Channel
@deeplearnme
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
690subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001629671850 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @deeplearnme |
| Description | Чат: https://t.me/deeplearnme_chat Канал про IT, ML, DL, Research, Python и к ним прилегающее YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs46uHl7ngm6TTjpFzQHfqA Канал про мою жизнь в Нью-Йорке: https://t.me/korney3_travel |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/deeplearnme |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 18:22 | 690 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 24 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
169 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 18.9% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 18.3% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 16.0% | |
| 🥰 | 27 | 16.0% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 4.73% | |
| custom 5204044811220295470 | 7 | 4.14% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 4.14% | |
| 🏆 | 6 | 3.55% | |
| 🙈 | 6 | 3.55% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 3.55% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 3.55% | |
| custom 6021631684720463411 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.592% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.592% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2024 to 26 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Маленький UPD У ghostty не имплементирована пока что фича поиска по терминалу, i.e. cmd+F 🤡 В качестве решения предлагается использовать tmux и аналоги, пока фича в разработке. На гите есть длиннотред, пока в ближайших релизах фичу не обещают https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/issues/189 В общем, пока-пока хайповые терминалы, я обратно в iterm 👋
😭5❤1👍1🤡1
Начинаем понедельник с грустного В пятницу у меня случился коллапс на алгоритмическом интервью с медиум литкодом Задачка похожая на воть: https://leetcode.com/problems/swap-adjacent-in-lr-string/description/ Я долго сопротивлялась, но, кажется, придется все-таки ботать литкод 😢
❤2😭2👍1
Еще милоты с моей работы Во-первых, с прошедшим днем числа пи Во-вторых, команда, которая занимается одним из продуктов нашей компании, который называется PyMol (уже чувствуете, куда это идет??), сделала релиз новой версии на той неделе В общем, номер релиза 3.1.4 (вау!), так что релиз тематический - https://www.schrodinger.com/platform/products/pymol/ Py от python (наверное) превращается в pi, Mol от molecule в …
🥰11❤2
File, posted without a caption
POV: тебя настигают дедлайны (но ты быстрее!), поэтому тратишь весь вечер на выбор красивой темы для нового терминала 👋 Или увидела у коллеги на работе новый терминал для зумеров (а я-то все сидела на iterm-е и думала, что я продвинутая....😐) В общем, для тех, кто в танке, как и я: создатель Terraform выпустил свой новый терминал - Ghostty 👻 https://ghostty.org/ Он написан на языке Zig (вы не знаете его? вот и я …
🔥12🥰3❤1
Video, posted without a caption
😢8👍2😁1
😭😭😭😭 Если вы на этой неделе еще не выделили времени "для себя", чтобы позаниматься самобичеванием по поводу того, что вы делаете недостаточно - вечер пятницы отличное время для этого! Не благодарите #memes
🥰12🙈6👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤7
все так #memes
Я вот жаловалась на докер а не наши кривые лапки в апреле Во-первых, я нажаловалась не на ту команду в Dockerfile 😂 Поэтому вношу коррективы. Во-вторых, оказывается, та команда, на которую я ругалась, на самом деле проблему решает, поэтому заодно рассказываю, как пофиксить 💃 TLDR: === У нас в Dockerfile была команда, которая устанавливала наш фреймворк `pip install`ом по ссылке, а-ля RUN pip install https://FILES…
👍6❤1
Кстати по ходу соревнования столкнулась с очевидной проблемой: входной сsv файл весил ~50gb, и после первых экспериментов я поняла, что, когда я использую его head для обучения, распределение данных вообще не похоже на тестовое, так что его надо было перемешать. Пока искала способы помешать гигантский csv, нашла такой прикольный алгоритм - merge shuffle. Он использует жесткий диск вместо того, чтобы загружать все в R…
🏆6👍3🔥1
Еще недавно завершилось соревнование на Каггле по предсказанию молекулярных свойств, про которое я писала туть. Я даже лениво в нем поучаствовала, пытаясь организовать на моем маке обучение XGBoost модели на данных размером ~200*10^6 строк с использованием фичи в XGBoost, которая позволяет делать загрузку данных on-fly по типу даталоадеров для нейросеток (писала про фичу тут). Спойлер: для всех featurized данных мое…
🤡5👍4🔥2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @deeplearnme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Deep Learn Me” (@deeplearnme), 690 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deeplearnme.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.