Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for .

Channel

.

@dddfghbjkgd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001531178007
TypeChannel
Username@dddfghbjkgd
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 September 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/dddfghbjkgd

Growth

105 Sept 2026, 02:47 — 10 subscribers5 Sept 2026, 03:22 — 10 subscribers5 Sept 2026, 02:475 Sept 2026, 03:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9–11 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 03:2210no change
5 Sept 2026, 02:4710first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
40
Videos
1
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

107 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52107963151260252393028.0%
custom 52109327318772802541615.0%
custom 52110638915885638191413.1%
custom 52106833875509083281312.1%
custom 52108873984974683891312.1%
custom 5210704574624582983109.35%
custom 521085784482750924165.61%
custom 521099594520594053654.67%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2025 to 7 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2025, 12:32 UTC988 views23 reactionsread 5 September 2026

убубубуббу, канал закрывается, можете ливать. Я буду занят и не смогу делать посты, всем Джазака-Лляху хайран за продвижение, реакции и тому подобное 🙏

custom 521093273187728025411custom 52107963151260252394custom 52108873984974683894custom 52109959452059405364

26 Aug 2025, 07:43 UTC≈1,020 views16 reactionsread 5 September 2026

Ибн Аби Хатим передал от Мухаммада ибн Халида, от Яхья ибн аль-Мугира, сказавшего: "Я слышал Джарира ибн 'Абд аль-Хамида, сказавшего: В начале слова джахмитов мед, а в конце яд. Они только одно пытаются доказать: "Нет божества на небесах.

custom 52107963151260252395custom 52106833875509083284custom 52107045746245829834custom 52110638915885638193

25 Aug 2025, 12:54 UTC867 views10 reactionsread 5 September 2026

АбдуЛлах ибн ‘Иса (табиин) сказал: «На лице Умара ибн аль-Хаттаба были две черные полосы от слёз (т.е. из-за плача ради Аллаха)». 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ См. «Хильятуль-аулия» 1 / 51т

custom 52108873984974683894custom 52107963151260252393custom 52108578448275092413

22 Aug 2025, 11:28 UTC668 views9 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Передал ‘АбдуЛлах ибн Ахмад (ум. 290 г.х.): ”Мне рассказал мой отец, сказав: мне рассказал ‘Абдур-Рохман, от Суфьяна, от Абу Исхака, от ‘АбдуЛлаха ибн Холифы, от ‘Умара, что он сказал: «Когда Всевышний сел на ‘Арш был слышен скрип, словно скрип нового седла»” ———————————————- Передал это номером 570. ‘АбдуЛлах в своей «Китаб Ас-Сунна» Разберем тему с Исхаком и Ибн Холифой, их двоих считают сомнительными в э

custom 52106833875509083283custom 52107963151260252393custom 52108873984974683893

21 Aug 2025, 16:09 UTC291 views10 reactionsread 5 September 2026

Извиняюсь за отсутствие, был в отдыхе. Помните тот Асар от ‘Умара ( да будет доволен им Аллах)? Так вот, недавно написал мне ашарит, который пытался его послабить многими способами, а когда я начал приводить аргументы он начал оскорблять и писать невнятную чушь, которая не была мне понятна и я понял, что смысла продолжать этот бессмысленный разговор у меня нет. К сожалению сам чат удален, но его попытка послабить аса

custom 52110638915885638194custom 52107963151260252393custom 52109327318772802543

19 Aug 2025, 19:22 UTC275 views8 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

Укъба ибн ‘Амир, да будет доволен им Аллах, сказал: قال عقبة بن أمير رضي الله عنه: "قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم: "لو كان هناك نبي بعدي، لكان عمر بن الخطاب". «Посланник Аллаха ﷺ сказал: “Если бы после меня был пророк, то им бы был ‘Умар ибн аль-Хаттаб”». 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ (Сунан Ат-Тирмизи 3686/Абу ‘Иса ат-Тирмизи) сказал: Этот хадис хороший редкий, и мы знаем его только из хадиса Мишраха ибн Ха‘ана)

custom 52108578448275092413custom 52110638915885638193custom 52107963151260252392

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dddfghbjkgd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ЧП КЧР
@chpkchr_09 · 36,834
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 5 September 2026
Совесть 09
@sovest09_kchr · 30,350
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“.” (@dddfghbjkgd), 10 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dddfghbjkgd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.