Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝘿𝙚𝙡𝙩𝙖𝙉𝘿𝘿(!)

Channel

𝘿𝙚𝙡𝙩𝙖𝙉𝘿𝘿(!)

@deltandd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

173subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002773823890
TypeChannel
Username@deltandd
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/deltandd

Growth

173176174.58 August 2026 — 176 subscribers8 August 2026 — 176 subscribers24 August 2026 — 174 subscribers31 August 2026 — 173 subscribers8 August 202631 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 23 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 173–176 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 00:53173-1
24 Aug 2026, 23:27174-2
8 Aug 2026, 13:46176no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:46176first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 20 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

113 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥3631.9%
🔥2320.4%
custom 54607251951342324231311.5%
💋119.73%
😨119.73%
💘97.96%
💔54.42%
😱54.42%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 22:06 UTC49 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кто жив в этом тгк скажу сразу, я его в скором времени закрою и уйду из фд. Буду следить периферийным зрением за тем, что происходит в лофд и мб рисовать по праздникам что-то, но выкладывать буду все в другом тгк. Возможно вообще буду вести чисто творческий блог без каких-то упоминаний фандомов, пока что не знаю, но мысли об этом присутсвуют. Короче, можете смело отсюда отписываться потому что посты тут больше не буд

😨11💔5😱3

Signed SWAG

6 Jun 2026, 23:18 UTC149 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Смотрели вчерашний матч стримеров и блокеров? За кого болели? 👋 #скетч #лололошка #футбол

🔥11❤‍🔥4custom 54607251951342324232

Signed KATE SWAG

24 May 2026, 21:40 UTC186 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всё, следующий пост будет через год✋

❤‍🔥6

Signed KATE SWAG

24 May 2026, 21:39 UTC179 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Раз в 100 лет вспоминаю, что умею рисовать. Вау #шк

❤‍🔥10🔥3custom 54607251951342324232💋1

Signed KATE SWAG

23 Apr 2026, 19:37 UTC231 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Уиииииии, спасибо всем за поздравления! Мнебыло безумно приятно это слышать🤚 Хороший день был, мнн все понравилось🫀 Подарочки от Блуста, Шамрока, Асы и Олежи

custom 54607251951342324238💘4💋3

Signed KATE SWAG

22 Apr 2026, 21:04 UTC254 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟 Наступило 23 апреля, а это значит, что я стала на год старше! 🤩 Много чего произошло в этом году, были и плохие и хорошие моменты, но если подводить итоги, то в большей степени я довольна тем, что у меня есть сейчас. Я стала куда больше общаться с людьми из реалтной жизни, да, увы, меньше рисовать, но в артах все равно есть заметный прогресс и я не планирую останавливаться😰 Единственное чем я не довольна

❤‍🔥7💘5💋2custom 54607251951342324231

Signed KATE SWAG

19 Apr 2026, 16:56 UTC175 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Наконец-то дорисовали мой приз за конкурс! Красота да и только🙏 Автор арта - https://t.me/Rayana_DiLoRi #приз #арт

🔥9❤‍🔥4💋1

Signed KATE SWAG

20 Mar 2026, 17:31 UTC270 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕ 2 МЕСТО

❤‍🔥5

Signed KATE SWAG

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @deltandd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝘿𝙚𝙡𝙩𝙖𝙉𝘿𝘿(!)” (@deltandd), 173 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deltandd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.