Channel
Dear Civil Engineer
@dearcivil
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,657subscribers
+38 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001201517541 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dearcivil |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dearcivil |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 2,657 | +10 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:10 | 2,647 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 2,647 | +5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 2,642 | +6 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 2,636 | +13 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 2,623 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 2,627 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 2,623 | +6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 2,617 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 2,619 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@govt_Jobs_Aspirant · 37,995
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 September 2026
@Civil_Engineering_Pdfs_Notes · 31,803
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026
@sscjegk · 31,287
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
@railwayjesse · 23,186
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 September 2026
@CivilKiGOLiOfficials · 41,069
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
@LAW_Notes_Llb_Notes · 22,571
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 20 September 2026
@TrulyEngineers · 38,938
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
@SSCJECIVILPLATFORM · 34,305
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
@pwengineerswallah · 109,384
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
@CivilJunctionOfficial · 75,660
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
@Civil_Engg_Mcq · 29,305
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
@CivilJobsJunction · 34,104
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dear Civil Engineer” (@dearcivil), 2,657 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dearcivil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.