Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Data New Gold

Channel

Data New Gold

@data_new_gold

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,481subscribers

+81 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001437741565
TypeChannel
Username@data_new_gold
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/data_new_gold

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,4003,4813,440.56 August 2026 — 3,400 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,401 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,400 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,449 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,451 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,455 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,463 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,471 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,469 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,467 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,457 subscribers12 September 2026 — 3,449 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,481 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net +81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,388–3,493 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 20:203,481+32
12 Sept 2026, 03:003,449-8
7 Sept 2026, 14:023,457-10
2 Sept 2026, 12:163,467-2
30 Aug 2026, 08:553,469-2
27 Aug 2026, 11:133,471+8
24 Aug 2026, 18:583,463+8
20 Aug 2026, 18:533,455+4
17 Aug 2026, 16:273,451+2
14 Aug 2026, 19:083,449+49
10 Aug 2026, 23:583,400-1
7 Aug 2026, 20:103,401+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:333,400first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

138 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4331.2%
😁2417.4%
custom 53439391717256171182316.7%
1813.0%
👍107.25%
custom 522643124591894276364.35%
🤩64.35%
👏42.90%
❤‍🔥21.45%
💯10.725%
🤷‍♂10.725%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 11 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @data_new_gold. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC298 views7 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 534393917172561711843

4 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC451 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Только что настроил себе MCP Codex внутри Claude Code, и теперь даже не нужно ходить в VS Code для код ревью от ChatGPT-5.6 — ну ваще кааайф прям реально app Claude для меня становится единым окном и second brain Claude Code пишет код —> оптравляет сам промпт на код ревью в chatGPT по моей подписке, не API (он дороже) —> получает код ревью —> фиксит —> отправляет в github и все сделано в одном окне 🥳 Крч теперь всег

custom 53439391717256171188👍2

3 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC565 views28 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Решил вернуться в медиа поле в свой ДР, чтобы пожелать всем моим подписчикам найти свой дзен от той деятельности, которую вы сейчас ведете! 🥳 И неважно это работа в найме, время с семьей, хобби, предпринимательство — самое главное инвестировать свое время не потому что НАДО, а потому что ХОЧУ (тут тоже может быть надо, но оно не вопреки) Я к своим 29 годам после ухода в феврале из Т-Банка занимаюсь тем, что хочу: в

🔥156👏4custom 53439391717256171183

10 Jul 2026, 18:35 UTC892 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вчера был на Data Day. Много говорили о том, как ИИ меняет найм и саму работу аналитика. Честно, я немного ждал привычного: «ну всё, скоро всех заменят». Но ушёл скорее с другим ощущением. ИИ забирает ту часть работы, которую мы сами не очень любим: собрать первый контекст, достать данные, набросать запрос. А вот понять, что на самом деле происходит, связать цифры с бизнесом, принять решение и потом за него отвечат

🔥7

9 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC776 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Последний доклад: "Данные - это новая нефть" Сказано было 7 раз)) Помните название моего канала с 2022 года?)) Я знал, что будет в 2026 ахах 😂

👍5🔥5🤩4

8 Jul 2026, 19:58 UTC801 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

именно так я буду ехать на конфу завтра) дай бог доеду 🙏

😁24💯1🤷‍♂1

29 Jun 2026, 10:03 UTC≈1,070 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Уже в эту среду 1 июля иду на закрытый бесплатный бизнес-завтрак Бизнес-школы МФТИ + СБЕР с Дмитрием Кибкало 🚀 Тема встречи: «Где найти идею для следующего бизнеса, если текущий уже вырос» Когда: 1 июля, 10:00–12:00 Где: культурное пространство «ТЁПЛОЕ МЕСТО», Москва, Новокузнецкая, 1, стр. 1 Поговорим о том, как предпринимателю увидеть новую точку роста, найти сильную идею и не застрять в рамках уже построенного

3👍3

26 Jun 2026, 12:43 UTC896 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Что я вам скажу: какая бы безумная, странная идея вам не приходила — ПРОБУЙТЕ!!! В среду мне пришла мысль поставить демо для наших платящих репетиторов, в четверг я подумал, что нужно для всех наших репетиторов, в четверг в 15 я подумал, что нужно вообще все доступные каналы использовать — результат пушечный вышел) По цифрам: 3 платящих репетитора —> 15 всего репетиторов —> до демо сегодня в 10:00 в чате было 30 че

🔥9custom 52264312459189427636❤‍🔥1

25 Jun 2026, 16:17 UTC804 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🏆 Итоги розыгрыша билетов на Data Day 2026 Подвёл итоги! Всего участников было 22, рандом честно выбрал троих. Поздравляю победителей: 🎉 Elizar Gudmanov @gudmanov 🎉 rkh024 @rkh024 🎉 Iren Galygina @IrenManhattan Ребята, напишите мне в личку @Analyst_Vladimir в течение суток, передам билеты. Если кто-то не отзовётся за это время, выберу замену из остальных участников. Кто не выиграл в этот раз — обнял на удачу в

6🔥3🤩2

25 Jun 2026, 13:39 UTC786 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Завтра в 10:00 мск проводим с моим партнером демо Сократа AI Платформа для репетиторов по проверке ДЗ и пробников ЕГЭ, ОГЭ с помощью AI, в том числе рукописные работы. Наш репетитор по физике Егор сейчас проверяет 20 ДЗ за 20 минут вместо 2 часов, а ученики чаще сами доходят до правильного решения благодаря подсказкам AI в сократовском методе. Также есть расписание занятий, удобный банк заданий, учёт оплат и отчёты

🔥4❤‍🔥1

23 Jun 2026, 08:19 UTC811 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ребяята, мне выделили для вас 3 билета вместо двух 🥳 Так что залетайте, кто еще не успел — итоги послезавтра будут! Я уже зарегался как фаундер Сократ AI — увидимся на конфе)

custom 53439391717256171188

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @data_new_gold. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

karpov.courses
@KarpovCourses · 27,430
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Reveal the Data
@revealthedata · 27,839
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
LEFT JOIN
@leftjoin · 42,064
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
Job for Analysts & Data Scientists
@foranalysts · 36,643
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
Инжиниринг Данных
@rockyourdata · 23,767
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Data New Gold” (@data_new_gold), 3,481 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/data_new_gold.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.