Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Decoded By Atharva (AIIMS)

Channel

Decoded By Atharva (AIIMS)

@decodedbyAtharva

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

16,838subscribers

-1,484 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003897368023
TypeChannel
Username@decodedbyAtharva
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/decodedbyAtharva

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@decodedbyAtharva/413 · this entry25 Jul 2026, 12:58 UTC@AtharvaAggarwal/950925 Jul 2026, 12:58 UTC1.00under a minute
@decodedbyAtharva/416 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC@AtharvaAggarwal/951226 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@AtharvaAggarwal10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (64)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @AtharvaAggarwal. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

16,83818,32217,5807 August 2026 — 18,322 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,277 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,221 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,180 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,125 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,077 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,024 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,931 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,878 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,835 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,799 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,758 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,717 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,670 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,640 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,576 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,529 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,494 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,457 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,430 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,403 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,370 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,320 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,284 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,248 subscribers4 September 2026 — 17,163 subscribers8 September 2026 — 17,085 subscribers11 September 2026 — 16,995 subscribers13 September 2026 — 16,939 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,907 subscribers16 September 2026 — 16,876 subscribers18 September 2026 — 16,838 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net -1,484. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,615–18,545 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:1816,838-38
16 Sept 2026, 08:1716,876-31
14 Sept 2026, 13:5916,907-32
13 Sept 2026, 03:0116,939-56
11 Sept 2026, 02:0116,995-90
8 Sept 2026, 04:3717,085-78
4 Sept 2026, 21:5917,163-85
3 Sept 2026, 04:1717,248-36
1 Sept 2026, 22:3817,284-36
31 Aug 2026, 20:0517,320-50
30 Aug 2026, 18:1317,370-33
29 Aug 2026, 16:2817,403-27
28 Aug 2026, 13:4417,430-27
27 Aug 2026, 12:1817,457-37
26 Aug 2026, 08:5317,494-35
25 Aug 2026, 07:3517,529-47
24 Aug 2026, 09:1417,576-64
22 Aug 2026, 15:4717,640-30
21 Aug 2026, 08:1417,670-47
20 Aug 2026, 10:2617,717first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 38 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
57s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC≈3,070 viewsread 3 September 2026
Video

Kar loge yeh sawaal. NCERT based, exercise se derived, and 2017 pyq type. Still majority will not be able to solve. Abhyas batch mai yahi sab sawaal, NCERT hidden lines, special one liners summary question sab cover honge. Weekly once class, effect unimaginable hoga. Whatsapp us at - 9272327039

20 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC≈2,280 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @AtharvaAggarwalPhoto

Finally we are launching, most extensive and exclusive practice batch for just 50 Students, as i want ki we Have highest selection ratio❤️❤️ Features . 1. 20,000+ Biology Live Question practice 2. 90% repeat rate 3. Physics chemistry Q bank pdfs 4. Target wise practice 5. Minor Major Tests The price for the batch is ₹1999 and for first 20 students ₹300 off. Use code “DOCTOR” Link -https://synapseneet.educrypt.ai/

19 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC≈3,190 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Creating Q banks, Minor tests, good NCERT based majors excites me yaar.. Be it 1 am 3 am i will keep making questions ❤️ There are many students who are studying in different batches, but need AIIMS level practice. So i am planning for launching a batch in 2 days for extensive practice. I will make your practice 20,000+ MCQs of Biology in live class, just once a week man. I will also provide Physics chemistry 10,

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @decodedbyAtharva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTCAnonymous Poll434 voters

Preparing a lot for you all this year was underground for that since 15-20 days. How’s the josh yaar?

  1. Bohot high bhaiya46%
  2. Ok ok30%
  3. Bhaiya nahi kar paare34%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 Jul 2026, 14:08 UTCAnonymous Poll919 voters

What are your future plans? (Arranging a grand guidance webinar)🙌

  1. NEET 202765%
  2. Other course25%
  3. MBBS Abroad6%
  4. Selection hogaya MBBS11%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 24 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Decoded By Atharva (AIIMS)” (@decodedbyAtharva), 16,838 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/decodedbyAtharva.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.