Channel
@decoratorrf
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
677subscribers
+21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001277840426 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @decoratorrf |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/decoratorrf |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 677 | +6 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 671 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 668 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 667 | +5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:06 | 662 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 656 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 656 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
67 reactions across 4 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 50.7% | |
| 😍 | 15 | 22.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 13.4% | |
| custom 5316754738866301559 | 4 | 5.97% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 2.99% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 2.99% | |
| custom 5319086287632738551 | 1 | 1.49% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня прошла первая встреча группы Глубинная красота. Начали рассматривать ренессанс через контекст современности. Пришли к выводу огромной внутренней энергоемкости творцов той эпохи. Получили первые ключи от них. Пишу так, потому что пересказывать историю искусства не мой вариант. Связывать искусство прошлого с жизнью сейчас - актуализировать - это да, так глубже, тоньше и практичнее. Информация так и останется…
😍7
Пазл сложила, прожила и выпускаю в материю. С 30.07 на месяц собираю группу «Глубинная красота». Тема огненная, не клишированная, мы вместе нырнем в историю искусств и вынырнем с ключами, которые нам откроют двери и как специалисту в построении пространств и как живому человек. Тема месяца: «ЭХО РЕНЕССАНСА» Что будем совместно рассматривать: ⏺️Что нам дала эпоха Ренессанса и как забрать это в современность. ⏺️Сим…
❤6🤩2❤🔥1🕊1😍1custom 53167547388663015591
Кто-то пройдёт мимо, а кто-то исцелиться об нее. История свежая, события актуальные. Когда рядом искажения, вселенная всеми способами способна показать чистую картинку. Главное, быть готовым и открытым увидеть и принять. Что же я пожелала сыну в день его рождения? Сохранить в памяти случай у купола, сохранить состояние радости и единства, который испытал около «неба» и знать, что мир открыт и все едины.
❤17❤🔥7🕊1
В квартире, которую мы снимали во Флоренции, окна выходили на комнату в соседнем доме, расстояние было нескромно близким, а желание рассмотреть детали огромным (муж ругался, что очень неэтично вот так смотреть в чужую квартиру)… согласна… но все равно подходила и аккуратно рассматривала. А там было на что посмотреть: роскошное изголовье в стиле барокко, отделанное серо-голубым бархатом, напротив кровати ближе к углу…
❤11😍7custom 53167547388663015593❤🔥1custom 53190862876327385511
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @decoratorrf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алхимия пространства | Регина Ипполитова” (@decoratorrf), 677 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/decoratorrf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.