Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Будни Лань🪷~

Channel

Будни Лань🪷~

@demon20_nn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

355subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002586889189
TypeChannel
Username@demon20_nn
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/demon20_nn

Growth

3413553487 August 2026 — 341 subscribers7 August 2026 — 341 subscribers14 August 2026 — 343 subscribers20 August 2026 — 342 subscribers27 August 2026 — 348 subscribers2 September 2026 — 355 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 26 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 339–357 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 08:34355+7
27 Aug 2026, 03:47348+6
20 Aug 2026, 23:36342-1
14 Aug 2026, 21:23343+2
7 Aug 2026, 10:43341no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:48341first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

209 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51996065809951940714019.1%
custom 54295958176336768663617.2%
custom 53597930084117069793114.8%
custom 53439591862732419132913.9%
💅2913.9%
custom 53593949594326472232512.0%
💋146.70%
🥰31.44%
🍓10.478%
💘10.478%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC51 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! предпочитаешь отдавать парики вигмейкерам или самостоятельно? что нравится больше —предпочитаю учиться самой укладывать парички, вигмейкерам только в том случае если у самой не получатся 👀

💋5custom 54295958176336768662💘1

6 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC55 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Что, что, чистить тгк от анонки? Нет, не слышала 🤩

💅4custom 53593949594326472232custom 54295958176336768661

6 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC74 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Думаю заказать петличку и снимать разговорники, хотели бы? 💗

custom 51996065809951940714custom 54295958176336768663💋1

6 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC75 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Лань Вы тоже живёте в Самаре Мечтаю вас увидеть у вас красивые косплеи🙏 —приветик, даа, я живу в Самаре, спасибочки 💗

💅6custom 54295958176336768664💋1

6 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC73 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Приветик, можно сегодня или завтра с тобой в рб или в геншин поиграть? —приветик, смотря кто вы 👀

💅7custom 53439591862732419132custom 54295958176336768661

6 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC74 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! привета любимая ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ —приветаааа 💘💘💘 💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Привееет Шаришь за мазелова? Если да то сделаешь косплей на Нюту или Альфреда или ты уже делала?🌟 —приветики, к сожалению не шарю(

custom 51996065809951940717💅2💋1

6 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC73 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! pososi —net 🤨

custom 51996065809951940717💅2custom 53439591862732419132custom 53593949594326472231

6 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC75 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Здравствуйте извините за такой вопрос у вас есть подруга которая косплеет Линетт из геншина —Здравствуйте! Насколько помню нет 🐱

custom 53597930084117069795custom 51996065809951940712custom 54295958176336768661

6 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC75 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Давайте в анонку?

custom 51996065809951940714custom 53593949594326472232💋1

6 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC95 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Потапаем активчика? 😏

custom 53597930084117069796custom 53439591862732419133custom 51996065809951940711custom 54295958176336768661

6 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC162 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤲🌸🌸🌺😌🤲 «А можем отправиться на Луну и посмотреть на Тейват. Я раньше каждый день долго гуляла в Сильвермунд-Холле, так что не переживайте за меня». 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩Ph/rt 🤩🤩🤩 🤩Colombina🤩🤩🤩

custom 535939495943264722317custom 51996065809951940718custom 53439591862732419137💋4custom 54295958176336768661

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @demon20_nn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Будни Лань🪷~” (@demon20_nn), 355 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/demon20_nn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.