Channel
@dastan_kootah
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
34,539subscribers
-580 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001008678815 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dastan_kootah |
| Description | سعی میکنیم روزانه داستان های کوتاه و آموزنده حکایات و بریده هایی از کتاب ها و سخنان ناب و ارزشمند را برای شما عزیزان ارسال کنیم . |
| Created | 19 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dastan_kootah |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 13:46 | 34,539 | -6 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:31 | 34,545 | +6 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:10 | 34,539 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:19 | 34,542 | -8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:40 | 34,550 | -2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:11 | 34,552 | -1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:05 | 34,553 | -9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:18 | 34,562 | -10 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:57 | 34,572 | -7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:01 | 34,579 | -4 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 05:41 | 34,583 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 34,589 | -2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:17 | 34,591 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 07:54 | 34,596 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 34,600 | -12 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 08:16 | 34,612 | -4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:21 | 34,616 | -10 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 23:19 | 34,626 | -3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:28 | 34,629 | -2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 02:27 | 34,631 | first reading |
51 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 175 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 51 (8 June 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 31,773 |
| Reactions total | 266 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 06:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
951 reactions across 51 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 658 | 69.2% | |
| 👍 | 182 | 19.1% | |
| 👎 | 71 | 7.47% | |
| 🔥 | 40 | 4.21% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 951 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (7.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💎اصالت مادامى که سيب با چوب باريکش به درخت متصل است همه عوامل در جهت رشدش در تلاشند. باد باعث طراوتش میشود آب باعث رشدش میشود و آفتاب پختگی و کمال ميبخشد اما ... به محض منقطع شدن از درخت و جدايى از "اصل" آب باعث گندیدگی باد باعث پلاسیدگی و آفتاب باعث پوسیدگی و از بين رفتن طراوتش میشود. مراقب وصل بودن به "اصالتمان" باشیم که انسانیتمان از بین نرود..! ─═हई 🍷 @dastan_kootah 🍷 ईह═─
❤13👍4👎1
💎روزی "اندوه" به روستای ما آمد "گفتیم رهگذر است اما ماند گفتیم مسافر است و خستگی در می کند و می رود باز هم ماند و نشست و شروع کرد به بلعیدن ذخیره امیدمان گفتیم:مهمان بد قدمیست دو سه روز دیگر می رود و باز هم ماند و ماند و ماند و تبدیل شد به یکی از اعضای ده مان اکنون اندوه کدخدا شده و تمام کوچه ها بوی "آه" می دهد . تمام امیدها را بلعید و به جایش "حسرت" در دلها انبار کرد پیران ده هنوز به یاد دارند : روزی که اندوه آ…
❤23👍20🔥3
💎مجلس میهمانی بود..... پیر مرد از جایش برخاست تا به بیرون برود... اما وقتی که بلند شد، عصای خویش را بر عکس بر زمین نهاد..... و چون دسته عصا بر زمین بود تعادل کامل نداشت... دیگران فکر کردند که او چون پیر شده، دیگر حواس خویش را از دست داده و متوجه نیست که عصایش را بر عکس بر زمین نهاده..... به همین خاطر صاحبخانه با حالتی که خالی از تمسخر نبود به وی گفت: پس چرا عصایت را بر عکس گرفته ای؟! پیر مرد آرام و متین پاسخ داد…
❤44👍8👎3
برنامه و ساعتهای آموزشی کلاسهای خصوصی داستان نویسی و آموزش شعر سپیدِ شاهین بهرامی. شنبهها: خانم مهدیه از کانادا ساعت ۸/۳۰ الی ۹/۳۰ صبح آقای ایمان از یاسوج ساعت ۲۱ الی ۲۲ یکشنبهها: خانم اکرم از تهران ساعت ۲۱ الی ۲۲ دوشنبهها: خانم شبنم از کرج ساعت ۲۱ الی ۲۲ سه شنبهها: خالی چهارشنبهها: خالی پنجشنبهها: خانم سیما از مشهد ساعت ۲۱ الی ۲۲ . خدای مهربان را بسیار شاکریم و خیلی خوشحالیم و افتخار میکنیم که: از ش…
❤6👍3
با شنیدن این حرفها و کنایه ها ،شاید اوایل خیلی ناراحت میشدم و خودم را سرزنش میکردم. چون به هادی علاقمند بودم. و زندگیم را دوست داشتم. اما بعدها سعی کردم به خودم و بچه هایم فکر کنم. به دعوت وکیل با پدرم به دفترش میرویم. پدرم میپرسد: «آیا فهمیدید چرا هادی در زندان است» وکیل مطالبی گفت که واقعا دور از ذهن من بود. شاید در خواب و رویا هم در مورد هادی فکر نمیکردم. چقدر انسان میتواند سقوط کند. من پدر هادی را به لحاظ اخلاق…
❤15👍12
وقتی با خودم خلوت میکنم . به خودم نهیب میزنم: « ایکاش سارا تو کارای هادی بیشتر کندوکاو میکردی. رفتارهای غیرعادیش را زیر نظر میگرفتی. سارا تو تقصیر کاری. زندگی ات، تو کار و بچه ها و آرامشی هر چند موقت خلاصه شده بود. ارتباطت را باید با خانواده هادی بیشتر میکردی . و از طعنه و کنایه خواهر و مادرش فرار نمیکردی. و این رفتارها را به حساب دشمنی نمیگذاشتی» چون هادی تقاضای طلاق داده قاعدتا مهریه باید بدون دردسر پرداخت میشد. ام…
❤13
و با بغض ادامه میدهم: «پدر اگر هادی مقصر نبوده چرا از صبح زود از خانه بیرون زده و حتی به خودش اجازه نداده راجع به شب قبل حتی کلامی با من صحبت کنه. از صبح هم گوشی اش در دسترس نیست» پدر سرش را با تاسف تکان میدهد و میگوید: « حرفت درسته . باید با تو صحبت میکرد.» من که به شدت از دست کارهای هادی عصبی هستم ، میگویم: «پدر جان الان باید هادی صحبت کنه و درباره حرفهای دیشب و تعهدی که به کلانتری داده، و مهمتر زنی که همراهش بوده…
❤18👍2
اشک پهنای صورتم را پرکرده بود. حرفهای رئیس کلانتری مثل نیشتری توی قلبم فرو میرفت ، وقتی رئیس گفته بود خواهرش هم همراه شوهرتون بوده. کدام خواهر! حالا علت عصبانیت های بجا و بی جای هادی را میفهمم. پس زنی هم در کار است. وای بر احوال زندگیم. حالا که خوب فکر میکنم ، یکسالی میشد که هادی هر از گاهی به بهانه کار در شرکت و انجام پروژه دیرتر به خانه می آمد. و هر بار سوال میکردم ،جواب های پرت و پلائی میداد.و اگر بیشتر ادامه م…
❤11👍4
سارا 💎 تلفنم زنگ میخورد. نگاهی به صفحه موبایل میکنم. شماره ناشناس است. ارتباط که برقرار میشود.، میگویم: «بفرمایید» صدای بم و مردانه ای میگوید: «خانم سارا صمدی؟» - بله خودم هستم - خانم همین الان به کلانتری شماره بیست و چهار بیایید آب دهانم را به سختی قورت میدهم. کمی کنترل دست و بدنم را از دست دادهام. بریده بریده می پرسم: «ببخشید جناب، برای چی به کلانتری بیام؟» میگوید: « خانم سوال نکن. به اندازه کافی متهم چونه زد…
❤14👍3
کلاس خصوصی داستاننویسی آنلاین «از ایده تا پایان بندی» «از تمام ایران عزیز و جهان، میتوانید در کلاس شرکت کنید.» «جلسه اول رایگان» خیلیها داستان در ذهن دارند، اما «نویسنده» کسی است که میداند چطور کلمات را کنار هم بچیند تا تاثیرگذار باشد. در دورههای خصوصی داستاننویسی، به صورت اختصاصی روی: • ایدهپردازی و شخصیتپردازی • ساختارِ داستان کوتاه • ویرایش و پرداختِ متن کار میکنیم. آموزش توسط: شاهین بهرامی جهت رز…
❤6👍5
حُکمِ خروج 💎 آن روز صبح، سکوتِ خانه به اندازهای سنگین بود که صدایِ تیکتاکِ ساعتِ دیواری، مثل ضربههای چکش روی اعصابم میکوبید. قهوه را برای دو نفر آماده کرده بودم، همانطور که هر روز صبح انجام میدادم. صندلیِ مقابلِ من خالی بود، اما میدانستم «سهیل» به زودی از راه میرسد. همیشه میگفت: «ترافیکِ پنجشنبهها، لعنتیست.» ساعت ده شد. عقربهی ثانیهشمار با صدایی خشک جلو میرفت: «تیک، تاک، تیک، تاک...» ناگهان موبایلم رو…
❤16🔥2
کلاس خصوصی داستاننویسی آنلاین «از ایده تا پایان بندی» «از تمام ایران عزیز و جهان، میتوانید در کلاس شرکت کنید.» «جلسه اول رایگان» خیلیها داستان در ذهن دارند، اما «نویسنده» کسی است که میداند چطور کلمات را کنار هم بچیند تا تاثیرگذار باشد. در دورههای خصوصی داستاننویسی، به صورت اختصاصی روی: • ایدهپردازی و شخصیتپردازی • ساختارِ داستان کوتاه • ویرایش و پرداختِ متن کار میکنیم. آموزش توسط: شاهین بهرامی جهت رز…
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @dastan_kootah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@dastan_kootah edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 5 posts on @dastan_kootah as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“داستان کوتاه” (@dastan_kootah), 34,539 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dastan_kootah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.