 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daryapirh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.