Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Даша | Мать чат-ботеров

Channel

Даша | Мать чат-ботеров

@dashabots

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

14,432subscribers

-842 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001567196537
TypeChannel
Username@dashabots
DescriptionЗабрать закрытый разбор — как выйти на стабильные 50.000, напиши в лс «Разбор» @LadiDariy #YCVGB https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6735f16197de7d1d19539891&registryType=bloggersPermission
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/dashabots

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,43215,27414,8537 August 20267 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 92 days, net -842. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,306–15,400 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 03:1614,432-10
6 Nov 2026, 03:1914,442-9
5 Nov 2026, 01:4914,451-3
4 Nov 2026, 01:3714,454-20
3 Nov 2026, 00:3914,474-6
2 Nov 2026, 00:5614,480-8
1 Nov 2026, 03:5114,488-2
31 Oct 2026, 03:0114,490-6
30 Oct 2026, 00:0414,496-6
28 Oct 2026, 21:1114,502-8
27 Oct 2026, 17:1814,510-6
26 Oct 2026, 19:1914,516-8
25 Oct 2026, 20:3414,524-10
24 Oct 2026, 17:3614,534-5
23 Oct 2026, 21:0614,539-10
22 Oct 2026, 22:1014,549-7
21 Oct 2026, 22:0614,556-10
20 Oct 2026, 15:3714,566-4
19 Oct 2026, 16:3414,570-8
18 Oct 2026, 20:0714,578first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.82%
avg views ÷ 14,432 subscribers
Avg views / post
406
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 October 2026
Posts held23 (15 July 2026 – 19 October 2026)
Views total4,064
Reactions total84
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 18:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,180
Videos
≈330
Links
≈150

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 46s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

272 reactions across 21 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥11040.4%
❤4918.0%
👍4918.0%
😍269.56%
custom 5836898273666798437124.41%
🤷‍♂72.57%
🦄62.21%
❤‍🔥31.10%
🍓20.735%
💋20.735%
⚡10.368%
👏10.368%
💯10.368%
🙉10.368%
🤝10.368%
🤷‍♀10.368%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 272 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 19 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

19 Oct 2026, 12:23 UTC431 views13 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Пока одни боятся нейросетей, другие уже делают на них проекты и берут первые деньги😱 Я просто визжу от восторга, что вытворяют девочки на интенсиве🥹🥹 буквально за несколько дней на интенсиве они сделали: 🔹 ботов 🔹 сайты 🔹 свои веб-приложения И это при том, что еще недавно часть из них вообще не умели пользоваться нейросетями... Одна из учениц пошла дальше и настроила ИИ себе так, что он: – сам ищет ей клиентов – …

❤4❤‍🔥3custom 58368982736667984372⚡1🍓1💋1🤷‍♀1

14 Oct 2026, 14:01 UTC500 views9 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

МЫ НАЧИНАЕМ❗️ Ну чтоооо Сегодня стартовал интенсив «Нейросети с нуля», и участникам уже открылся первые уроки! И сейчас у вас есть последняя возможность присоединиться к нам и пройти этот путь вместе со мной ❤️ Напомню, что вы получаете за 2.490р👇🏻 Урок 1. Настраиваем нейросети и разбираемся с доступом и оплатой из России (на скрине ученица говорит, на легко ей удалось по моему уроку) Урок 2. Осваиваемся в нейро…

🔥3👍2😍2❤1👏1

14 Oct 2026, 10:50 UTC438 views9 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

ЯНДЕКС RIP ❌ Что делать? Видели, что творится после сбоев в дата-центрах Яндекса? 🥲 У многих бизнесов отвалились боты, не проходят оплаты, не работают привычные инструменты И я снова убеждаюсь: важно создавать своё, а не зависеть от одной платформы!! Как вовремя я успела перенести Мои боты, которые я сделала с помощью нейросетей, спокойно работают. Они не привязаны ни к какому конструктору Также сегодня открылис…

🔥5😍2👍1custom 58368982736667984371

14 Oct 2026, 10:50 UTC351 views6 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥2❤1🍓1💋1😍1

13 Oct 2026, 09:07 UTC357 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Кто уже с нами? У нас уже 12 человек в чате, и я в восторге от того, кто к нам приходит 🥹❤️ — Есть те, кто уже работает с чат-ботами и хочет освоить нейросети, чтобы расширить свои услуги и увеличить доход — Есть мамочки в декрете, которые ищут возможность зарабатывать удалённо — И есть те, кто хочет освоить новое направление и получать дополнительный доход на фрилансе, параллельно с основной работой И мне очень…

🔥3❤1👍1🦄1custom 58368982736667984371

12 Oct 2026, 10:44 UTC373 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Конкуренция в нейросетях уже огромная? С чего тогда вообще начинать? 👀 Я всё чаще слышу от вас, что страшно заходить в нейросети, потому что кажется, будто там уже все всё умеют и новичкам просто некуда податься Но давайте посмотрим на конкуренцию под другим углом)) Нейросети — это не одно направление! Это: — AI-фотографы, — генерация видео и мультфильмов — создание ИИ-музыки — дизайн — работа с ботами — ИИ-помощ…

🔥3❤2👍1custom 58368982736667984371

12 Oct 2026, 09:00 UTC370 views13 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

😱 Срочно нужно 20 специалистов по чат-ботам Такое сообщение мне недавно написал мой знакомы. Он будет проводить мероприятие и нужно больше 20 спецов Конечно, я буду давать своих учеников)) Так что учиться или быть в Клубе у меня очень выгодно! 90% своих заявок я передаю вам 😅❤️

❤6👍3🔥3custom 58368982736667984371

11 Oct 2026, 08:39 UTC429 views10 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Voice message

🎙️ "Мы были в шаге от развода. И вот что помогло нам выбраться " Ребят, записала для вас финальную часть истории про наш кризис с Денисом, который чуть не привёл нас к разводу… Впервые так открыто и подробно рассказала всю историю с самого начала ❤️‍🩹 И как бы странно это ни звучало, именно нейросети помогли нам выбраться из кризиса. Как именно - рассказала в подкасте А ещё поделилась главным выводом, который сде…

❤6👍2🔥2

9 Oct 2026, 07:47 UTC436 views10 reactionsread 7 November 2026

«Сейчас уже все умеют пользоваться нейросетями. Кто вообще будет за это платить?» Ребят, честно, это просто искажение восприятия )) Вы подписаны на меня, смотрите контент про ИИ, общаетесь с людьми, которые пользуются нейросети. Поэтому кажется, что это умеют уже вообще все… Но! Спросить у нейронки рецепт ужина и настроить ИИ, который будет выполнять задачи бизнеса, – это две совершенно разные вещи! Уметь состав…

🔥5👍2😍2custom 58368982736667984371

9 Oct 2026, 07:13 UTC379 viewsread 7 November 2026
Poll

Ребят, кому кажется, что все вокруг уже разбираются в ИИ и сами могут себе всё сделать?

  1. Да, сейчас куча бесплатной инфы38%
  2. 50 на 50. Думаю базово пользуются уже все41%
  3. Вообще так не думаю. Большинство не умеет пользоваться22%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC380 views22 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

30К ЗА БОТА, СДЕЛАННОГО ЧЕРЕЗ НЕЙРОСЕТЬ. Ученик закрыл первого клиента😱 Артур пришёл в личную работу ко мне уже умея делать простые боты. Но деньги на этом не зарабатывал Нашёл клиентку через закрытый клуб -девушка устраивает туры в Якутию. Запрос: чат-бот с реферальной системой. Но Артур пошёл дальше Предложил сделать в формате веб-приложения с личным кабинетом для клиентки. И сделал демо-версию бота прямо под е…

❤8🔥7😍4👍2🙉1

22 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC502 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ПЕРВАЯ НЕДЕЛЯ В КИТАЕ, И Я ВСЁ ЕЩЁ В ШОКЕ 😱🥹 За одну неделю мы объездили столько всего, что я до сих пор перевариваю....дни такие насыщенные, что я не успеваю выкладывать фото и видео Где побывали 👇🏻 Шанхай — город из будущего. Масштабные высотки на набережной, музей Луи Витон, роботы в отеле которые развозят заказы по номерам. И ресторан где еда приезжает к тебе на специальных машинках Гора Линьшань — поднималис…

🔥12❤3👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @dashabots. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Oct 2026, 07:13 UTCAnonymous Poll32 voters

Ребят, кому кажется, что все вокруг уже разбираются в ИИ и сами могут себе всё сделать?

  1. Да, сейчас куча бесплатной инфы38%
  2. 50 на 50. Думаю базово пользуются уже все41%
  3. Вообще так не думаю. Большинство не умеет пользоваться22%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 19 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Даша | Мать чат-ботеров” (@dashabots), 14,432 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dashabots.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.