Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 18 days, net -58. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,208–9,284 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 04:57
9,217
-26
17 Sept 2026, 10:37
9,243
-14
13 Sept 2026, 19:58
9,257
-6
10 Sept 2026, 06:41
9,263
-12
7 Sept 2026, 19:22
9,275
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 9,217 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held
13 (5 August 2026 – 7 September 2026)
Views total
9,866
Reactions total
469
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Sept 2026, 19:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
710 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
408
57.5%
🔥
90
12.7%
🤣
61
8.59%
💯
51
7.18%
😁
34
4.79%
👍
24
3.38%
👎
19
2.68%
😱
12
1.69%
😢
5
0.704%
❤🔥
4
0.563%
👨💻
2
0.282%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 710 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
сегодня провожу пробное со взрослой студенткой и силе о волнуюсь!
причем запрос привычный, нет никаких подводных камней в самой девушке, но ничего не могу с собой поделать, волнуюсь перед каждым пробником.
несмотря на 12 лет в преподавании …
коллеги, как у вас дела с волнением перед первым уроком обстоят? волнуетесь или уже на релаксе проводите?
да, я токсик, но как же бесит составлять расписание …
когда предлагаешь старенькому ученику 5 вариантов ТОПОВОГО вечернего времени и надо выбрать 2 слота, но ученик может только в 1 окно, потому что у него кружок макраме и и юного техника в это время …
и тебя просят подстроиться …
(не имею ничего против кружков, но если у ученика цель сдать экзамен по Английскому, то наверное нужно чуть чуть сместить приоритеты, к…
🍂 Настолка для осеннего warm up - ждет вас в комментариях
Если в качестве «спасибо» напишите что вас больше всего бесит в создании интерактивных уроков - буду признательна ❤️
🍁 Осенняя настолка для разминки на первых уроках после каникул
Боже, храни нейронки за то, что такую красоту я сделала за 4 минуты и теперь смогу годами ее применять
И да, в ней все интерактивное, и фишки, и кубик....теперь мне нужна какая то очень весомая причина, чтобы возвращаться к играм на Genially (кто работал с ней, тот знает, что там прям надо потратить время, чтобы сделать с 0)
Хотите скину вам тоже игру …
Как же хочется простого человеческого - быть учителем, а не составлять расписание, искать учеников и объяснять Васе, почему в 7 утра в воскресенье окошек для уроков нет…
💐 Но кажется, я нашла сервис, который может забрать большую часть этой рутины на себя - SecRep.
🫡 Здесь можно создать профессиональную страницу - рассказать о себе, образовании, опыте, подходе, направлениях, указать цены и добавить отзывы.
🔍А учен…
Пора идти работать в школу …
Вчера наткнулась на пост, где девушка грустит из-за того, что она репетитор и ей не дарят цветы, да и вообще никто не поздравил с 1 сентября даже смской…
Коллеги-репетиторы, а вас расстраивает отсутствие букетиков?
коллеги, поздравляю с 1 сентября всех причастных ❤️
надеюсь что в этом учебном году все цели учителей, репетиторов, ваших учеников, родителей, тьюторов, тренеров, наставников были достигнуты!
хотите денег - отлично
желаете не поехать кукухой - опа сюда мне тоже надо
главное, чтобы вы были здоровы, довольны и счастливы 😊
(ну а я занимаюсь любимой подготовкой к учебному году, стараюсь накупаться, назагораться и нае…
Шикарный сервис для легкого warm-up, от которого студенты точно не смогут замолчать.
📌 Сайт: WindowSwap
В чем суть: Люди со всего мира транслируют вид из своего окна (уютный дождь в Токио, горы Норвегии или шумная улица в Нью-Йорке).
Как используем на уроке:
1. Открываем случайное окно на 60 секунд.
2. Задача ученика - не просто уныло описать картинку («I see a tree»), а достроить реальность:
• Кто здесь живет?
•…
будьте острожны - контур.толк ввел ограничение на видео звонок на бесплатном тарифе - 40 минут ...
заметила сегодня прям перед уроком и было неприятно
чем будем заменять? или покупаем платный?
👎19😱12😢5❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @davai_propodavai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Балансовая (просто хочу быть в моменте, выйти из гонки и быть собой)20%
У меня своя цель, расскажу о ней в комментах0%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Прорыв в репетиторстве | Елизавета @esvasilevaru · 25,066 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
От репетитора к онлайн-школе | Илья Методайзер @methodyzer · 22,050 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
English Page @EnglishPage_WithYou · 25,987 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
ISTOR.ICHKA @istor_ichka · 30,167 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
Готовые уроки👩🏻🏫 @natali_lessons · 31,156 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Давай Преподавай” (@davai_propodavai), 9,217 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/davai_propodavai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.