Channel
@dawahsalafiyoon
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
262subscribers
+36 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002648098470 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dawahsalafiyoon |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dawahsalafiyoon |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 262 | +10 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:42 | 252 | +4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 248 | +11 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 237 | +4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 233 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 226 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 226 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
7 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
THE ASHʿARIS AND EXTREMISM IN TAKFĪR Shaykh ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz al-Rayyis حفظه الله said: Contemporary Ashʿarites—and their Māturīdī counterparts—continue attempting to falsely attribute takfīr (excommunication) to Ahl al-Sunnah, unjustly labeling them as "Wahhābīs." They slanderously claim that the so-called "Wahhābīs" are extremists who readily declare others to be disbelievers. However, when one examines the evidence,…
❤1
THE ASHʿARIS PRIORITIZING REASON OVER REVELATION Shaykh ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz al-Rayyis حفظه الله said: Among the most astonishing matters is that a man may ascribe himself to Islām while holding such a belief. Suppose the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ were among us and said something, and we replied: "O Messenger of Allāh, wait—let us first consult our intellects." Would any Muslim who believes in Allāh and the Last Day ever say…
❤1
THE SOURCE OF RELIGIOUS AUTHORITY ACCORDING TO THE ASHʿARITES Shaykh ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz al-Rayyis حفظه الله said: The Ashʿarites do not consider the non-mutawātir (mass-transmitted) Prophetic Sunnah to be authoritative in matters of creed. According to their view, āḥād reports (singularly transmitted narrations) do not constitute valid evidence in ʿaqīdah (creed). Therefore, they restrict matters of belief to the Qurʾān…
❤1
THE ABSENCE OF FOCUS AND DEVOUTNESS IN THE PRAYER, AND EXCESSIVE MOVEMENT DURING THE PRAYER Shaykh Ṣāliḥ Āl al-Shaykh حفظه الله said: Focus and solemnity (khushūʿ) are found in the heart, the stillness of the limbs, and humility before Allāh. Allāh praised His servants in His statement: "Those who offer their prayers with all solemnity and full submissiveness." — Sūrah al-Muʾminūn 23:2 And He, the Exalted, said: …
❤1
THE ABSENCE OF EASE AND TRANQUILITY THROUGHOUT THE PRAYER Shaykh Ṣāliḥ Āl al-Shaykh حفظه الله said: This is from the ignorance that has become common and widespread, and it is a clear sin, because tranquility is a pillar of the Ṣalāh, and the prayer is not correct without it. The ḥadīth of the man who prayed badly is clear evidence of this. The meaning of ease and tranquility in the Ṣalāh during its various moveme…
❤1
THE EXPLANATION OF PROOF VS THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PROOF Shaykh Abū Iyāḍ Amjad Rafīq حفظه الله said: A further issue requiring detail regarding the excuse of ignorance and the establishment of the proof (iqāmat al-ḥujjah), which the Ḥaddādiyyah use to stir tribulation among Ahl al-Sunnah, is whether a person is required to understand the proof or not. Their intent is to claim that a person merely needs to hear the pr…
❤2
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @dawahsalafiyoon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“جماعة الدعوة إلى السلفية” (@dawahsalafiyoon), 262 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dawahsalafiyoon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.