Концепты флагов штрассеристкой России и штрассеристкой западнославии
❤9😁1
Signed Fritz

Channel
@delete_elite
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
222subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003052400192 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @delete_elite |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/delete_elite |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 222 | +3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:17 | 219 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 222 | +7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 215 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:21 | 214 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 213 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
68 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 49 | 72.1% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 13.2% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 11.8% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.47% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Концепты флагов штрассеристкой России и штрассеристкой западнославии
❤9😁1
Signed Fritz
🇨🇳 НАЦИ-МАОИЗМ: Штрассеризм или Гитлеризм? 🇨🇳 В политическом спектре принято считать, что левое и правое не пересекаются. История показывает обратное: самые опасные для системы идеологии рождаются именно на стыке. Наци-маоизм — один из таких гибридов. Для одних это оксюморон, для других — попытка соединить красный террор с коричневой эстетикой. Но если разобраться, это очень похоже штрассеризм, переведённый на язык…
❤9👍5🔥1
Signed Fritz
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5
Signed 𝐀𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨🇩🇪
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5
Signed 𝐀𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨🇩🇪
Вы блять ахуели, ответ единая Россия был чтоб проверить накрутят мне голоса или нет
Signed Fritz
Хотели бы вы видеть программный документ российских штрассеристов на подобии "германии завтра"?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😁7
Signed Fritz
Posted without readable text
❤5👍3
Signed Fritz
ᴅᴇʟᴇᴛᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇʟɪᴛᴇ pinned a file
ᴅᴇʟᴇᴛᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇʟɪᴛᴇ pinned a file
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4
Почему Отто Штрассер был толстопузым? В 1914 году, когда началась Первая мировая война, Отто Штрассеру было всего 16 лет. Он ушел на фронт добровольцем. На войне он провел несколько лет, служил в артиллерии, был ранен и получил железный крест. Служба в артиллерии и окопная жизнь требовали большого сжигания калорий, а на фронте, в германской армии был жесткий дефицит продовольствия. Солдаты банально недоедали. Но он …
❤7😁1
Штрассеризм картинки, скачать #арты @delete_elite
❤5👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @delete_elite. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Хотели бы вы видеть программный документ российских штрассеристов на подобии "германии завтра"?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᴅᴇʟᴇᴛᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇʟɪᴛᴇ” (@delete_elite), 222 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/delete_elite.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.