Channel
@delaruf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
233subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001833153208 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @delaruf |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/delaruf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 233 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 235 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 235 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
55 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 50.9% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 29.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 14.5% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 3.64% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
/birthday edition/ Как бы ни хотелось остановить время, но очередные итоги года не заставляют себя ждать. Кажется, все пролетело настолько быстро, словно во сне. Что неудивительно, сегодня был дождь (ежегодно 16 июля я попадаю под дождь) Что удивительно, в этом году было много Москвы: успела трижды туда съездить, сходить в гости к Main buro, защитить проект в маси, впервые побывать на архмоскве, сделать свой первый …
❤2❤🔥2🥰1
/Today is a sunny day/
🔥9
/До чего доводит желание вайбово попить кофе/ После защиты уехала путешествовать по Ставропольскому краю. Абсолютное отсутствие задач и проектов, каждодневные прогулки и ползанье по горам должно было принести желание заняться чем-то новым в архитектуре, но нет.. я все равно не могу вернуться к диплому и сделать его качественное описание. Конкурсы воспринимаются как что-то навязчивое, а окружающая природа слишком при…
❤9❤🔥4🔥4
/10 минут импровизации + 5 минут "как?что?где?куда?" + 5 минут оскорблиментов = 1 дипломированный специалист/ #диплом
❤7🔥3
/Дневник дипломника part. 05/ #диплом месяц о, боже май Экстренно переделываю оформление всех основных чертежей, привожу визуалки в чистовой вид, д5 отказался работать без впн, а после и вовсе перестал открываться из-за веса файла, чат гпт и фш моё все. Оформляю альбом рабочих чертежей и прохожу вторую кафедралку в индивидуальном порядке. Допуск есть и диплом наконец родился! (С недочетами и косяками, но все же) по…
❤5
/Прогулка по вечерней Москве то, что было нужно перед возвращением к южному солнцу/ 4 часа неспешного созерцания, начиная от а-феста на ермолаевском, заканчивая матрешкой Москвы (от main buro) в зарядье Выставка в ММОМА оказалась очень маленькой, но интересной В парки и скверики привезли много растений, в центре появились пальмы. Просто сидеть на лавочке и наблюдать за стройкой новых павильонов, за множеством людей,…
❤5❤🔥2🤩2
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @delaruf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“delaruf” (@delaruf), 233 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/delaruf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.