Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Web3/空投/NFT作业转发

Channel

Web3/空投/NFT作业转发

@dddd_dddd_dddd_dddd

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,996subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001587722891
TypeChannel
Username@dddd_dddd_dddd_dddd
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dddd_dddd_dddd_dddd

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,9962,0112,003.528 August 2026 — 2,010 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,011 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,008 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,010 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,004 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,996 subscribers28 August 202618 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 20 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,994–2,013 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 02:181,996-8
13 Sept 2026, 12:552,004-6
9 Sept 2026, 21:212,010+2
1 Sept 2026, 07:272,008-3
28 Aug 2026, 21:282,011+1
28 Aug 2026, 15:452,010first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣743.8%
425.0%
💩425.0%
👀16.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2025 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 00:54 UTC458 viewsread 28 August 2026

MoonPay 空投 需要连接gpt或者A\ 空投20到500U不等,基本上等于提供你的数据换钱,看重隐私别连吧 领了想撤销权限: ChatGPT:设置 → 插件 → PayBox → 断开连接 X:设置 → 安全和账户访问 → 应用和会话 → 关联应用 → MoonPay 的 PayBox → 撤销应用权限 https://x.com/moonpay/status/2082459328208839074

29 Jul 2026, 04:08 UTC435 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Etherfi 可以下卡了,固定3%返现,邀请多1%返现。 EtherFi 返现 4%(卡 3%+邀请 1%),实际消费收益约 2.8% EtherFi 返现 3%(无邀请),实际消费收益约 1.8% 护照 + 海外地址+ 对应海外IP,地址在地图上选真实地址 KYC 走的是 Sumsub,直接通过没要地址证明。 https://www.ether.fi

2 Jun 2026, 06:48 UTC792 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @foresightnews

【TON 原生代币将更名为 Gram,Telegram CEO 称该网络正「回归初心」】 Foresight News 消息,据 The Block 报道,Telegram 首席执行官 Pavel Durov 表示,TON 的原生代币将更名为 Gram,恢复该项目在最初白皮书中的名称。其表示,「我们正在回归初心,并开启新篇章」。TON 将保留为区块链名称,Gram 成为原生货币名称,过渡期约三周。此前,Telegram 于 2018 年启动最初的 TON 项目,但在 2020 年因与美国证券交易委员会(SEC)的法律纠纷被迫停止销售 Gram 代币后,该项目被搁置。此后投资者提起诉讼,要求退还代币购买款项。随后,独立开发者接手了该项目,在 TON(The Open Network)的名称下继续推进。 https://foresightnews.pro/news/h5Detail/105554

1

18 Apr 2026, 05:46 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @theblockbeats

⚡️「币安人生」突破0.54美元,币价创历史新高 BlockBeats 消息,4 月 18 日,据 GMGN 行情信息,「币安人生」短时突破 0.54 美元,现报 0.53 美元,币价创历史新高,24 小时涨幅达 60.34%。 原文链接 https://m.theblockbeats.info/flash/341862

17 Apr 2026, 13:58 UTC≈1,070 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

不玩了,回到上币安前的价格了,算是又给我一个机会,这次跑了😂

🤣31

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dddd_dddd_dddd_dddd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

QK哈希实时观战频道
@lookqk · 49,194
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Web3/空投/NFT作业转发” (@dddd_dddd_dddd_dddd), 1,996 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dddd_dddd_dddd_dddd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.