Channel
@daytonawardrobe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,565subscribers
+419 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001798911734 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @daytonawardrobe |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/daytonawardrobe |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 5,565 | +28 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:00 | 5,537 | +63 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 5,474 | +13 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 5,461 | +8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 5,453 | +49 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 5,404 | +13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:19 | 5,391 | +98 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 5,293 | +78 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:22 | 5,215 | +9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:22 | 5,206 | +7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 5,199 | +11 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 5,188 | +40 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 5,148 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 5,146 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
56 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 24 | 42.9% | |
| 💋 | 22 | 39.3% | |
| 👀 | 10 | 17.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
- BALMAIN PARIS FW15 '# DO YOU SPEAK BALMAIN' RED FOIL BLACK TEE BY OLIVIER ROUSTEING - BALMAIN × H&M 2015 CREST-BUTTON DOUBLE-BREASTED SATIN SHAWL BLAZER JACKET - SAINT LAURENT PARIS LION-HEAD BUCKLE BLACK LEATHER BELT - ALEXANDER WANG 'ROCKIE' STUD-BOTTOM BLACK LEATHER MINI BAG - DIOR HOMME RED DENIM BY KRIS VAN AASCHE - GUCCI GG-PIN SIDE-ZIP CAP-TOE BLACK LEATHER ANKLE BOOTS
💋3💯1
SAINT LAURENT PARIS LION-HEAD BUCKLE BLACK LEATHER BELT 16.000₽ — Size: 90cm — CONDiTiON: 9/10 — Царь зверей на поясе вместо логотипа: Saint Laurent отливает льва с той же барочной серьёзностью, с какой Версаль отливал своих львов у ворот. — Пряжка — скульптурная голова льва в состаренной бронзе: грива проработана прядями, морда с выраженной мимикой, взгляд исподлобья. Литьё тяжёлое, объёмное — вещь, которая ощущает…
💯1
GUCCI GG-PIN SIDE-ZIP CAP-TOE BLACK LEATHER ANKLE BOOTS 30.000₽ — Size: 8.5 (fit 43-43.5) — CONDiTiON: 9/10 — Ботинки, собранные по перчаточной логике: кожа мягче, чем у иных курток, а единственный знак дома — серебряная GG размером с запонку. — Силуэт вычищен до предела: отрезной кап на носу, плавные фигурные швы по берцу, скрытая боковая молния — и у верхнего канта единственная деталь, миниатюрный пин с переплетён…
💋1💯1
BALMAIN PARIS FW15 '# DO YOU SPEAK BALMAIN' RED FOIL BLACK TEE BY OLIVIER ROUSTEING 18.000₽ — Size: XS (fit M) — CONDiTiON: 9/10 — Вопрос эпохи, когда Balmain захватил инстаграм: красная фольга во всю грудь и хэштег вместо герба — Рустен первым понял, что язык моды теперь пишется капслоком. — Принт — металлизированная красная фольга с зеркальным бликом: три строки плакатного шрифта, которые читаются через улицу и го…
💯1
BALMAIN PARIS DOUBLE-ZIP RIBBED WAXED-STRIPE BLACK SLIM BIKER JEANS 40.000₽ — Size: 34 (fit L) — CONDiTiON: 9/10 — Доспех, отлитый в дениме: вощёный чёрный с дымными полосами, четыре молнии и рифление по всей анатомии — Balmain в полной боевой комплектации. — Покрытие — отдельная работа: воск положен вертикальными дымными полосами, и чёрный играет муаром — матовые и глянцевые дорожки сменяют друг друга при каждом дв…
💯4💋3👀2
HYSTERIC GLAMOUR BORO-PATCH REPAIRED SEPIA-TINT BLUE DENIM JEANS BY NOBUHIKO KITAMURA 18.000₽ — Size: 28 (fit XS-S) — CONDiTiON: 8.5/10 — Боро по-токийски: заплаты, бахрома и штопки-крестики — японская школа починки, в которой ремонт делает вещь дороже целой. — Ремонтная работа здесь ведётся по всем правилам жанра: прямоугольные заплаты глубокого индиго врезаны под прорехи с открытой бахромой, а по чистым участкам р…
💯6👀1💋1
тик ток ‘ спасибо брат daytona
💋11💯6👀5
- BALMAIN PARIS GOLD-BUTTON MILITARY WHITE COTTON LONGLINE SHIRT - PIERRE BALMAIN PARIS SS2011 HIGH-TOP LEATHER & CANVAS BONDAGE RANGER BOOTS BY CHRISTOPHE DECARNIN - DIOR HOMME 2020 STRAIGHT LEG WHITE DENIM JEANS BY KIM JONES
💯2👀1💋1
BALMAIN PARIS GOLD-BUTTON MILITARY WHITE COTTON LONGLINE SHIRT 14.000₽ — Size: 42 (fit S) — CONDiTiON: 8/10 — Золотые львиные пуговицы по всей планке — китель, переодетый в рубашку — Воротник-стойка и плотный ряд литых золотых пуговиц с львиной головой — фирменный балменовский военный код: рубашка скроена как офицерский китель, но в лёгком хлопке. Пуговицы продолжаются на погонах-эполетах и идут вереницей по манжете…
💋2💯2👀1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @daytonawardrobe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Daytona Wardrobe” (@daytonawardrobe), 5,565 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daytonawardrobe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.