@w1xiii, ты у меня ассоциируешься с аньчиком

Channel
резы интерактивов и тд
@dee1wsInteractive
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003901237250 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dee1wsInteractive |
| Created | 8 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dee1wsInteractive |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 3 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 5 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 4 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 4 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
@liksan_67, ты у меня ассоциируешься с macтикой
@jannelw0,ты у меня ассоциируешься с бустером
@quwsid, ты у меня ассоциируешься с егориком
@veshk1n2,ты у меня ассоциируешься с новки
@AsisKebab2,ты у меня ассоциируешься с ростиком
@lavochkatokpocki,ты у меня ассоциируешься с эксайлом
@vok1ss,ты у меня ассоциируешься с корешем
@ugl1flexa, ты у меня ассоциируешься с дипинсом
@e7n00, ты у меня ассоциируешься с парадеевичем
@fathmm08,ты у меня ассоциируешься с даноном
@lukoshkaa, ты у меня ассоциируешься с генсухой
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @dee1wsInteractive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,401,792 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@e7n00 · 1611 postfathmm08
@fathmm08 · 281 post𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼 ㅤ𓏵
@jannelw0 · 71 postлавочка токпоки
@lavochkatokpocki · 1141 postlıksaŋ/закрыто
@liksan_67 · 231 postстикеры от лукошки🕊️
@lukoshkaa · 3281 postкувсид :0
@quwsid · 351 postflex up
@ugl1flexa · 1221 postрест - veshkin
@veshk1n2 · 331 postvøkś
@vok1ss · 551 postⓘ݁ᛪ༙ ŵı1xìīí .
@w1xiii · 4631 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@dee1wsInteractive named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026 · confirmed gone 2 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“резы интерактивов и тд” (@dee1wsInteractive), 3 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dee1wsInteractive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.