Channel
@deeploveflood
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
39subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002395568445 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @deeploveflood |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/deeploveflood |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 39 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:19 | 41 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 43 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 42 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 42 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 43 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
17 reactions across 4 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5348563928085462346 | 4 | 23.5% | |
| custom 5447360523924439757 | 4 | 23.5% | |
| custom 5467445246994444895 | 3 | 17.6% | |
| custom 5348113166972777414 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5348555226481718875 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5467817603479141879 | 2 | 11.8% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ᅟᅟᅟ⋆𐙚｡⋆𖦹 𝐍3ಭ 𝕌𝑵10𝓝𓍢ִ໋ 𓈒 ׄ 𑇛 ݂ 새로운 노동조합!!! ℂИ𝐻384 0𝑲Ꭾ𝕐ЖИЛ4 Ꮇ3𝙃Я. 8𝘾Ё 80𝒦ᖘ𝕐Г П𝙋30Бℙ4ЗИ8 Э𝕋0 𝐓4К. И𝑀3Ⱨℍ0 𝙏Ы 𝐓0Ŧ 𝑪4ᎷЫЙ MUГ 𝐵 𝟓:𝟓𝟑. 𝑪 Ŧ0Б∅Й Э𝕋0𝐓 ᎷИ𝙋 ИN0Й 𝙏4𝓚 П𝑷3Кᖘ4𝘾3ℕ.🍢 𝐻4Д33Ꮇ𝑪Я N4 Д0ЛГUЙ И 𝒦𝙋3П𝑲ИЙ 𝘾0ЮЗ
Sticker, posted without a caption
: : силам зла устоять не дано, пока четыре сердца как одно
#сзрп
Sticker, posted without a caption
ᅠ 사랑 | 𝑫ᘓep Lõv౿ .com 🍪 𝖡𝗒 Ian 𝗶𝖽 : not ours 𝒩 ew 𝓥 id⃨ⲉo 💖 < t𝗶kto̸𝗸 >
custom 53485552264817188752custom 53485639280854623462custom 54473605239244397572custom 54674452469944448951
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔤🪼New Uniσn . . ———————————————— два чудесных флуда заключили союз! ♡ you & me ———————————————— очень рады сотрудничеству!! 💙
Sticker, posted without a caption
２９.０６- !! 🤩ew union❨ ❤️ ❩ ^^ 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑚𝑎𝑘𝑒 𝑚𝑒 𝑓𝑒𝑒𝑙 𝑙𝑖𝑘𝑒 𝑖 𝑎𝑚 𝑓𝑢𝑛 𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝙙𝙚𝙚𝙥 𝙡𝙤𝙫𝙚 & 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙞𝙗𝙖𝙡 надеемся на долгий и крепкий союз💕
Sticker, posted without a caption
ᅠ 사랑 | 𝑫ᘓep Lõv౿ .com 🍪 𝖡𝗒 Karina 𝗶𝖽 : not ours 𝒩 ew 𝓥 id⃨ⲉo 💖 < t𝗶kto̸𝗸 >
custom 53481131669727774142custom 53485639280854623461custom 54473605239244397571custom 54674452469944448951custom 54678176034791418791
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @deeploveflood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@deeploveflood named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“레몬 | 𝑫e𝗲𝗽 𝙡ov𝗲 ׅ ⌁ ׁ ׅ” (@deeploveflood), 39 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deeploveflood.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.