Channel
@de_lunne
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
15subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 19 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002654268657 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @de_lunne |
| Created | 17 September 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 19 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/de_lunne |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:39 | 15 | +1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:01 | 14 | no change |
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:22 | 14 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 17 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (17 September 2025 – 19 October 2026) |
| Views total | 160 |
| Reactions total | 24 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Oct 2026, 22:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
46 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 43.5% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 37.0% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 6.52% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 4.35% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 4.35% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2025 to 19 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Запросы закрываю братья , я же не как вы , я же не как обычные люди , не как эти официанты, строители, уборщики и все остальные, кто себе на хлеб зарабатывает как может, кто каждый день гнёт спину чтобы просто прокормить семью , вам не прожить их жизнь, вам не понять их проблемы, их доля вам не выпадет, и ваша им не достанется , кто вы без отцовских машин? кто вы без того уважения, которое вам с рождения подарили, к…
❤3👏2🔥2
Вот такая вот собачка
❤3🔥3
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥3❤1
Сейчас я на последнем этапе Знания есть , Практика есть , Понимание есть Осталось только одно , свой депозит именно свой Поэтому я сейчас работаю в ресторане Сначала думал временно, пока накоплю а сейчас понимаю, что это было нужно когда просто сидишь за ноутбуком и учишься, легко забыть, как тяжело на самом деле даются деньги , каждый вечер тебя спускает на землю , ноги гудят, спина ноет, в голове начал реально цен…
❤3🔥2🤝2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤2
Обновление по челленджу Прошёл месяца как я начал этот эксперимент с 40 000 рублей Хотел показать честный путь человека, который пробует трейдинг с нуля На данный момент депозита больше нет , полностью ушёл в минус Сейчас я не торгую , взял паузу и плотно сижу на обучении: разбираю свои сделки, изучаю, где ошибался, работаю над психологией и стратегией Честно — было неприятно. Ожидал, что всё пойдёт быстрее и легч…
👍3❤2
April 21 : Сейчас начинается самое интересное в моем пути трейдера 45.000₽ ( 570$ ) Столько мне должно хватить для трейдинга
❤4
Пропал из телеги Больше 5 месяцев не вёл свой телеграм-канал Это время пролетело быстро, многое для себя понял, стал более сфокусирован Но теперь давайте вместе!
❤2👀2
Часы идут У кого-то время уходит, у кого-то работает на него. Я решил проверить, смогу ли я научиться превращать время в деньги через ТРЕЙДИНГ Это будет не теория — а путь с нуля, со всеми ошибками и находками Записываю каждую секунду здесь Считай это моим публичным экспериментом Каждый выбирает свою дорогу Мою сейчас зовут трейдинг. Не знаю, куда она приведёт — к прибыли или к ошибкам. Но я решил пройти её до ко…
🔥7
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @de_lunne. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“de lune” (@de_lunne), 15 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/de_lunne.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.