Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
𖨂 𝐖𝖎𝒏𝓬𝙝𝓮 𝖘𝒕𝐞𝓻 𝑺𝓮𝖓𝐢𝙤𝖗 - 𐚁
@deanw_da1ry
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
15subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 25 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003963833994 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @deanw_da1ry |
| Description | 𝗰𝗿 𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁 :: @vspmultiedi 𝘁𝘁 + 𝗺𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗡𝗼𝘁 𝟏𝟎𝟎% 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗼𝗻 |
| Created | 19 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 25 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/deanw_da1ry |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 15 | no change |
| 25 Sept 2026, 06:47 | 15 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 19 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 482.6%
- avg views ÷ 15 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 72.4
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (19 September 2026 – 20 September 2026) |
| Views total | 941 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 2
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 16s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤ ✧ 𝓜𝕡 !¡ ୧𓂃꫶ ✒️ 𝗢+ ▭▬ ☏ 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗮𝗹 – 𝟏𝟎 𝗺𝗶𝗻 💽 ּ ֗ ִ ˖ ࣪ 𝗗𝗡𝗜: 𝗮𝗯𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁 𓏵 ╭ 𝐂𝖔𝕟𝓷𝕖𝐜𝖙 ¡! 𓄲 𝗜'𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 (1) ⌑ 𓂅 𝗗𝗲﹫ 𝗻 𝗪𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗵𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁 📜 O2. 𝗦𝘂𝗴𝗴𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗻 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 ּ ֗ ִ ˖ ࣪ Ꮺ 🏈 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁 . . . 𝓬 𝐨𝖓𝓷𝕖𝖈𝓽 𝐥𝓲 𝖘𝕥 ↓
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤ ▭▬ 🗝 ⠞⢷⣄⣀⣀ ּ ֗ ִ 📺 ˖ ࣪ 🕸 𝗿𝘁 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁|𝗺𝗽 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁&𝗰𝗻 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁|𝗯𝗼𝗼𝘀𝘁 ⠷
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
꯭ ֔ׄ𓂃᯦ּ࡙ 🎞️ ִ° 𝄢 ּ ֗ ִ ▬ι𓆃 𓂅 Ꮺ⌑ 𝑩𝒜 𝑪𝑲 𝑰𝑵 𝑩𝑳﹫ 𝑪𝑲 (!) 📼 𖨂 ᡕᠵデᡁ᠊╾━ ✷ ˖ ࣪📀 ۫ ꯭𝆹𝅥𝂅𝗢𝗵 𝗺𝘆 𝗴𝗼𝗱, am I actually doing this? Writing in my d̲a̲i̲r̲y̲ like some schoolgirl? Oh shit! If anyone reads this, I'm 𝗱𝗲𝗮𝗱. ☏ ࣪ 𖥔 𝗠𝘆 name is 𝑫e̲a̲n̲ 𝑾i̲n̲c̲h̲e̲s̲t̲e̲r̲. I'm an Aquarius, I enjoy sunsets long walks on the beach and firsky w✧men. ࿐
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @deanw_da1ry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𖨂 𝐖𝖎𝒏𝓬𝙝𝓮 𝖘𝒕𝐞𝓻 𝑺𝓮𝖓𝐢𝙤𝖗 - 𐚁” (@deanw_da1ry), 15 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deanw_da1ry.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.