Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 91 days, net -178. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,325–8,557 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 03:16
8,352
-1
2 Nov 2026, 17:06
8,353
-3
30 Oct 2026, 15:36
8,356
-18
27 Oct 2026, 14:36
8,374
-4
24 Oct 2026, 10:45
8,378
-7
21 Oct 2026, 06:21
8,385
-7
18 Oct 2026, 02:00
8,392
-6
14 Oct 2026, 21:19
8,398
+9
11 Oct 2026, 14:01
8,389
-1
5 Oct 2026, 14:39
8,390
+11
27 Sept 2026, 17:19
8,379
-22
18 Sept 2026, 01:00
8,401
-16
13 Sept 2026, 12:37
8,417
-8
9 Sept 2026, 20:36
8,425
-25
4 Sept 2026, 09:20
8,450
-10
31 Aug 2026, 23:34
8,460
-1
29 Aug 2026, 07:08
8,461
-4
26 Aug 2026, 17:18
8,465
-6
23 Aug 2026, 16:09
8,471
-6
19 Aug 2026, 18:23
8,477
first reading
Engagement
58 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.71%
avg views ÷ 8,352 subscribers
Avg views / post
393
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 58 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
58 (23 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
2,753
Reactions total
29
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 11:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
488
Videos
283
Links
155
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
16m 45s
Average length
1m 41s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
83 reactions across 31 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
64
77.1%
🔥
9
10.8%
👍
6
7.23%
👏
1
1.20%
🙏
1
1.20%
🥰
1
1.20%
🥴
1
1.20%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Даёшь игру, а он убегает?
Ребёнок не делает то, что ты просишь?
Может потому что ему это просто не подходит по возрасту.
Как много я вижу запуганных мам, которые думают: «Я что-то делаю не так». А игра или задание просто не на его уровне.
Я собрала методичку
«Раннее развитие» для малышей от 10 месяцев до 2 лет:
✔ чему учить на каждом этапе ✔ как удержать внимание, если убегает ✔ как общаться, чтобы он больше го…
Если вашему ребёнку 1 год, а он ещё не говорит такие слова как СОБАКА ИЛИ КОРОВА не паникуйте.
Не нужно сейчас упорно “запускать речь” и мучить его повторением слов.
Это часто даёт обратный эффект: ребёнок либо замыкается, либо начинает говорить ещё более обрывисто, потому что речевая система ещё не готова к такой нагрузке.
Сейчас ваша задача другая, укрепить то, что идёт перед речью: правильный уровень игры, те де…
Малыш говорит только первым слогом? Давайте разбираться
Ребёнку на видео 1 год и 9 месяцев. НО вместо НО-ГИ
Почему так происходит? В этом возрасте малышу сложно удержать слово целиком и переключиться с одного слога на другой. Первый слог получается, а на второй пока не хватает сил.
❌ Что мы делаем не так: просим «скажи нормально» и заставляем повторять слово целиком.
✅Что помогает: разделить слово на части и дать…
Часто мы требуем от ребёнка больше, чем он пока может нам дать. ❤️
Чтобы помогать малышу развивать речь, важно понимать, какие звуки появляются в определённом возрасте, какие замены считаются естественными и чего пока не стоит требовать от ребёнка.
Я подготовила для вас пост-шпаргалку, в которой собрала информацию о появлении звуков по возрастам и типичных звуковых заменах. Обязательно сохраняйте, чтобы не потерять…
Уже в понедельник стартует марафон по запуску речи 🍁
Если вы не знаете, чем и как занять ребёнка, он постоянно убегает, а игрушки пылятся на полках, пора менять подход к игре.
💡 На марафоне разберём, как через простые и понятные игры стимулировать речь малыша в повседневной жизни.
🍂 Хотите помочь ребёнку заговорить? Еще есть возможность присоединиться по ссылке → https://app.lava.top/products/c1eeee69-a122-46b8-9d…
Ваш ребенок 1,5-3 лет пока молчит или говорит мало? Не ждите, что «само заговорит» 🤍
🗓️12 октября стартует мой марафон по запуску речи.
📎10 дней практических игр простым языком, и главное: я лично смотрю ваши видео и говорю, что делать именно вам.
Первые результаты видны уже через неделю.
Хотите в марафон? Вступайте в закрытый чат по ссылке ССЫЛКА💥
Тревожная мама ≠ плохая мама.
Проблема современного родительства часто не в том, что мама не знает, как правильно.
А в том, что она устала, перегружена и живёт на пределе.
Отсюда….тревога, раздражение, чувство хаоса и сложности во взаимодействии с ребёнком.
Поэтому я готовлю для вас вебинар, где разберём:
- как снизить собственную тревогу;
- как не передавать её ребёнку;
- как выстраивать общение и игру без ощущен…
Ты не «слишком остро реагируешь», когда весь вечер прокручиваешь в голове одну свою ошибку.
Просто твой мозг не умеет останавливаться на «ничего страшного, в следующий раз лучше».
Почему так происходит
1. Тревога ищет контроль. Если я найду, в чём именно я виновата, значит, я смогу это предотвратить в следующий раз. Самокопание кажется мозгу «работой над ошибками», хотя на деле только истощает.
2. Внутренний крит…
Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @dashatrener. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 12 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
7. Вы переживаете, что делаете недостаточно для своего ребёнка или семьи?
Да78%
Нет22%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Позитивное воспитание. Вика Минасян @positivepsychology1 · 54,821 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
Kateandbogdan_new @Kateandbogdan_new · 81,259 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Playmamka @playmamka · 52,463 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💥ИГРАЕМ С ДАШЕЙ👧👦” (@dashatrener), 8,352 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dashatrener.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.