Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дело случая

Channel

Дело случая

@delosl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

96subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001974094712
TypeChannel
Username@delosl
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/delosl

Growth

959695.59 August 2026 — 96 subscribers10 August 2026 — 96 subscribers25 August 2026 — 95 subscribers1 September 2026 — 96 subscribers9 August 20261 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 95–96 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 08:4496+1
25 Aug 2026, 08:1795-1
10 Aug 2026, 02:4196no change
9 Aug 2026, 23:0196first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 21s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

184 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7138.6%
🤣3619.6%
🔥3116.8%
💯115.98%
custom 541125935241156181294.89%
custom 541153103486284171873.80%
❤‍🔥63.26%
💔31.63%
🤝31.63%
custom 527383342557535557121.09%
🐳21.09%
🆒10.543%
🍌10.543%
😭10.543%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @delosl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2025 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC33 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @psy_vstrechi

Грасьела Бродски приводит пример, на первый взгляд, «не классического применения» техники коротких сеансов. Она рассказывает о пациенте, который искал именно лакановского аналитика, и ему посоветовали обратиться к ней. Когда он пришел, он рассказал о том, что в юности прошел длительный фрейдовский анализ и что теперь ему нужна женщина-аналитик, лаканистка. После сказанного он удивляется и когда аналитик останавлива

🔥5

2 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC45 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Почему в лакановском анализе мы не привязаны к 50 минутам сессии? Короткий кадр часто обвиняют в том, что аналитик якобы вводит свой господский указ, действует из своей прихоти, останавливает сеанс тогда, когда бедолаге-анализанту ещё так хочется выговориться. Ведь всё самое «вкусное», как заведено, он оставил напоследок. В конце концов, уплачено за 50 минут, так отрабатывайте, хитрецы и обманщики. Но суть в том,

custom 541125935241156181274❤‍🔥3🆒1

31 Jul 2026, 11:26 UTC52 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Жизнь слишком коротка, чтобы тратить её на годы анализа? Наверняка вы сталкивались с новомодными тенденциями к быстрой терапии, быстрым результатам, быстрому росту, быстрому образованию, быстрым видео на х2, быстрым свиданиям, «быстрой» еде. Быстро, быстро, быстро. Быстро, потому что жизнь слишком коротка, нужно успеть всё. Достичь невероятных успехов, потребить то, что ещё не успели. Наслаждаться еще больше и бо

8

2 Jun 2026, 19:43 UTC210 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Размышляя на тему «домохозяйка я ВЕИПовская или всё-таки право имею», нахожу утешение в том, что мир устроен сложнее любых профессиональных ярлыков. Иногда Фрейда бережнее читают под церковными сводами, чем в IPA.

6❤‍🔥2🤝1

26 May 2026, 13:26 UTC235 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

«Еще кое-что, прежде чем вы начнете. Ваш рассказ в одном пункте должен все-таки отличаться от обычной беседы. Если обычно вы с полным правом пытаетесь в ходе своего изложения сохранять связность и отбрасывать все мешающие и посторонние мысли, чтобы, как говорится, не перескакивать с пятого на десятое, то здесь вы должны поступать по-другому. Вы обнаружите, что во время рассказа у вас появятся разные мысли, которые ва

6🔥3🤝2

4 May 2026, 08:50 UTC275 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Навеяно страданиями, в попытках уже не первый год понять граф желания Лакана….

5🤣2❤‍🔥1🔥1😭1

1 May 2026, 10:15 UTC261 views13 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Video

Здоровые отношения, которых не существует.

7💯6

30 Apr 2026, 18:28 UTC380 views17 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Video

Погружение в отчаяние и фрустрацию вне Хогвартса 🪄

9🤣3custom 54115310348628417183🐳2

26 Apr 2026, 07:01 UTC225 views10 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026

Если вы ревнуете без причины, это ещё не значит, что причины нет. Возможно, она просто не там, где вы её ищете. На просторах интернета тема ревности и уверенности в себе идут рука об руку. Если ревнует, значит, не уверен в себе. Человек, уверенный в себе, соответственно, такой ерундой заниматься не будет, он знает себе цену. Но если хоть чуть-чуть присмотреться к этой нелогичной связке, то, вероятно, может возникнут

6🔥3🍌1

25 Apr 2026, 08:38 UTC585 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Любители Лакана поймут 🫶

🤣5💯3🔥31

25 Apr 2026, 08:11 UTC150 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Итак, поставьте себя на место врачей и хирургов, которые спасли ребенка, обреченного на смерть, и он им говорит: “Я хочу умереть”. Им это непонятно, и поэтому они позвали меня, психоаналитика, чтобы понять вместе с вами, действительно ли вы хотите умереть или вы хотите жить, но не знаете как. «И если вы хотите со мной говорить, вы это сделаете» (он закрыл глаза), «...вы мне дадите знак веками, поскольку вы не можете

8💔3🔥2

19 Mar 2026, 08:17 UTC181 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

У меня только один вопрос: уже есть такой же на включение?

🤣12custom 54115310348628417184custom 541125935241156181221

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @delosl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дело случая” (@delosl), 96 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/delosl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.