Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дела | true crime

Channel

Дела | true crime

@delatruecrime

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

11,016subscribers

-206 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002397567153
TypeChannel
Username@delatruecrime
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/delatruecrime

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,01611,52511,270.56 August 2026 — 11,222 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,222 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,249 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,260 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,263 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,286 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,525 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,456 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,426 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,404 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,263 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,239 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,217 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,201 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,179 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,161 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,143 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,124 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,109 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,107 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,097 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,087 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,084 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,083 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,071 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,064 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,059 subscribers7 September 2026 — 11,045 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,016 subscribers6 August 202611 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 36 days, net -206. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,940–11,601 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 00:4011,016-29
7 Sept 2026, 23:4011,045-14
5 Sept 2026, 00:1611,059-5
2 Sept 2026, 03:4311,064-7
1 Sept 2026, 02:3611,071-12
30 Aug 2026, 23:3411,083-1
29 Aug 2026, 23:3611,084-3
28 Aug 2026, 22:3411,087-10
28 Aug 2026, 00:0311,097-10
27 Aug 2026, 01:2811,107-2
25 Aug 2026, 04:2411,109-15
24 Aug 2026, 02:4611,124-19
22 Aug 2026, 08:3711,143-18
20 Aug 2026, 20:0311,161-18
19 Aug 2026, 17:2111,179-22
18 Aug 2026, 14:2411,201-16
17 Aug 2026, 15:4711,217-22
16 Aug 2026, 07:2211,239-24
14 Aug 2026, 19:1511,263-141
13 Aug 2026, 10:3511,404first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.6%
avg views ÷ 11,016 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,920
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held29 (23 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total66,620
Reactions total2,601
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 02:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 15s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,157 reactions across 29 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,81167.6%
custom 525151968749316760150012.0%
🔥49011.8%
custom 53436395462171178051323.18%
👍832.00%
😱701.68%
💯501.20%
👏150.361%
👎60.144%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,157 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 15:27 UTC≈1,380 views163 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

С днём знаний! Решили пофантазировать и представить наших парней в роли учителей. Происходили ли в вашей школе какие-то странные ситуации? Может, даже нарушения?

115custom 525151968749316760125custom 534363954621711780520👍3

31 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC≈1,820 views79 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Ужасная история от Саши Богадовки СМОТРЕТЬ ВЫПУСК

48custom 534363954621711780521custom 52515196874931676017👏3

28 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC≈3,080 views93 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🔴Вы когда-нибудь слушали вживую криминальную историю от Димы Позова в окружении 200 человек в зале с приглушённым светом? 17 сентября в Москве состоится именно такой вечер😈 Мы не знаем, когда будет следующее мероприятие в Москве, потому чтоу уже в октябре мы отправимся в тур по России. Так что не упустите возможность попасть на концерт! Билеты тут: https://delatruecrime.intickets.ru/event/54424001/ Про какое дело

67custom 525151968749316760116🔥7👍3

26 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC≈5,820 views157 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Антон Шастун рекомендует фильм «Визит» Если не видели этот фильм, сохраните рилс, чтобы не забыть эту рекомендацию🔥

105custom 525151968749316760134custom 534363954621711780514👍3🔥1

26 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC≈2,810 views71 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Повезло, что старшая сестра сообщила об этом… Смотреть выпуск

55custom 525151968749316760113custom 53436395462171178053

25 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC≈16,500 views97 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Отец даже не наказал сына🤯 Смотреть выпуск

67😱18custom 525151968749316760111👎1

25 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC≈3,170 views218 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Дима Позов уже провёл 5 выпусков «Дел» — и это только начало🔎 Если что-то пропустили — это плейлист со всеми выпусками

154🔥45💯11custom 52515196874931676018

24 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC≈2,340 views104 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Смотрели этот фильм? Какие эмоции вызвала у вас медсестра?

68custom 525151968749316760117👍14🔥5

24 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC≈4,310 views218 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Когда вы смотрите тру-крайм, вы больше Дима Позов или Антон Шастун? Ждём ответа тут👇🏼 ▶️А ещё обязательно смотрите выпуск Дел с Юлей Ахмедовой и Антоном

172🔥32custom 534363954621711780510custom 52515196874931676014

22 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈3,010 views113 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🔴Осенью «Дела» едут в тур по России. Хотим, чтобы вы знали, что вас ждёт на концертах! Если вы уже приняли решение, тогда билет можно купить тут: https://comedyconcert.ru/performer/true-crime-vecher-dela Октябрь 2026 Краснодар — 15 октября Ростов-на-Дону — 16 октября Тюмень — 24 октября Омск — 25 октября Ноябрь 2026 Нижний Новгород — 6 ноября Казань — 15 ноября Декабрь 2026 Саратов — 5 декабря Волгоград — 6 де

77🔥24custom 53436395462171178058custom 52515196874931676014

21 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈5,430 views198 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Почему Антон решил прийти в гости на подкаст «Дела» второй раз?

126custom 525151968749316760151🔥18👍2👎1

21 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈5,080 views246 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Антон, прости, нам надо было подготовиться к твоему приходу получше! Смотрите «Дела» с Юлей Ахмедовой и Антоном Шастуном прямо сейчас в VK Видео🖤

161🔥48custom 525151968749316760137

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @delatruecrime. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@delatruecrime edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 August 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дела | true crime” (@delatruecrime), 11,016 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/delatruecrime.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.