Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DemoFürAlle

Channel

DemoFürAlle

@demofueralle

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,168subscribers

+535 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001382140006
TypeChannel
Username@demofueralle
Created16 October 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/demofueralle

Topic

Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,6332,1751,9046 August 2026 — 1,633 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,633 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,634 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,633 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,164 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,166 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,169 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,170 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,173 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,174 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,175 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,172 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,171 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,168 subscribers2,1686 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net +535. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,552–2,256 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:212,168-3
14 Sept 2026, 14:372,171-1
11 Sept 2026, 02:362,172-3
5 Sept 2026, 17:182,175+1
2 Sept 2026, 00:352,174+1
30 Aug 2026, 10:072,173+3
27 Aug 2026, 18:472,170+1
22 Aug 2026, 12:242,169+3
18 Aug 2026, 20:572,166+2
16 Aug 2026, 03:372,164+531
12 Aug 2026, 12:241,633-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:111,634+1
6 Aug 2026, 07:201,633no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:491,633first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

224 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍14363.8%
🔥229.82%
🤬135.80%
🤯135.80%
😢125.36%
❤114.91%
👎94.02%
😁10.446%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 232 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC247 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Neues Video-Interview mit ehemaligen Schulleiter: Was das Smartphone mit Kindern macht 🎥 Neues Video-Interview: Hedwig v. Beverfoerde interviewt den ehemaligen Schulleiter und Publizisten Michael Hageböck in der elften Folge von "Fokus Familie" über Smartphones, Social Media etc. ➡️ Michael Hageböck schildert, was er im Klassenzimmer erlebt hat: Schon vor drei Jahren stellte seine Deutschkonferenz fest, dass ein Dr…

👍8❤1

1 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC503 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Leihmutterschaft: Gekaufte Kinder vermissen ihre Mutter 🤨 Leihmutterschaft ist seltener Gegenstand öffentlicher Debatten. Seit dem Spahn-Skandal ist das anders. Das ist positiv, wenn das Schlaglicht endlich auch auf die Leidtragenden - die Frauen und die Kinder - gerichtet wird. 🚼 Aber allzu oft wird am eigentlichen Problem vorbeidiskutiert. Deshalb haben wir einen grundsätzlichen und tiefschürfenden Beitrag veröff…

😢6❤1🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC≈3,090 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Terroranschlag und Spahns Babykauf: Wie zwei Anlässe für alte Forderungen benutzt werden 👎🏻 Diese Masche muß auffliegen: Alte Forderungen liegen in der Schublade, und sobald ein halbwegs passender Anlaß die Öffentlichkeit bewegt, werden sie hervorgeholt. ➡️ So wird der Terroranschlag gegen den CSD in Berlin von der SPD benutzt, um erneut für "sexuelle Identität" ins Grundgesetz zu lobbyieren und der Spahn-Skandal v…

🔥3🤬3

27 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC674 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ungleich vor dem Gesetz 😳 Für den Provokateur Sven Liebich, der sich selbst seit einiger Zeit „Marla Svenja Liebich“ nennt, soll das Selbstbestimmungsgesetz (SBGG) nicht länger gelten. ➡️ Wie BILD berichtet, muss er seine Haftstrafe nun in einem sächsischen Männergefängnis absitzen. Zur gleichen Zeit darf in Thüringen ein verurteilter Sexualstraftäter, der sich plötzlich zur Frau erklärt, das SBGG nutzen, um sich v…

🔥7👍3❤2

26 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC643 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

„Sexuelle Identität“ ins Grundgesetz? Büchse der Pandora! Es ist ein trojanisches Pferd: Unter bunten Vorwänden wollen woke Aktivisten und linke Politiker ihren Kampfbegriff „sexuelle Identität“ im Grundgesetz verankern. Die Folgen wären verheerend und würden auch der zurecht in Deutschland nicht erlaubten Polygamie Tür und Tor öffnen. Erfahren Sie mehr über den Plan und wie wir ihn aufhalten: www.DemoFuerAlle.de/…

👍8🤬2

26 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC543 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

➡️ Der "kleine" Rücktritt vom Amt des Fraktionsvorsitzenden reicht nicht! 📣 Teilt diesen Beitrag. 📲 Folgt uns unter @demofueralle. 📨 Abonniert unseren Newsletter.

👍18

25 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC513 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😵‍💫 Diese Leute brauchen Hilfe, keine Megafone! Man reibt sich ungläubig die Augen: „Menschen aller Geschlechter brauchen Zugang zu Abtreibungen“? So steht es allen Ernstes im Beitragstext der Aktivistengruppe „FreeSafeLegal“, die vor wenigen Tagen auf der Dublin Pride Parade mitmarschierte. Die Implikation: Männer könnten schwanger werden und sollten daher auch abtreiben dürfen. Die Realität unterm Regenbogen über…

👍6😢6🤯2❤1

25 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC495 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🛑 Leihmutterschaft? Nein, danke! 📣 Teilt diesen Beitrag. 📲 Folgt uns unter @demofueralle. 📨 Abonniert unseren Newsletter.

👍23❤3

24 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC477 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Spahns Rücktritt war unvermeidlich. #DemoFürAlle 📣 Teilt diesen Beitrag. 📲 Folgt uns unter @demofueralle. 📨 Abonniert unseren Newsletter.

🤯3👎1

23 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC587 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

++ Ein Baby zu kaufen, macht einen nicht zu Eltern! ++ Jens Spahn und sein Partner Daniel Funke werden derzeit in den Medien als frischgebackene „Eltern“ bezeichnet. Spahn sei „Vater“ geworden. Ein „Familienglück“ wird gefeiert, das eigentlich aus guten Gründen in Deutschland illegal ist. Denn dieses Baby ist in den USA gekauft worden, um die egoistischen Sehnsüchte Erwachsener in einer unfruchtbaren Beziehung zu e…

👍10

23 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC530 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Der kleine Rücktritt genügt nicht: Jens Spahn muss auch sein Mandat abgeben 🔴 Jens Spahn ist als Vorsitzender der Unionsfraktion im Bundestag zurückgetreten. Drei Tage zuvor hatten er und sein Partner die Geburt „ihres“ Kindes verkündet, dass sie über eine Agentur in den USA bei einer Leihmutter bestellt hatten. 💰 Was in Deutschland verboten ist, hat sich der zweitmächtigste Mann der Union im Ausland gekauft. Der R…

👍8

22 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC495 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Untragbar. #DemoFürAlle 📣 Teilt diesen Beitrag. 📲 Folgt uns unter @demofueralle. 📨 Abonniert unseren Newsletter.

🔥8👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @demofueralle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

خطوات تقنية | Meddean.com 📲
@programmerst · 29,100
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DemoFürAlle” (@demofueralle), 2,168 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/demofueralle.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.